Selumetinib Plus Adjuvant Radioactive Iodine in Patients With High-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial (ASTRA).

PURPOSE: Selumetinib can increase radioactive iodine (RAI) avidity in RAI-refractory tumors. We investigated whether selumetinib plus adjuvant RAI improves complete remission (CR) rates in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) at high risk of primary treatment failure versus RAI alone. METHODS: ASTRA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01843062) is an international, phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Patients with DTC at high risk of primary treatment failure (primary tumor > 4 cm; gross extrathyroidal extension outside the thyroid gland [T4 disease]; or N1a/N1b disease with ≥ 1 metastatic lymph node(s) ≥ 1 cm or ≥ 5 lymph nodes [any size]) were randomly assigned 2:1 to selumetinib 75 mg orally twice daily or placebo for approximately 5 weeks (no stratification). On treatment days 29-31, recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (0.9 mg)-stimulated RAI (131I; 100 mCi/3.7 GBq) was administered, followed by 5 days of selumetinib/placebo. The primary end point (CR rate 18 months after RAI) was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Four hundred patients were enrolled (August 27, 2013-March 23, 2016) and 233 randomly assigned (selumetinib, n = 155 [67%]; placebo, n = 78 [33%]). No statistically significant difference in CR rate 18 months after RAI was observed (selumetinib n = 62 [40%]; placebo n = 30 [38%]; odds ratio 1.07 [95% CI, 0.61 to 1.87]; P = .8205). Treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 25/154 patients (16%) with selumetinib and none with placebo. The most common adverse event with selumetinib was dermatitis acneiform (n = 11 [7%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Postoperative pathologic risk stratification identified patients with DTC at high risk of primary treatment failure, although the addition of selumetinib to adjuvant RAI failed to improve the CR rate for these patients. Future strategies should focus on tumor genotype-tailored drug selection and maintaining drug dosing to optimize RAI efficacy.

Risk Stratification in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: From Detection to Final Follow-Up.

CONTEXT: Modern management of differentiated thyroid cancer requires individualized care plans that tailor the intensity of therapy and follow-up to the estimated risks of recurrence and disease-specific mortality. DESIGN: This summary is based on the authors' knowledge and extensive clinical experience, supplemented by review of published review articles, thyroid cancer management guidelines, published staging systems, and original articles identified through a PubMed search, which included terms such as risk stratification, staging, clinical outcomes, and differentiated thyroid cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In the past, risk stratification in differentiated thyroid cancer usually referred to a static estimate of disease-specific mortality that was based on a small set of clinicopathological features available within a few weeks of completing initial therapy (thyroidectomy, with or without radioactive iodine). Today, risk stratification is a dynamic, active process used to predict the appropriateness for minimalistic initial therapy, disease-specific mortality, risk of recurrence, and the most likely response to initial therapy. Rather than being a static prediction available only after initial therapy, modern risk stratification is a dynamic, iterative process that begins as soon as a suspicious nodule is detected and continues through final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic risk assessment should be used to guide all aspects of thyroid cancer management, beginning before a definitive diagnosis is made and continuing through the final follow-up visit.

Controversies, Consensus, and Collaboration in the Use of 131I Therapy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Joint Statement from the American Thyroid Association, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the European Thyroid Association.

BACKGROUND: Publication of the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer was met with disagreement by the extended nuclear medicine community with regard to some of the recommendations related to the diagnostic and therapeutic use of radioiodine (131I). Because of these concerns, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging declined to endorse the ATA guidelines. As a result of these differences in opinion, patients and clinicians risk receiving conflicting advice with regard to several key thyroid cancer management issues. SUMMARY: To address some of the differences in opinion and controversies associated with the therapeutic uses of 131I in differentiated thyroid cancer constructively, the ATA, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the European Thyroid Association each sent senior leadership and subject-matter experts to a two-day interactive meeting. The goals of this first meeting were to (i) formalize the dialogue and activities between the four societies; (ii) discuss indications for 131I adjuvant treatment; (iii) define the optimal prescribed activity of 131I for adjuvant treatment; and (iv) clarify the definition and classification of 131I-refractory thyroid cancer. CONCLUSION: By fostering an open, productive, and evidence-based discussion, the Martinique meeting restored trust, confidence, and a sense of collegiality between individuals and organizations that are committed to optimal thyroid disease management. The result of this first meeting is a set of nine principles (The Martinique Principles) that (i) describe a commitment to proactive, purposeful, and inclusive interdisciplinary cooperation; (ii) define the goals of 131I therapy as remnant ablation, adjuvant treatment, or treatment of known disease; (iii) describe the importance of evaluating postoperative disease status and multiple other factors beyond clinicopathologic staging in 131I therapy decision making; (iv) recognize that the optimal administered activity of 131I adjuvant treatment cannot be definitely determined from the published literature; and (v) acknowledge that current definitions of 131I-refractory disease are suboptimal and do not represent definitive criteria to mandate whether 131I therapy should be recommended.

