The Interplay between Dietary Phosphorous, Protein Intake, and Mortality in a Prospective Hemodialysis Cohort.

(1) Background: Current dietary recommendations for dialysis patients suggest that high phosphorus diets may be associated with adverse outcomes such as hyperphosphatemia and death. However, there has been concern that excess dietary phosphorus restriction may occur at the expense of adequate dietary protein intake in this population. We hypothesized that higher dietary phosphorus intake is associated with higher mortality risk among a diverse cohort of hemodialysis patients. (2) Methods: Among 415 patients from the multi-center prospective Malnutrition, Diet, and Racial Disparities in Kidney Disease Study, we examined the associations of absolute dietary phosphorus intake (mg/day), ascertained by food frequency questionnaires, with all-cause mortality using multivariable Cox models. In the secondary analyses, we also examined the relationship between dietary phosphorus scaled to 1000 kcal of energy intake (mg/kcal) and dietary phosphorus-to-protein ratio (mg/g) with survival. (3) Results: In expanded case-mix + laboratory + nutrition adjusted analyses, the lowest tertile of dietary phosphorus intake was associated with higher mortality risk (ref: highest tertile): adjusted HR (aHR) (95% CI) 3.33 (1.75-6.33). In the analyses of dietary phosphorus scaled to 1000 kcal of energy intake, the lowest tertile of intake was associated with higher mortality risk compared to the highest tertile: aHR (95% CI) 1.74 (1.08, 2.80). Similarly, in analyses examining the association between dietary phosphorus-to-protein ratio, the lowest tertile of intake was associated with higher mortality risk compared to the highest tertile: aHR (95% CI) 1.67 (1.02-2.74). (4) Conclusions: A lower intake of dietary phosphorus was associated with higher mortality risk in a prospective hemodialysis cohort. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between specific sources of dietary phosphorus intake and mortality in this population.

Effect of high-protein meals during hemodialysis combined with lanthanum carbonate in hypoalbuminemic dialysis patients: findings from the FrEDI randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate protein intake and hypoalbuminemia, indicators of protein-energy wasting, are among the strongest mortality predictors in hemodialysis patients. Hemodialysis patients are frequently counseled on dietary phosphorus restriction, which may inadvertently lead to decreased protein intake. We hypothesized that, in hypoalbuminemic hemodialysis patients, provision of high-protein meals during hemodialysis combined with a potent phosphorus binder increases serum albumin without raising phosphorus levels. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 110 adults undergoing thrice-weekly hemodialysis with serum albumin <4.0 g/dL recruited between July 2010 and October 2011 from eight Southern California dialysis units. Patients were randomly assigned to receive high-protein (50-55 g) meals during dialysis, providing 400-500 mg phosphorus, combined with lanthanum carbonate versus low-protein (<1 g) meals during dialysis, providing <20 mg phosphorus. Prescribed nonlanthanum phosphorus binders were continued over an 8-week period. The primary composite outcome was a rise in serum albumin of ≥0.2 g/dL while maintaining phosphorus between 3.5-<5.5 mg/dL. Secondary outcomes included achievement of the primary outcome's individual endpoints and changes in mineral and bone disease and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: Among 106 participants who satisfied the trial entrance criteria, 27% ( n = 15) and 12% ( n = 6) of patients in the high-protein versus low-protein hemodialysis meal groups, respectively, achieved the primary outcome (intention-to-treat P-value = 0.045). A lower proportion of patients in the high-protein versus low-protein intake groups experienced a meaningful rise in interleukin-6 levels: 9% versus 31%, respectively (P = 0.009). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: In hypoalbuminemic hemodialysis patients, high-protein meals during dialysis combined with lanthanum carbonate are safe and increase serum albumin while controlling phosphorus.

