A public health value-based healthcare paradigm for HIV.

BACKGROUND: HIV patients face considerable acute and chronic healthcare needs and battling the HIV epidemic remains of the utmost importance. By focusing on health outcomes in relation to the cost of care, value-based healthcare (VBHC) proposes a strategy to optimize quality of care and cost-efficiency. Its implementation may provide an answer to the increasing pressure to optimize spending in healthcare while improving patient outcomes. This paper describes a pragmatic value-based healthcare framework for HIV care. METHODS: A value-based HIV healthcare framework was developed during a series of roundtable discussions bringing together 16 clinical stakeholder representatives from the Belgian HIV reference centers and 2 VBHC specialists. Each round of discussions was focused on a central question translating a concept or idea to the next level of practical implementation: 1) how can VBHC principles be translated into value-based HIV care drivers; 2) how can these value-based HIV care divers be translated into value-based care objectives and activities; and 3) how can value-based HIV care objectives and activities be translated into value-based care indicators. Value drivers were linked to concrete objectives and activities using a logical framework approach. Finally, specific, measurable, and acceptable structure, process and outcomes indicators were defined to complement the framework. RESULTS: Our framework identifies 4 core value areas where HIV care would benefit most from improvements: Prevention, improvement of the cascade of care, providing patient-centered HIV care and sustaining a state-of-the-art HIV disease management context. These 4 core value areas were translated into 12 actionable core value objectives. For each objective, example activities were proposed. Indicators are suggested for each level of the framework (outcome indicators for value areas and objectives, process indicators for suggested activities). CONCLUSIONS: This framework approach outlines how to define a patient- and public health centered value-based HIV care paradigm. It proposes how to translate core value drivers to practical objectives and activities and suggests defining indicators that can be used to track and improve the framework's implementation in practice.

Itraconazole for COVID-19: preclinical studies and a proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The antifungal drug itraconazole exerts in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2 in Vero and human Caco-2 cells. Preclinical and clinical studies are required to investigate if itraconazole is effective for the treatment and/or prevention of COVID-19. METHODS: Due to the initial absence of preclinical models, the effect of itraconazole was explored in a clinical, proof-of-concept, open-label, single-center study, in which hospitalized COVID-19 patients were randomly assigned to standard of care with or without itraconazole. Primary outcome was the cumulative score of the clinical status until day 15 based on the 7-point ordinal scale of the World Health Organization. In parallel, itraconazole was evaluated in a newly established hamster model of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission, as soon as the model was validated. FINDINGS: In the hamster acute infection model, itraconazole did not reduce viral load in lungs, stools or ileum, despite adequate plasma and lung drug concentrations. In the transmission model, itraconazole failed to prevent viral transmission. The clinical trial was prematurely discontinued after evaluation of the preclinical studies and because an interim analysis showed no signal for a more favorable outcome with itraconazole: mean cumulative score of the clinical status 49 vs 47, ratio of geometric means 1.01 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.19) for itraconazole vs standard of care. INTERPRETATION: Despite in vitro activity, itraconazole was not effective in a preclinical COVID-19 hamster model. This prompted the premature termination of the proof-of-concept clinical study. FUNDING: KU Leuven, Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Horizon 2020, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Higher versus standard amikacin single dose in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a randomised controlled trial.

Recent studies suggest that intensive care unit patients treated with amikacin frequently do not attain the desired pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target, i.e. peak amikacin concentration (Cpeak) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of ≥8, when a single dose of 15 mg/kg is used. No data are available for patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). The aim of this prospective randomised controlled study was to determine PK/PD target attainment in ED patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock treated with 15 mg/kg versus 25 mg/kg amikacin. Patients were randomly assigned to receive amikacin 25 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg. Amikacin Cpeak values were determined. The primary outcome was target attainment defined as Cpeak/MIC ≥ 8 both using EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints and actually documented MICs as denominator. A total of 104 patients were included. The EUCAST-based target was attained in 76% vs. 40% of patients assigned to the 25 mg/kg vs. 15 mg/kg dose groups (P <0.0001). Target attainment using actual MICs (median of 2 mg/L, documented in 48 isolated Gram-negative pathogens) was achieved in 95% vs. 94% of patients in the 25 mg/kg vs. 15 mg/kg dose groups (P = 0.969). Risk factors associated with PK/PD target failure were identified in the multivariable analysis. At least 25 mg/kg amikacin as a single dose should be used in ED patients with severe sepsis and septic shock to attain the EUCAST-based PK/PD target. However, when using local epidemiology as denominator, 15 mg/kg appears to be sufficient. [ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02365272.

A genotypic assay for the amplification and sequencing of integrase from diverse HIV-1 group M subtypes.

Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA approved the first integrase inhibitor for inclusion in treatment regimens of HIV-1 patients failing their current regimens with multi-drug resistant strains. However, treatment failure has been observed during integrase inhibitor-containing therapy. Several mutational pathways have been described with signature mutations at integrase positions 66, 92, 148 and 155. Therefore, a genotypic assay for the amplification and sequencing of HIV-1 integrase was developed. The assay displayed a detection limit of 10 HIV-1 III(B) RNA copies/ml plasma. As the HIV-1 pandemic is characterised by a large genetic diversity, the new assay was evaluated on a panel of 74 genetically divergent samples belonging to the following genetic forms A, B, C, D, F, G, J, CRF01-AE, CRF02-AG, CRFF03-AB, CRF12-BF and CRF13-cpx. Their viral load ranged from 178 until >500,000 RNA copies/ml. The amplification and sequencing was successful for 70 samples (a success rate of 95%). The four failures were most probably due to low viral load or poor quality of RNA and not to subtype issues. Some of the sequences obtained from integrase inhibitor-naïve patients displayed polymorphisms at integrase positions associated with resistance: 74IV, 138D, 151I, 157Q and 163AE. The relevance of these polymorphisms in the absence of the signature mutations remains unclear.

Performance of the VERSANT HIV-1 resistance assays (LiPA) for detecting drug resistance in therapy-naive patients infected with different HIV-1 subtypes.

In this study we evaluated the performance of the VERSANT HIV-1 Resistance Assays (LiPA) in detecting drug resistance in therapy-naive HIV-infected patients diagnosed in Belgium in 2000. We compared the results with population sequencing and found concordance to be in line with previous studies in treatment-experienced patients (86.87% for reverse transcriptase (RT); 92.77% for protease (PRO)). Discordance was mainly due to indeterminate reactions on LiPA (8.45% for RT; 6.85% for PRO) and minor discordances (4.13% for RT; 0.25% for PRO). Major discordances were rare (0.46% for RT; 0.12% for PRO). Indeterminate reactions were significantly associated with strains belonging to non-B subtypes.