Targeting the Hidden Substrate Unmasked by Right Ventricular Extrastimulation Improves Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Outcome After Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether ablation of hidden substrate unmasked by right ventricular extrastimulation (RVE) improves ablation outcome of post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular tachycardia (VT). BACKGROUND: In patients with small or nontransmural scars after MI, part of the VT substrate may be functional and, in addition, masked by high-voltage far-field signals arising from adjacent normal myocardium. METHODS: In 60 consecutive patients, systematic analysis of electrograms recorded from the presumed infarct area was performed during sinus rhythm, RV pacing at 500 ms, and during a short-coupled RV extrastimulus. Sites showing low-voltage, near-field potentials with evoked conduction delay in response to RVE were targeted. RESULTS: In 37 (62%) patients, ablation target sites located in areas with normal voltage during sinus rhythm were unmasked by RVE (hidden substrate group). These patients had better left ventricular function (36 ± 11% vs. 26 ± 12%; p = 0.003), smaller electroanatomical scars (<1.5 mV), and smaller dense scars (<0.5 mV) (median 59 and 14 cm2 vs. 82 and 44 cm2; p = 0.044 and p = 0.003) than did those in whom no hidden substrate was identified (overt substrate group). During a median follow-up of 16 months, 13 (22%) patients had VT recurrence. Patients with hidden substrate had a lower incidence of VT recurrence (12-month VT-free survival 89% vs. 50% in patients with overt substrate; p = 0.005). Compared with a historical cohort of 90 post-MI patients matched for left ventricular function and electroanatomical scar area, in whom no RVE was performed, patients in the hidden substrate group had a higher 1-year VT-free survival (89% vs. 73%; p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Hidden substrate ablation unmasked by RVE improves ablation outcome in post-MI patients with small or nontransmural scars.

Endocardial or epicardial ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy? The role of 12-lead ECG criteria in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Specific 12-lead ECG criteria have been reported to predict an epicardial site of origin (SoO) of induced ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in left ventricular nonischemic cardiomyopathy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the value of ECG criteria to predict an epicardial SoO of clinically documented VTs, (2) analyze the effect of VT cycle length (CL) and antiarrhythmic drugs on the accuracy of ECG criteria, and (3) assess interobserver variability. METHODS: In 36 consecutive patients with nonischemic left ventricular cardiomyopathy (age 58 ± 16 years, 75% male) who underwent combined endocardial/epicardial VT ablation, all clinically documented and induced right bundle branch block VTs were analyzed for previously reported ECG criteria to determine the SoO, as defined by ≥11/12 pace-map, concealed entrainment, and/or VT termination during ablation. RESULTS: In 21 patients with clinically documented (25 mm/s) right bundle branch block VT, none of the ECG criteria differentiated between patients with and those without an epicardial SoO. In induced VTs (100 mm/s), 2 of 4 interval criteria differentiated between an endocardial and epicardial SoO for slow VTs (CL >350 ms) and 2 of 4 criteria in patients on amiodarone, but none for fast VTs (CL ≤350 ms) or patients off amiodarone. The Q wave in lead I was the most accurate criterion for an epicardial SoO (sensitivity 88%, specificity 80%). In both clinically documented and induced VTs, interobserver agreement was poor for pseudodelta wave and moderate for other criteria. CONCLUSION: When applied to clinically documented VTs, no ECG criterion could differentiate between patients with and those without an epicardial SoO. Published interval-based ECG criteria do not apply to fast VTs and patients off amiodarone.