Dietary protein intake and chronic kidney disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: High-protein intake may lead to increased intraglomerular pressure and glomerular hyperfiltration. This can cause damage to glomerular structure leading to or aggravating chronic kidney disease (CKD). Hence, a low-protein diet (LPD) of 0.6-0.8 g/kg/day is often recommended for the management of CKD. We reviewed the effect of protein intake on incidence and progression of CKD and the role of LPD in the CKD management. RECENT FINDINGS: Actual dietary protein consumption in CKD patients remains substantially higher than the recommendations for LPD. Notwithstanding the inconclusive results of the 'Modification of Diet in Renal Disease' (MDRD) study, the largest randomized controlled trial to examine protein restriction in CKD, several prior and subsequent studies and meta-analyses appear to support the role of LPD on retarding progression of CKD and delaying initiation of maintenance dialysis therapy. LPD can also be used to control metabolic derangements in CKD. Supplemented LPD with essential amino acids or their ketoanalogs may be used for incremental transition to dialysis especially on nondialysis days. The LPD management in lieu of dialysis therapy can reduce costs, enhance psychological adaptation, and preserve residual renal function upon transition to dialysis. Adherence and adequate protein and energy intake should be ensured to avoid protein-energy wasting. SUMMARY: A balanced and individualized dietary approach based on LPD should be elaborated with periodic dietitian counseling and surveillance to optimize management of CKD, to assure adequate protein and energy intake, and to avoid or correct protein-energy wasting.

North American experience with Low protein diet for Non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease.

Whereas in many parts of the world a low protein diet (LPD, 0.6-0.8 g/kg/day) is routinely prescribed for the management of patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD), this practice is infrequent in North America. The historical underpinnings related to LPD in the USA including the non-conclusive results of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study may have played a role. Overall trends to initiate dialysis earlier in the course of CKD in the US allowed less time for LPD prescription. The usual dietary intake in the US includes high dietary protein content, which is in sharp contradistinction to that of a LPD. The fear of engendering or worsening protein-energy wasting may be an important handicap as suggested by a pilot survey of US nephrologists; nevertheless, there is also potential interest and enthusiasm in gaining further insight regarding LPD's utility in both research and in practice. Racial/ethnic disparities in the US and patients' adherence are additional challenges. Adherence should be monitored by well-trained dietitians by means of both dietary assessment techniques and 24-h urine collections to estimate dietary protein intake using urinary urea nitrogen (UUN). While keto-analogues are not currently available in the USA, there are other oral nutritional supplements for the provision of high-biologic-value proteins along with dietary energy intake of 30-35 Cal/kg/day available. Different treatment strategies related to dietary intake may help circumvent the protein- energy wasting apprehension and offer novel conservative approaches for CKD management in North America.

Dietary restrictions in dialysis patients: is there anything left to eat?

A significant number of dietary restrictions are imposed traditionally and uniformly on maintenance dialysis patients, whereas there is very little data to support their benefits. Recent studies indicate that dietary restrictions of phosphorus may lead to worse survival and poorer nutritional status. Restricting dietary potassium may deprive dialysis patients of heart-healthy diets and lead to intake of more atherogenic diets. There is little data about the survival benefits of dietary sodium restriction, and limiting fluid intake may inherently lead to lower protein and calorie consumption, when in fact dialysis patients often need higher protein intake to prevent and correct protein-energy wasting. Restricting dietary carbohydrates in diabetic dialysis patients may not be beneficial in those with burnt-out diabetes. Dietary fat including omega-3 fatty acids may be important caloric sources and should not be restricted. Data to justify other dietary restrictions related to calcium, vitamins, and trace elements are scarce and often contradictory. The restriction of eating during hemodialysis treatment is likely another incorrect practice that may worsen hemodialysis induced hypoglycemia and nutritional derangements. We suggest careful relaxation of most dietary restrictions and adoption of a more balanced and individualized approach, thereby easing some of these overzealous restrictions that have not been proven to offer major advantages to patients and their outcomes and which may in fact worsen patients' quality of life and satisfaction. This manuscript critically reviews the current paradigms and practices of recommended dietary regimens in dialysis patients including those related to dietary protein, carbohydrate, fat, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, and calcium, and discusses the feasibility and implications of adherence to ardent dietary restrictions and future research.