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy in Nonanaplastic Thyroid Cancer with Unresectable or Gross Residual Disease.

BACKGROUND: Differentiated thyroid cancer typically has an indolent clinical course but can cause significant morbidity by local progression. Oncologic surgical resection can be technically difficult due to the proximity to critical normal structures in the neck. Our objective was to review the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of definitive-intent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to analyze whether patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy (CC-IMRT) had higher rates of disease control and survival over IMRT alone in patients with unresectable or gross residual disease (GRD). METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with GRD or unresectable nonanaplastic, nonmedullary thyroid cancer treated with definitive-intent IMRT between 2000 and 2015 were identified. Local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses using cox regression were used to determine the impact of clinical conditions and treatment on LPFS, DMFS, and OS. RESULTS: Of the 88 patients identified, 45 (51.1%) were treated CC-IMRT and 43 (48.9%) were treated with IMRT alone. All patients treated with CC-IMRT received weekly doxorubicin (10 mg/m2). The median follow-up among surviving patients was 40.3 months and 29.2 months for all patients. The LPFS at 4 years was 77.3%. Patients receiving CC-IMRT had higher LPFS compared with IMRT alone (CC-IMRT 85.8% vs. IMRT 68.8%, p = 0.036). The 4-year OS was 56.3% for all patients. Patients treated with CC-IMRT had higher OS compared to patients treated with IMRT alone (CC-IMRT 68.0% vs. IMRT 47.0%, p = 0.043). On multivariate analysis, receipt of concurrent chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of death (HR 0.395, p = 0.019) and lower risk of local failure (HR 0.306, p = 0.042). Grade 3+ acute toxicities occurred in 23.9% of patients, the most frequent being dermatitis (18.2%) and mucositis (9.1%). 17.1% of patients required a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube during or shortly after completion of RT, with 10.1% of patients needing a PEG more than 12 months after therapy. The rates of acute and late toxicities were not statistically higher in the CC-IMRT cohort, although trends towards higher toxicity in the CC-IMRT were present for dermatitis and PEG requirement. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT is a safe and effective means to achieve local control in patients with unresectable or incompletely resected nonanaplastic, nonmedullary thyroid cancer. Concurrent doxorubicin was not associated with worse toxicity and should be considered in these patients given its potential to improve local control and overall survival.

Controversial Issues in Thyroid Cancer Management.

The lack of prospective randomized clinical trials for most management topics in differentiated thyroid cancer forces us to make management recommendations based on retrospective observational data, which are often incomplete, subject to selection bias, and conflicting. Therefore, it is not surprising that many aspects of thyroid cancer management remain controversial and not well defined. This review will examine the controversies surrounding 3 important topics in thyroid cancer management: the option of thyroid lobectomy as initial therapy, the use of preoperative neck imaging to optimize the completeness of the initial surgery, and the selective use of radioactive iodine for remnant ablation, adjuvant treatment, or treatment for known persistent or recurrent disease. As thyroid cancer management moves toward a much more risk-adapted approach to personalized recommendations, clinicians and patients must balance the risks and benefits of the potential options to arrive at a plan that is optimized regarding both patient preferences/values and the philosophy/experience of the local disease management team.

Novel concepts for initiating multitargeted kinase inhibitors in radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.

