[A MULTICENTER CLINICAL SURVEY ABOUT THE PREVALENCE OF JAPANESE CYPRESS POLLINOSIS AND THE EFFICACY OF SUBLINGUAL IMMUNOTHERAPY WITH JAPANESE CEDAR POLLEN EXTRACT DURING JAPANESE CYPRESS POLLEN DISPERSAL PERIOD].

BACKGROUND: Little is known whether sublingual immunotherapy using Japanese cedar pollen extract (cedar SLIT) is effective for not only Japanese cedar pollinosis but also Japanese cypress pollinosis. We investigated the prevalence rate of Japanese cypress pollinosis, efficacy of cedar SLIT on cypress pollinosis and patients' wish to receive cypress SLIT. METHODS: We investigated a multi-center (31 institutions), cross-sectional survey using a self-administrated questionnaire with four questions for patients received cedar SLIT aged from 5 to 69 years old. RESULTS: 2523 subjects were enrolled for analysis. 83.4% of them had pollinosis symptoms during cypress season before cedar SLIT. In such patients, 37.4% experienced lessened efficacy of cedar SLIT during cypress season. Both the prevalence of cypress pollinosis and the lessened efficacy of cedar SLIT on cypress pollinosis were significantly seen in western Japan as compared to eastern Japan. 76.1% of the subject having cypress pollinosis before SLIT wished to receive cypress SLIT if it is available. CONCLUSION: A lessened efficacy of cedar SLIT during cypress season was broadly seen in Japan, and further showed a regional difference. Together with the finding of high wish by patients, these results suggest a development of cypress SLIT is desirable.

Antigen-induced expression of CD203c on basophils predicts IgE-mediated wheat allergy.

BACKGROUND: For in vitro diagnosis of wheat allergy, specific IgE to wheat is known to be a poor predictive marker. Oral food challenge, the gold standard for the diagnosis, is accompanied by a risk of severe induced reactions. Reliable in vitro tests are needed to be developed for safe indication for oral challenge. OBJECTIVE: We examined the utility of a basophil activation marker, CD203c, for the diagnosis of IgE-mediated wheat allergy. METHODS: Fifty-eight children with suspected wheat allergy with positive CAP-FEIA to wheat were enrolled. On 70 occasions, the clinical distinction between patients with wheat allergy (WA) and patients tolerant to wheat (TW) was made by means of an oral food challenge test or recent history of immediate allergic reactions or tolerance after ingestion of wheat. Twelve replicate evaluations were performed in 9 patients over more than a 6-month interval. Thirty two patients on 43 occasions were diagnosed with WA and 27 were confirmed to be TW. One patient had both diagnoses 18 months apart. Peripheral blood was incubated with fractionated wheat extracts, purified native omega-5 gliadin (nOG5) and recombinant omega-5 gliadin (rOG5). Expression of CD203c on basophils was then analyzed by flow cytometry using a commercial kit. RESULTS: All wheat proteins induced concentration-dependent enhancement of CD203c expression in WA, but did not in TW. The analysis of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) showed that nOG5-induced CD203c(high)% values provided the best power for discriminating between WA and TW, with a sensitivity of 85.0% and specificity of 77.0% at the cut-off level of 14.4%. AUC for CD203c with nOG5 were significantly higher than that for conventional CAP-FEIA, 0.89 and 0.73, respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of nOG-induced enhancement of CD203c on basophils is useful for the diagnosis of immediate wheat allergy in children.

Allergen-induced basophil CD203c expression as a biomarker for rush immunotherapy in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis.

BACKGROUND: Rush immunotherapy (RIT) can confer rapid clinical benefit on patients with allergic rhinitis or asthma. However, biomarkers representing mechanisms for the efficacy of RIT are still to be established. CD203c is a basophil activation marker known to be upregulated by cross-linking of the FcepsilonRIalpha receptor and may serve as a useful marker. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the changes in allergen-induced CD203c expression in patients with Japanese cedar pollen (JCP) pollinosis who received RIT. METHODS: Nine patients treated with RIT were enrolled in the study. Whole blood was incubated with various concentrations of JCP extract. CD203c expression on basophils was quantitated by means of flow cytometry. JCP-specific IgG4 levels in sera were measured with ELISA. Basophil histamine release, CAP-RAST to JCP (JCP-IgE) and total IgE were also examined. The biomarkers listed above were evaluated before and sequentially after RIT. Symptom and quality of life scores were obtained during pre- and posttreatment pollen seasons. RESULTS: All patients showed significant improvement in symptom and quality of life scores after RIT. Serum JCP-specific IgG4 titers were significantly elevated at 1 month and remained at high levels 12 months after the treatment. Stimulation with JCP extract induced enhancement of basophil CD203c expression in a concentration-dependent manner except for 2 subjects in whom no increase in CD203c by an anti-IgE antibody was observed (nonresponders). Significant reductions in the responses were observed in 4 subjects after RIT (reduction in CD203c expression, RCE) whereas no changes were seen in 3 subjects (non-RCE). RCE subjects were older than non-RCE counterparts, with mean ages of 20 and 12 years, respectively. No significant changes in JCP-specific IgE and total IgE levels were seen before and after RIT. CONCLUSION: Allergen-induced CD203c expression in basophils may represent, at least in part, the cellular mechanism for the therapeutic responses to RIT for JCP pollinosis. However, further larger-scale studies to confirm the utility of the test are necessary.

Blocking antibody is generated in allergic rhinitis patients during specific immunotherapy using standardized Japanese cedar pollen extract.

BACKGROUND: Japanese cedar pollen is by far the most important cause of allergic rhinitis in Japan. In this study, we assessed the induction of blocking antibody during specific immunotherapy (SIT) using a recently standardized allergen extract from Japanese cedar pollen. METHODS: Basophils from nonallergic subjects were passively sensitized with serum samples prepared from pollinosis patients before and after SIT; all patients showed good clinical efficacy. The cells were then stimulated with the standardized allergen, and histamine release was measured. In most experiments, the basophil stimulation buffer contained 1% serum. RESULTS: Pollinosis patients' sera obtained both before and after SIT showed essentially similar sensitizing capacity for basophils. Basophil degranulation in response to a relatively low concentration of pollen extract was effectively suppressed by addition of post-SIT serum samples, indicating the presence of blocking antibody. The blocking antibody was IgG, and its potency varied widely among the donor patients. CONCLUSIONS: The standardized allergen extract from Japanese cedar pollen is useful not only for clinical application in SIT, but also for testing for induction of blocking antibody during SIT.