Meta-analysis using individual patient data: efficacy and durability of topical alicaforsen for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: The antisense ICAM-1 inhibitor alicaforsen has been studied in four phase 2 studies in ulcerative colitis (UC). Recruited patients varied as to the extent of their colitis and in the severity of disease at entry. AIM: To investigate the efficacy of alicaforsen enema in specific UC populations. Efficacy was analysed for short-term (week 6-10) and long-term (week 30) outcomes compared with either placebo or a high-dose mesalazine (mesalamine) enema in patients with disease extent up to 40 cm from the anal verge in patients with moderate or severe disease, and in patients with both of these features. METHODS: Individual patient data meta-analyses of 200 patients from four phase 2 studies evaluating nightly alicaforsen 240 mg enema and comparators. Patient data were pooled and analysed in a single data set. Continuous outcomes were evaluated using anova; dichotomous outcomes were evaluated using Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Alicaforsen showed superior efficacy vs. placebo in: patients with disease extent up to 40 cm, patients with moderate and severe disease and especially when both those conditions were satisfied. In these patient groups, mesalazine also showed short-term efficacy. At week 30, however, the efficacy of mesalazine waned and alicaforsen became significantly more efficacious. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc meta-analysis showed that alicaforsen is effective in patients with active UC, especially in patients with distal disease, which is of moderate/severe activity. The efficacy of alicaforsen was durable in these sub-groups, suggesting a disease-modifying effect. This analysis suggests that alicaforsen enema may offer an effective, potentially durable response in moderate/severe distal active UC.

Cost effectiveness of deferasirox compared to desferrioxamine in the treatment of iron overload in lower-risk, transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndrome patients.

OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the cost effectiveness of deferasirox (Exjade * ) compared to non-proprietary desferrioxamine (DFO) for the control of transfusional iron overload in lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients. A UK National Health Service perspective was adopted. METHODS: Recent clinical evidence has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of deferasirox in transfusion-dependent MDS patients with elevated serum ferritin levels. An economic model was used to extrapolate the clinical benefits of iron chelation therapy (ICT) in a cohort of lower risk MDS patients. Costs for drug acquisition, drug administration and monitoring, and quality of life (utility) outcomes associated with mode of drug administration were derived from a variety of sources. The incremental cost per QALY gained for deferasirox was estimated. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% in line with UK standards. RESULTS: The base-case cost effectiveness of deferasirox versus DFO was estimated to be £20,822 per QALY gained, the key driver being the additional quality of life benefits associated with a simpler mode of administration for deferasirox. A mean survival benefit for both forms of ICT of 4.5 years was estimated. The results were sensitive to drug dose, days of DFO administration, and patient weight. CONCLUSIONS: In the UK, a cost per QALY below £20,000-30,000 is considered cost effective. Hence, the results from this economic analysis suggest deferasirox is cost effective in lower risk, transfusion-dependent, MDS patients. Limitations with the analysis include a lack of comparative randomised controlled trial evidence, in particular to differentiate survival and clinical outcomes for deferasirox and DFO.

Cost-utility analysis of deferasirox compared to standard therapy with desferrioxamine for patients requiring iron chelation therapy in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-utility of deferasirox (Exjade) compared to standard therapy using desferrioxamine (Desferal) for the control of iron overload in patients receiving frequent blood transfusions. The perspective adopted was that of the National Health Service in the UK. METHODS: Phase II/III clinical trials have shown deferasirox in the recommended doses of 20-30 mg/kg per day to have similar efficacy to desferrioxamine at equivalent doses in the control of chronic iron overload. The main difference between them is in the mode of administration. Desferrioxamine is administered parenterally as a slow subcutaneous infusion typically infused 8-12 hours a day for 5-7 days a week. In comparison, deferasirox provides 24 hour chelation via a once daily oral tablet dispersed in water or juice. An excel based economic model was developed to evaluate the annual healthcare costs and quality of life, or utility, benefits associated with differences in mode of administration, using beta-thalassaemia as the reference case. A community utility study using time trade-off methods was performed to determine utility outcomes associated with iron chelation therapy (ICT) mode of administration. RESULTS: In the reference case (patient mean weight 42 kg), deferasirox 'dominated' desferrioxamine, i.e. resulted in lower net costs and higher quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Drug dose and cost is patient weight related. Incremental cost per QALY gained was pound 7775 for patients with a mean weight of 62 kg. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-utility analysis did not take drug compliance into account. However, Deferasirox is cost-effective compared to standard iron chelation therapy with desferrioxamine, due to the cost and quality of life benefits derived from a simpler and more convenient oral mode of administration.

Cost analysis of autologous blood transfusion, using cell salvage, compared with allogeneic blood transfusion.

Autologous transfusion is an option infrequently used in the UK, partly because the direct costs are greater than for allogeneic transfusion. An analysis of the cost consequences of substituting autologous for allogeneic blood, by using cell salvage, was undertaken from a hospital perspective. Direct costs were estimated for two different cell salvage devices and sensitivity analysis performed on the key variables. Allogeneic transfusion may be associated with increased rates of postoperative infection due immunomodulation and immunosuppression. As a result, one of the short-term benefits of autologous transfusion is a possible reduction in length of hospital stay. This was the most important variable affecting the cost of autologous transfusion. Cost equivalence for autologous and allogeneic blood was reached at reductions in hospital stay of between 0.3 and 2 days across a range of variables. Reductions in length of hospital stay of this magnitude have been reported in several small studies. The results of our cost analysis suggest that autologous transfusion should not be rejected on the grounds of cost and we recommend a large-scale randomized controlled trial of autologous vs. allogeneic transfusion.

Communication aids for the speech impaired. Cost and quality-of-life outcomes of assessment programs provided by specialist Communication Aids Centers in the United Kingdom.

An evaluation was conducted of the approaches, costs, and quality-of-life outcomes associated with communication aid assessment programs for the speech-impaired provided by specialist Communication Aids Centres (CACs) in the United Kingdom. The average costs of CAC assessment programs was 410 pounds per client, which is not excessive. There was evidence of moderate quality-of-life benefits from clients' use of the recommended aids.