Multitargeted kinase inhibitors have been shown to improve progression-free survival in patients with structurally progressive, radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. While the inclusion criteria for phase 3 clinical trials and clinical practice guidelines provide guidance with regard to the minimal requirements that need to be met prior to initiation of a multitargeted kinase inhibitor, a better way to integrate the rate of structural disease progression with the size of the metastatic foci to more precisely define the optimal time to recommend initiation of therapy for individual patients is needed. In this manuscript we describe how to use assessments of tumor size and growth rates (structural disease doubling times) to define the critical point in time when the volume and rate of progression of metastatic structural disease merits consideration for initiation of systemic therapy (the inflection point).

Defining a Valid Age Cutoff in Staging of Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Age 45 years is used as a cutoff in the staging of well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) as it represents the median age of most datasets. The aim of this study was to determine a statistically optimized age threshold using a large dataset of patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: Overall, 1807 patients with a median follow-up of 109 months were included in the study. Recursive partitioning was used to determine which American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) variables were most predictive of disease-specific death, and whether a different cutoff for age would be found. From the resulting tree, a new age cutoff was picked and patients were restaged using this new cutoff. RESULTS: The 10-year disease-specific survival (DSS) by Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) stage was 99.6, 100, 96, and 81 % for stages I-IV, respectively. Using recursive partitioning, the presence of distant metastasis was the most powerful predictor of DSS. For M0 patients, age was the next most powerful predictor, with a cutoff of 56 years. For M1 patients, a cutoff at 54 years was most predictive. Having reviewed the analysis, age 55 years was selected as a more robust age cutoff than 45 years. The 10-year DSS by new stage (using age 55 years as the cutoff) was 99.2, 98, 100, and 74 % for stages I-IV, respectively. CONCLUSION: A change in age cutoff in the AJCC/UICC staging for WDTC to 55 years would improve the accuracy of the system and appropriately prevent low-risk patients being overstaged and overtreated.

External-beam radiotherapy for differentiated thyroid cancer locoregional control: A statement of the American Head and Neck Society.

The use of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is debated because of a lack of prospective clinical data, but recent retrospective studies have reported benefits in selected patients. The Endocrine Surgery Committee of the American Head and Neck Society provides 4 recommendations regarding EBRT for locoregional control in DTC, based on review of literature and expert opinion of the authors. (1) EBRT is recommended for patients with gross residual or unresectable locoregional disease, except for patients <45 years old with limited gross disease that is radioactive iodine (RAI)-avid. (2) EBRT should not be routinely used as adjuvant therapy after complete resection of gross disease. (3) After complete resection, EBRT may be considered in select patients >45 years old with high likelihood of microscopic residual disease and low likelihood of responding to RAI. (4) Cervical lymph node involvement alone should not be an indication for adjuvant EBRT.

Microscopic Positive Margins in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Is Not an Independent Predictor of Local Failure.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to other head and neck cancers, the impact of histological thyroid specimen margin status in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of margin status on local recurrence in DTC. METHOD: The records of 3664 consecutive patients treated surgically for DTC between 1986 and 2010 were identified from an institutional database. Patients with less than total thyroidectomy, unresectable or gross residual disease, or M1 disease at presentation and those with unknown pathological margin status were excluded from analysis. In total, 2616 patients were included in the study; 2348 patients (90%) had negative margins and 268 patients (10%) had positive margins. Microscopic positive margin status was defined as tumor present at the specimen's edge on pathological analysis. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared by Pearson's chi-squared test. Local recurrence free survival (LRFS) was calculated for each group using the Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 48 years (range 7-91 years) and the median follow-up was 50 months (range 1-330 months). Age, sex, and histology types were similar between groups. As expected, patients who had positive margins were more likely to have larger tumors (p<0.001), extrathyroidal extension (ETE) (p<0.001), multicentric disease (p<0.001), or nodal disease (p<0.001) and were more likely to receive adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy (p<0.001) as well as external beam radiotherapy (p<0.001). The LRFS at 5 years for patients with positive margins status was slightly poorer compared with patients with negative margins (98.9% vs. 99.5%, p=0.018). Twelve patients developed local recurrence-8/2348 (0.34%) patients with negative margins and 4/263 (1.52%) patients with positive margins. Univariate predictors of LRFS were sex (p=0.006), gross ETE (<0.001), and positive margins (p=0.018). However, when controlling for presence of gross ETE on multivariate analysis, microscopic positive margin status was not an independent predictor of LRFS (p=0.193). CONCLUSION: Patients with resectable, M0 disease that undergo total thyroidectomy have an excellent five year LRFS of 99.4%. Microscopic positive margin status was not a significant predictor for local failure after adjusting for ETE or pathological tumor (pT) stage.

