Comparison of treatment effect across varying severities of meibomian gland dropout.

PURPOSE: Better understanding of the pathophysiology of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) has provided the opportunity to develop treatments which could be tailored for specific presentations of MGD. This study sought to directly compare treatment effectiveness for three current therapies across differing levels of MG dropout. METHODS: Subjects (n=81), grouped by infrared meibography dropout proportions, into either no (control), mild, or pronounced MG dropout, were randomised to receive treatment with a latent heat device (n=25), liposomal spray (n=28), or heated warm compress (n=28). A battery of tear film measures was performed, pre- and post-application of treatment, and compared by treatment type and MG severity. RESULTS: Symptoms correlated with MG dropout proportions (r=0.618, p<0.001). Following treatment, non-invasive tear breakup time improved (p=0.010), independent of treatment type (p=0.131). The improvement was significant only in the pronounced MGD group (+4.32 ±1.15s, p=0.008), however, following treatment, the mild group was no longer distinct from the control group (p=0.843). Lipid layer grade (LLG) also improved following treatment (p<0.009), but again was not specific to treatment type (p=0.349). All three severity groups showed an improvement in LLG, with 49.3% of participants showing an improvement of at least one grade, and none showing decreased LLG. CONCLUSIONS: Increased LLG across all three treatment groups suggests that all methods increase meibum outflow to the tear film, resulting in a thicker lipid layer after treatment. These results suggest that all three treatments are effective in improving tear film quality, independent of MGD severity based either on symptoms or based on gland dropout.

Prospective trial of intense pulsed light for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) applied to the periocular area for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in a prospective, double-masked, placebo-controlled, paired-eye study. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants underwent IPL treatment, with homogeneously sequenced light pulses delivered to one eye and placebo treatment to the partner control eye at 1, 15, and 45 days following baseline (BL) evaluation. Lipid layer grade (LLG), noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear evaporation rate (TER), tear meniscus height (TMH), and subjective symptom score using visual analogue scales (VAS) were compared with BL and control values at each visit. RESULTS: Lipid layer grade improved significantly from BL to Day (D) 45 in the treated eye (P < 0.001), but not the control eye (P = 0.714), with 82% of treated eyes improving by at least one LLG. Noninvasive tear break-up time also improved significantly from BL to D45 in the treated (P < 0.001) but not in the control eye (P = 0.056) and was significantly longer than in the treated eye at D45 (14.1 ± 9.8 seconds versus 8.6 ± 8.2 seconds, P < 0.001). The tear evaporation rate was not different in the treated eye compared with the control eye at any visit. Tear meniscus height did not change from BL in either eye (P > 0.05). Visual analog scale symptom scores improved from BL in the treated (P = 0.015), but not the control eye (P = 0.245), with 86% of participants noting reduced symptoms in the treated eye by D45. CONCLUSIONS: Intense pulsed light with multiple sculpted pulses shows therapeutic potential for MGD, improving tear film quality and reducing symptoms of dry eye. ( https://www.anzctr.org.au number, ACTRN12614000162617.).