Available prognostic models for risk stratification of diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients: a systematic review.

The International Prognostic Index (IPI) has been used for risk stratification for a long time in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Based on new clinical and biological prognostic markers, many new prognostic models have been described. This review aims to present the progress in development and validation of these prognostic models. A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify studies that proposed a new prognostic model in DLBCL. A total of 38 studies met the inclusion criteria. The IPI, revised IPI (R-IPI), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-IPI were the most studied prognostic indexes, externally validated and commonly used to compare to other models. Despite an increasing number of prognostic models have been proposed lately, most of them lack external validation. Further studies, that combine biological and clinical markers with prognostic significance, are needed to determine the optimal prognostic tool for more personalized treatment approach to DLBCL patients.

Contrasting Effects of Pressure Compensation on TEOAE and DPOAE in Children With Negative Middle Ear Pressure.

In children with normal cochlear acuity, middle ear fluid often abolishes otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), and negative middle ear pressure (NMEP) reduces them. No convincing evidence of beneficial pressure compensation on distortion product OAE (DPOAE) has yet been presented. Two studies aimed to document effects of NMEP on transient OAE (TEOAE) and DPOAE. In Study 1, TEOAE and DPOAE pass/fail responses were analyzed before and after pressure compensation in 50 consecutive qualifying referrals having NMEP from -100 to -299 daPa. Study 2 concentrated on DPOAE, recording both amplitude (distortion product amplitude) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) before and after pressure compensation. Of the 20 participants, 5 had both ears qualifying. An effect of compensation on meeting a pass criterion was present in TEOAE for both left and right ear data in Study 1 but not demonstrable in DPOAE. In Study 2, the distortion product amplitude compensation effect was marginal overall, and depended on recording frequency band. SNR values improved moderately after pressure compensation in the two (overlapping) sets of single-ear data. In the five cases with both ears qualifying, a stronger compensation effect size, over 3 dB, was seen. The absolute dependence of SNR on frequency was also strongly replicated, but in no analysis, the frequency × compensation interaction was significant. Independent of particular frequency range, the data support a limited SNR improvement in 2 to 3 dB for compensation in DPOAE, with slightly larger effects in ears giving SNRs between 0 dB and +6 dB, where pass/fail cutoffs would generally be located.

Validation of the Neck Disability Index in Serbian Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to translate the Neck Disability Index into the Serbian language (NDI-S) and to investigate the validity of this version for use in Serbian population. METHODS: Fifty patients with cervical radiculopathy were enrolled in the study and completed a multidimensional questionnaire, including NDI-S. Inclusion criteria were ages between 18 and 65 years, Serbian speaking, no cognitive or hearing impairment, sharp and radiating neck and upper extremity pain that has lasted less than 12 months, radiculopathy signs evaluated by electromyoneurography and disc herniation, or spondylotic changes of cervical spine visualized on magnetic resonance imaging. Exclusion criteria were malignancy, previous cervical spine discectomy, trauma of the cervical spine and myelopathy, polyneuropathy, fibromyalgia, and psychiatric disorders. Validity was determined by the correlation of the Neck Disability Index, with pain measured by visual analogue scale, characteristics related to pain, and mental status. Also, factor structure of NDI-S was explored through factor analysis. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency (Cronbach's α and item-total correlations). RESULTS: Correlation analysis between pain and NDI-S showed significant values (P < .01). The NDI-S correlated well with patients mental status (r = 0.421, P < .01). Cronbach's α of NDI-S was 0.85, denoting excellent internal consistency of the questionnaire. Item-total correlations were significant and ranged from 0.328 to 0.789. Factor analysis demonstrated a 2-factor structure with an explained variance of 55%. CONCLUSION: The NDI-S is a valid questionnaire to measure neck and arm pain related to disability in Serbian patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Is it possible to improve prognostic value of NCCN-IPI in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma? The prognostic significance of comorbidities.

The prognostic value of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) has been re-evaluated in the rituximab-treated diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Accordingly, National Comprehensive Cancer Network-IPI (NCCN-IPI) has been introduced to estimate prognosis of DLBCL patients. However, comorbidities that frequently affect elderly DLBCL patients were not analyzed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of comorbidities using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in 962 DLBCL patients. According to CCI, majority of patients (73.6%) did not have any comorbidity, while high CCI (≥ 2) was observed in 71/962 (7.4%) patients, and in 55/426 (12.9%) of the elderly patients aged ≥ 60 years. When the CCI was analyzed in a multivariate model along with the NCCN-IPI parameters, it stood out as a threefold independent risk factor of a lethal outcome. Also, we have developed a novel comorbidity-NCCN-IPI (cNCCN-IPI) by adding additional 3 points if the patient had a CCI ≥ 2. Four risk groups emerged with the following patient distribution in low, low-intermediate, high-intermediate, and high group: 3.4, 34.3, 49.4, and 12.5%, respectively. The prognostic value of the new cNCCN-IPI was 2.1% improved compared to that of the IPI, and 1.3% improved compared to that of the NCCN-IPI (p < 0.05). This difference was more pronounced in elderly patients, in whom the cNCCN-IPI showed a 5.1% better discriminative power compared to that of the IPI, and 3.6% better compared to the NCCN-IPI. The NCCN-IPI enhanced by the CCI and combined with redistributed risk groups is better for differentiating risk categories in unselected DLBCL patients, especially in the elderly.

Differences in the level of knowledge on cervical cancer among health care students, midwives and patients in Serbia.

BACKGROUND: Level of midwife knowledge is particularly important because of their role in the cervical cancer prevention programme. The aim of this study was to examine differences in the level of knowledge among health care students, midwives and women in the general population of Serbia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional approach was used with health care students of the medical shool, midwives in their practice, and women visiting a chosen general practitioner as respondents. RESULTS: In comparison with the students and midwives, women had lower level of knowledge of causative agents of the cervical cancer, genital warts, HPV types, screening for cervical cancer as well as about the target population for vaccine and its role. Differences in the numbers of right answers of respondents were statistically significant (p<0.001). Four or more correct answers were obtained from 22.7% women, 35.3% from midwives and 83.8% from students. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives should improve their own level of knowledge related to preventive practice for cervical cancer, as well as their personal compliance with recommended practices, in order to be qualified and credible promoters of cervical cancer control among women in Serbia.

Alumina-on-alumina ceramic versus metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability and durability of alumina-on-alumina ceramic in comparison to metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (CoCr/HXLPE) bearing couples. This prospective randomised study involved 150 patients (157 hips). All patients (mean age: 54.7 years) obtained an identical fibre metal midcoat femoral stem and fibre metal-coated acetabular shell. In 78 patients (82 hips) we used alumina, while in 72 patients (75 hips) metal-polyethylene bearing couples were used. During a mean 50.4-month follow-up period (51 ± 8 alumina and 50 ± 8.9 metal-polyethylene) no statistically significant changes in clinical and radiographic parameters were noted between the two groups. There was no ceramic breakage and no need for revision surgery due to the ceramic liner. The alumina bearing couples proved to be as reliable as CoCr/HXLPE.