Frequent screening with serial neck ultrasound is more likely to identify false-positive abnormalities than clinically significant disease in the surveillance of intermediate risk papillary thyroid cancer patients without suspicious findings on follow-up ultrasound evaluation.

CONTEXT: American Thyroid Association (ATA) intermediate-risk thyroid cancer patients who achieve an excellent treatment response demonstrate a low risk of structural disease recurrence. Despite this fact, most patients undergo frequent surveillance neck ultrasound (US) during follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical utility of routine screening neck US in ATA intermediate-risk patients documented to have a nonstimulated thyroglobulin less than 1.0 ng/mL and a neck US without suspicious findings after therapy. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: Retrospective review of 90 ATA intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma patients treated with total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine ablation in a tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comparison between the frequency of finding false-positive US abnormalities and the frequency of identifying structural disease recurrence in the study cohort was measured. RESULTS: Over a median of 10 years, 90 patients had a median of six US (range 2-16). Structural disease recurrence was identified in 10% (9 of 90) at a median of 6.3 years. Recurrence was associated with other clinical indicators of disease in 5 of the 90 patients (5.6%, 5 of 90) and was detected without other signs of recurrence in four patients (4.8%, 4 of 84). False-positive US abnormalities were identified in 57% (51 of 90), leading to additional testing, which failed to identify clinically significant disease. CONCLUSIONS: In ATA intermediate-risk patients who have a nonstimulated thyroglobulin less than 1.0 ng/mL and a neck US without suspicious findings after therapy, frequent US screening during follow-up is more likely to identify false-positive abnormalities than clinically significant structural disease recurrence.

Thyroid carcinoma, version 2.2014.

These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on some of the major updates to the 2014 NCCN Guidelines for Thyroid Carcinoma. Kinase inhibitor therapy may be used to treat thyroid carcinoma that is symptomatic and/or progressive and not amenable to treatment with radioactive iodine. Sorafenib may be considered for select patients with metastatic differentiated thyroid carcinoma, whereas vandetanib or cabozantinib may be recommended for select patients with metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Other kinase inhibitors may be considered for select patients with either type of thyroid carcinoma. A new section on "Principles of Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Advanced Thyroid Cancer" was added to the NCCN Guidelines to assist with using these novel targeted agents.

Higher administered activities of radioactive iodine are associated with less structural persistent response in older, but not younger, papillary thyroid cancer patients with lateral neck lymph node metastases.

BACKGROUND: While radioactive iodine (RAI) adjuvant therapy is commonly recommended for most papillary thyroid cancer patients presenting with large volume nodal involvement, it remains unclear if such therapy impacts the disease-specific recurrence rate and overall survival. In this study, we compared the risk of achieving a structural persistent response after low administered activity (100 mCi), intermediate administered activity (150 mCi), and high administered activity (>200 mCi) RAI adjuvant therapy in patients presenting with pathologic N1b disease. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 181 papillary thyroid cancer patients with N1b disease treated with total thyroidectomy, neck dissection, and RAI remnant ablation. Dose-response relationships were determined between the administered activity of (131)I and the best response to initial therapy. RESULTS: Out of the 181 patients, only 39% achieved no clinical evidence of disease (NED) after initial therapy. Young patients (Stage I) had a statistically nonsignificant trend toward higher rates of NED with increasing dose (34% low activity, 36% intermediate activity, 46% high activity), but there was no evidence of dose-response effect with regard to the likelihood of having a structural persistent response to initial therapy or the likelihood of having persistent biochemical evidence of disease. However, analysis of the older patients (Stage IVa) did reveal a trend toward statistically significant dose-response relationships with increasing administered activities being associated with lower rates of structural persistent response (46% low activity, 23% intermediate activity, 17% high dose). Unfortunately, the lower rate of structural persistent response only modestly increased the likelihood that patients would be NED but was instead associated with a higher proportion of patients being classified as having biochemical persistent disease at 12-18 months. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that administering more than 100 mCi of RAI as adjuvant therapy in N1b disease is unlikely to improve the initial response to therapy. This is especially true for the younger (Stage I) patients. It is plausible that administered activities of 150-260 mCi may be associated with an improved response to initial therapy in older patients (Stage IVa) who are probably at highest risk of having poor outcomes, but the potential benefit from RAI should be balanced against potential adverse effects in those patients.

