Hemophilia gene therapy: first, do no harm.

The introduction of adeno-associated virus-mediated, liver-directed gene therapy into the hemophilia treatment landscape brings not only great promise but also considerable uncertainty to a community that has a history punctuated by the devastating effects of HIV and hepatitis C virus. These infections were introduced into people with hemophilia through the innovation of factor concentrates in the 1970s and 1980s. Concentrates, heralded as a major advance in treatment at the time, brought devastation and death to the community already challenged by the complications of bleeding into joints, vital organs, and the brain. Over the past 5 decades, considerable advances in hemophilia treatment have improved the survival, quality of life, and participation of people with hemophilia, although challenges remain and health equity with their unaffected peers has not yet been achieved. The decision to take a gene therapy product is one in which an informed, holistic, and shared decision-making approach must be employed. Bias on the part of health care professionals and people with hemophilia must be addressed and minimized. Here, we review data leading to the regulatory authorization of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, an adeno-associated virus 5 gene therapy, in Europe to treat hemophilia A and etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb in the United States and Europe to treat hemophilia B. We also provide an overview of the decision-making process and recommend steps that should be taken by the hemophilia community to ensure the safety of and optimal outcomes for people with hemophilia who choose to receive a gene therapy product.

An innovative outcome-based care and procurement model of hemophilia management.

Hemophilia is a rare bleeding disorder associated with spontaneous and post-traumatic bleeding. Each hemophilia patient requires a personalized approach to episodic or prophylactic treatment, but self-management can be challenging for patients, and avoidable bleeding may occur. Patient-tailored care may provide more effective prevention of bleeding, which in turn, may decrease the likelihood of arthropathy and associated chronic pain, missed time from school or work, and progressive loss of mobility. A strategy is presented here aiming to reduce or eliminate bleeding altogether through a holistic approach based on individual patient characteristics. In an environment of budget constraints, this approach would link procurement to patient outcome, adding incentives for all stakeholders to strive for optimal care and, ultimately, a bleed-free world.

Pathobiology of hemophilic synovitis I: overexpression of mdm2 oncogene.

Hemophilia is a genetic disease caused by a deficiency of blood coagulation factor VIII or IX. Bleeding into joints is the most frequent manifestation of hemophilia. Hemarthrosis results in an inflammatory and proliferative disorder termed hemophilic synovitis (HS). In time, a debilitating, crippling arthritis, hemophilic arthropathy, develops. Although the clinical sequence of events from joint bleeding to synovitis to arthropathy is well documented, the component or components in blood and the molecular changes responsible for hemophilic synovitis are not known. Iron has long been suspected to be the culprit but direct evidence has been lacking. Previously, we showed that iron increased human synovial cell proliferation and induced c-myc expression. Here we show that bleeding into a joint in vivo and iron in vitro result in increased expression of the p53-binding protein, mdm2. Iron induced the expression of mdm2 by normal human synovial cells approximately 8-fold. In a murine model of human hemophilia A, hemarthrosis resulted in pathologic changes observed in human hemophilic synovitis and a marked increase in synovial cell proliferation. Iron, in vitro, induced the expression of mdm2. The molecular changes induced by iron in the blood may be the basis of the increase in cell proliferation and the development of hemophilic synovitis.