Fifteen Cases of Endoscopic Treatment of Acute Subdural Hematoma with Small Craniotomy under Local Anesthesia: Endoscopic Hematoma Removal Reduces the Intraoperative Bleeding Amount and the Operative Time Compared with Craniotomy in Patients Aged 70 or Older.

We report cases of acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) treated by endoscopic hematoma removal with a small craniotomy under local anesthesia. From 2015 to 2019, we retrospectively analyzed 15 ASDH patients who were 70 years or older and met our criteria for endoscopic treatment: (1) comorbidities indicated risks associated with a large craniotomy under general anesthesia; (2) decompressive craniectomy was unlikely; and (3) an enlarging hematoma was absent. We also performed a case-control study using the inverse probability weighting method to compare the 15 patients to 20 ASDH patients who were 70 years or older, met criteria (2) and (3), and were treated by craniotomy between 2012 and 2019. Among the 15 ASDH patients, the median age was 86 (range, 70-101) years, and fall was the common cause. The median Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission, operative time, stay time in the operation room, and bleeding amount were 8 (6-15), 91 (48-156) min, 120 (80-205) min, and 20 (5-400) mL, respectively. The extraction rates of all the hematomas exceeded 90%. No patients required conversion to craniotomy under general anesthesia. Three patients had favorable outcomes, and five died. The comparison with craniotomy revealed that the endoscopic procedure reduced the intraoperative bleeding amount, operative time, and stay time in the operation room (p <0.001, p = 0.02, and p <0.001, respectively). In summary, endoscopic hematoma removal for selected ASDH patients aged 70 years or older did not improve functional outcomes but reduced the bleeding amount and the operative time compared with craniotomy.

Endoscopic hematoma removal of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage under local anesthesia reduces operative time compared to craniotomy.

The surgical efficacy for supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains unknown. We compared the advantages of the widely practiced endoscopic hematoma removal under local anesthesia with that of craniotomy under general anesthesia for ICH. We also focused on our novel operative concept of intentional hematoma leaving technique to avoid further damage to the brain. We retrospectively analyzed 134 consecutive patients (66 endoscopies and 68 craniotomies) who were surgically treated for supratentorial ICH. The characteristics of the 134 patients were as follows: The median (interquartile range) age was 73 (61-82) years. The median Glasgow Coma Scale scores at admission, on day 7, and the median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 6 months were 10 (7-13), 13 (10-14), and 4 (3-5) respectively. The statistical comparison revealed there were no differences in GCS score on day seven between the endoscopy 13 (12-14) and craniotomy group 12 (9-14). No differences were observed in mRS scores at 6 months between the endoscopy 4 (2-5) and craniotomy group 4 (3-5). However, the patients treated with our technique tended to have favorable outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed the operative time was significantly decreased in the endoscopy group compared to the craniotomy group (p < 0.001).