Changes in Multiple Aspects of Pain Outcomes After Rehabilitation: Analysis of Pain Data in a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effects of Adding Sensorimotor Training to Manual Therapy and Exercise for Chronic Neck Pain.

OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in pain outcomes to fully evaluate the effect of adding sensorimotor training to manual therapy and exercise in patients with chronic neck pain and sensorimotor deficits. Concordance was examined between pain distribution and pain intensity and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Participants (n=152) were randomly allocated into 4 intervention groups: One group received local neck treatment (NT) comprising manual therapy and exercise and the other 3 groups received additional sensorimotor training (either joint position sense/oculomotor exercises, balance exercises or both). Treatment was delivered twice a week for 6 weeks. Pain and patient-reported outcomes were measured at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: There were greater changes in pain location, extent, and intensity at 6- and 12-month follow-ups in the sensorimotor training groups compared with the NT group ( P <0.05). A greater number of patients in the sensorimotor training groups gained ≥50% reduction in pain extent and intensity relative to the NT group at 6 and 12 months ( P <0.05). Clinical improvement in pain extent was concordant with pain intensity (adjusted kappa=056 to 0.66, %agreement=78.3 to 82.9, P <0.001) and disability (adjusted kappa=0.47 to 0.58, % agreement=73.7 to 79.0, P <0.01) at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups, but not with function and well-being. The concordance tended to decline with time. DISCUSSION: Multiple aspects of the pain experience improved in the longer term by adding sensorimotor training to NT for patients with neck pain and sensorimotor deficits. The concordance between pain and patient-reported outcomes was not always evident and varied over time, suggesting the need for multidimensional assessments of pain.

Reliability of changes in neck pain and cervical rotation range following manual scapular repositioning.

BACKGROUND: Manual scapular repositioning may result in change in neck pain and cervical rotation range. However, the reliability of such changes performed by examiners remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of changes in neck pain and cervical rotation range following manual scapular repositioning performed by two examiners and the agreement between these measures and patients' perceptions of change. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Sixty-nine participants with neck pain and altered scapular position were recruited. Two physiotherapists performed the manual scapular repositioning. Neck pain intensity was measured using a 0-10 numerical scale and cervical rotation range with a cervical range of motion (CROM) device at baseline and in the modified scapular position. Participants' perceptions of any change were rated on a five-item Likert scale. Clinically relevant changes in pain (>2/10) and range (≥7°) were defined as "improved" or "no change" for each measure. RESULTS: ICCs for changes in pain and range between examiners were 0.92 and 0.91. For clinically relevant changes, percent agreement and kappa values between examiners were 82.6%, 0.64 for pain and 84.1%, 0.64 for range. Percent agreement and kappa values between participants' perceptions and measured changes were 76.1%, 0.51 for pain and 77.5%, 0.52 for range. CONCLUSION: Changes in neck pain and rotation range following manual scapular repositioning demonstrated good reliability between examiners. There was moderate agreement between the measured changes and patients' perceptions.

Effectiveness of adding rehabilitation of cervical related sensorimotor control to manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Local neck treatments and sensorimotor training can improve cervical proprioception and balance, but it remains unclear what treatments and treatment combination achieve the best outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the most effective interventions to improve disturbances in joint position sense (JPS) and balance and their effects on neck pain, dizziness and related features in the short- and long-terms. DESIGN: 2x2 factorial, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Participants with neck pain (n = 152) were randomly allocated to one of four intervention groups: i) local neck treatment (NT), ii) NT + JPS/oculomotor exercises (JPS/OC), iii) NT + balance exercises, and iv) all treatments. Participants received 12 treatments over 6 weeks. Primary outcomes were postural sway and joint position error. Secondary outcomes included gait speed, dizziness, pain intensity and disability, cervical range of motion, functional ability, and quality of life. Outcome measures were taken at baseline, posttreatment and 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: All four interventions resulted in short- and long-term improvements in primary and secondary outcomes with medium to large effect sizes, but JPS and balance in neck torsion improved most with the addition of a combined program of JPS/OC + balance exercises to NT while balance in neck neutral improved most with the addition of balance exercises. Adding sensorimotor training was also more effective in maintaining levels of improvement in neck pain and disability at 6- and 12-months. Effect sizes of additional treatment benefits were medium to large. CONCLUSIONS: Adding specific training of JPS/OC and balance to NT best addresses deficits in cervical proprioception and balance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: xxxxx.

Balance Impairment and Effectiveness of Exercise Intervention in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for balance impairment and effectiveness of interventions on balance in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DATA SOURCES: Four electronic databases (Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane Library databases) were searched from inception until June 30, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently searched with keywords focusing on COPD, postural control, and exercise. Cross-sectional studies related to balance and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the effectiveness of exercise intervention on balance outcomes were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data of balance impairment on participants, exercise training on balance outcome measures. Methodological quality of cross-sectional studies was assessed using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool. Methodological quality of RCTs was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and bias was analyzed using the Cochrane risk of bias. DATA SYNTHESIS: A narrative review with descriptive synthesis was used. Fifteen cross-sectional studies and 4 RCTs met the final inclusion criteria. The quality of 10 cross-sectional studies were rated as moderate to high (NIH score≥7). Most studies demonstrated impaired balance in people with COPD than in people without COPD. The quality of all included RCTs was good to excellent (PEDro score=6-9). One RCT had a low risk of bias. Generally, pulmonary rehabilitation program combined with balance training, Tai Chi, and cycling exercise showed significant improvement in balance in people with COPD. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired balance is evident in people with COPD. Available RCTs suggest that exercise interventions may improve balance performance in COPD patients. However, more research on the effect of exercise interventions on balance in COPD patients is still required.

Immediate Effects of Core Stabilization Exercise on ß-Endorphin and Cortisol Levels Among Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Crossover Design.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of the study was to measure the levels of plasma ß-endorphin (PB) and plasma cortisol (PC) under lumbar core stabilization exercise (LCSE), placebo and control conditions in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. METHODS: Twenty-four participants with chronic nonspecific low back pain participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design study. There were 3 experimental exercise conditions: control condition (positioning in crook lying and rest), placebo condition (passive cycling in crook lying using automatic cycler), and LCSE on a Pilates device tested with a 48-hour interval between sessions by concealed randomization. A blood sample was collected before and after the exercise conditions. Plasma ß-endorphin and PC were measured through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and electrochemiluminescence in a Cobas E411 auto analyzer. RESULTS: A significant difference in PB level was identified before and after the LCSE condition (P < .05), whereas no significant differences were noted in control and placebo exercise conditions. Also, the trend of elevation of PB under the LCSE was significantly different compared with the placebo and control conditions (P < .01). In contrast, the PC level remained unchanged in all 3 conditions. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that LCSE could possibly influence PB but not PC level among patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. The mechanism of action of the pain-relieving effect of LCSE might be related to an endogenous opioid mechanism as part of its effects and might not be involved with a stress-induced analgesia mechanism.