The results of selective use of radioactive iodine on survival and on recurrence in the management of papillary thyroid cancer, based on Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk group stratification.

BACKGROUND: The American Thyroid Association guidelines recommend the routine use of radioactive iodine for remnant ablation (RRA) in all T3 or greater primary tumors, and selective use in patients with intrathyroidal disease >1 cm, or evidence of nodal metastases. The guidelines recognize that there is conflicting and inadequate data to make firm recommendations for most patients. The aim of this study was to analyze our institutional experience of the use of RRA in the management of papillary thyroid cancer, with a particular focus on outcomes for those patients selected not to receive RRA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1129 consecutive patients who underwent total thyroidectomy at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1986 and 2005. Of these, 490 were pT1-2 N0, 193 pT1-2 N1, and 444 pT3-4. Details on recurrence and disease-specific survival were recorded by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The five-year disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival in the pT1/T2 N0, pT1-2 N1, and pT3-4 were 100% and 92%, 100% and 92%, and 98% and 87% respectively. Low-risk patients who were managed without RRA (who tended to have limited primary disease, pT1-2, and low-volume metastatic disease in the neck, pT1-2 N1-fewer than five nodes, all <1 cm greatest dimension) had five-year recurrence-free survival of >97%. In the group with advanced local tumors (pT3-4), those patients who did not receive RRA (who tended to have pT3 N0 disease) had five-year recurrence-free survival of >90%. CONCLUSION: Following appropriate surgical management, the majority of patients with low-risk local disease and even some patients with more advanced-stage (pT3) tumors or regional metastases have low rates of recurrence and high rates of survival when managed without RRA.

Selective use of RAI for ablation and adjuvant therapy after total thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer: a practical approach to clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVES: For the past 40 years, many clinicians have recommended RAI remnant ablation for essentially all differentiated thyroid cancer patients with a primary tumor size greater than 1.5 cm or with any evidence of even microscopic disease outside the thyroid capsule. This "one size fits all" approach exposes many low risk thyroid cancer patients to the risks of ionizing radiation with little potential benefit. Current thyroid cancer management guidelines call for a far more risk adapted approach to the selection of patients for post-operative RAI treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We will review the current selective use of RAI ablation recommendations and provide a practical approach to implementation of a risk adapted approach to post-operative RAI administration. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We will show how thoughtful integration of pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative clinico-pathologic factors allows the clinician to accurately identify patients most likely to benefit from RAI administration. This approach ensures that patients most likely to experience a clinical benefit are selected for RAI ablation while avoiding unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation in the majority of low to intermediate risk thyroid cancer patients.

Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma presenting with gross extrathyroidal extension: 1986-2009 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience.

PURPOSE: To describe the outcome of patients with poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC) presenting with gross extrathyroidal extension (ETE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, we performed a retrospective review of a consecutive series of thyroid cancer patients treated by primary surgical resection with or without adjuvant therapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1986 to 2009. Out of 91 PDTC patients, 27 (30%) had gross ETE (T4a), and they formed the basis of our study. Of 27 patients, 52% were women. The median age was 70 years (range 27-87 years). Ten patients (37%) presented with distant metastases; four to bone, three to lung, and three to both bone and lung. All patients had extended total thyroidectomy, except two who had subtotal thyroidectomy. Twenty patients (74%) had central compartment neck dissection and 11 also had lateral neck dissection. Four patients had pN0, six (30%) pN1a, and 10 (50%) pN1b neck disease. Twenty-one patients (77%) had adjuvant therapy: 15 (55%) radioactive iodine (RAI) only, three (11%) postoperative external beam radiation (EBRT) only, and three (11%) had both RAI and EBRT. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) were calculated by the Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 57 months (range 1-197 months). The 5 year OS and DSS were 47% and 49%, respectively. This poor outcome was due to distant metastatic disease; 10 patients had distant metastases at presentation and a further six developed distant metastases during follow-up. Locoregional control was good with 5-year LRFS and RRFS of 70% and 62%, respectively. Overall, eight patients (30%) had recurrences: two had distant alone, two regional, two regional and distant, one local and distant, and one had local, regional, and distant recurrence. CONCLUSION: Aggressive surgery in patients with PDTC showing gross ETE resulted in satisfactory locoregional control. Due to the small proportion of patients who received EBRT (22%), it is not possible to analyze its benefit on locoregional control. Of significance is the observation that the majority of patients (60%) who presented with or subsequently developed distant metastases eventually died of distant disease. New systemic therapies to target distant metastatic disease are required for improvements in outcome.

Recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone to stimulate 131-I uptake for remnant ablation and adjuvant therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature with regard to the use of recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone (rhTSH) as an adjunct to radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation and adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Literature review of clinical studies examining rhTSH and/or thyroid hormone withdrawal preparations for RAI remnant ablation. The primary endpoints evaluated were (1) effectiveness at ablating the thyroid bed as demonstrated by the lack of significant uptake in the thyroid bed on follow-up diagnostic imaging and (2) effectiveness in facilitating the adjuvant therapy function of RAI ablation as manifested by follow-up thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)-stimulated serum thyroglobulin levels and clinical outcomes (recurrence rates, likelihood of having no evidence of disease at final follow-up). RESULTS: RAI remnant ablation can be successfully achieved using either traditional thyroid hormone withdrawal or recombinant human TSH preparation. While initial studies included primarily thyroid cancer patients at low risk of recurrence, more recent studies suggest that rhTSH can also be effectively used as preparation for RAI ablation in patients with an intermediate or high risk of recurrence. Furthermore, while early studies focused primarily on the endpoint of thyroid bed remnant ablation, more recent retrospective studies suggest that final clinical outcomes (recurrence rates, likelihood of achieving no evidence of disease status at final follow-up) over 5-10 years of follow-up are very similar with either method of preparation. CONCLUSION: rhTSH is an effective alternative to thyroid hormone withdrawal in preparation for RAI remnant ablation in patients without evidence of distant metastases who are at low, intermediate, or high risk of recurrence.

Recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone-assisted radioactive iodine remnant ablation in thyroid cancer patients at intermediate to high risk of recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated successful radioactive iodine remnant ablation (RRA) following preparation with recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone (rhTSH). Short-term studies in relatively low-risk patients have also suggested that rhTSH-stimulated RRA can have an effective adjuvant therapy function in destroying residual microscopic thyroid cancer cells. However, very few of these studies have included a significant number of intermediate or high-risk patients. The goal of this study was to examine clinical outcomes after rhTSH stimulated RRA in a larger cohort of thyroid cancer patients at higher risk of recurrence and disease-specific mortality. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 586 thyroid cancer patients prepared for RRA with either a thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) (n=321) or rhTSH preparation (n=265). The primary end points included both the best response to initial therapy and the clinical status at final follow-up. Clinical outcomes were compared within each of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk groups (low, intermediate, and high) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages (I-IV) based on the method of preparation for RRA (THW vs. rhTSH). RESULTS: Preparation with rhTSH was more likely to be associated with an excellent response to therapy (39.4% for rhTSH vs. 30% for TWH, p=0.03) and fewer additional therapies (29% for rhTSH vs. 37% for TWH, p=0.05) than THW. However, after a median follow-up period of 9 years, the final clinical outcomes were not significantly different with respect to recurrence rates (1.5% for rhTSH vs. 1.2% for TWH), likelihood of having persistent disease (46% for rhTSH vs. 48% for THW) or likelihood of having no evidence of disease (53% for rhTSH vs. 52% for TWH). Furthermore, clinical outcomes were similar between rhTSH and THW preparation across all ATA risk groups and AJCC stages. CONCLUSIONS: rhTSH preparation for RRA is associated with a small, but statistically significant improvement in an initial response to therapy and similar final clinical outcomes across a wide range of risk of recurrence and risk of disease-specific mortality. These data suggest that rhTSH preparation for RRA can be effectively used in intermediate and high-risk patients without known distant metastases.