Anticoagulation control with daily low-dose vitamin k to reduce clinically adverse outcomes and international normalized ratio variability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Difficulties managing warfarin therapy have led to speculation that daily supplementation with a low dose of vitamin K might improve anticoagulation control and clinical outcomes. Thus we sought to review the available medical literature systematically examining the effectiveness of low-dose vitamin K supplementation for the reduction of clinically relevant adverse events due to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) use and for stabilization of the international normalized ratio (INR). DESIGN: We searched the Medline and Embase databases, the Cochrane Library, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the U.S. National Institutes of Health clinical trials registry for randomized controlled trials of vitamin K supplementation versus placebo in patients receiving a VKA. We evaluated the outcomes of hemorrhage, thromboembolic events, and percentage of time in therapeutic range (TTR) of INRs by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system for rating quality of evidence in the abstracted studies. SETTING: All randomized controlled trials studies published between 1970 and August 2012 which fitted our search strategy. PATIENTS: Patients over the age of 18 years on VKA therapy. RESULTS: Of the 624 studies we identified and screened, three studies (626 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Most of the patients had a satisfactory TTR at baseline. We found low-quality evidence--downgraded for imprecision and risk of bias (i.e., limitation in study design and/or execution)--of no effect of vitamin K use (100 to 200 µg) on hemorrhagic events (relative risk [RR] 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-64.2) and thromboembolic events (RR 2.2, 95% CI 0.1-47.5) and a significant but clinically unimportant effect on TTR with an absolute increase of 3.5% (95% CI 1.1-6.0). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis, despite the few studies and overall low quality, suggests no beneficial role of low-dose (100 to 200 µg) vitamin K supplementation on the reduction of clinically relevant adverse events in patients taking VKAs, despite a small improvement of the TTR. Data were insufficient, however, from patients with unstable INRs.

Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: High-quality anticoagulation management is required to keep these narrow therapeutic index medications as effective and safe as possible. This article focuses on the common important management questions for which, at a minimum, low-quality published evidence is available to guide best practices. METHODS: The methods of this guideline follow those described in Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement. RESULTS: Most practical clinical questions regarding the management of anticoagulation, both oral and parenteral, have not been adequately addressed by randomized trials. We found sufficient evidence for summaries of recommendations for 23 questions, of which only two are strong rather than weak recommendations. Strong recommendations include targeting an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0 for patients on vitamin K antagonist therapy (Grade 1B) and not routinely using pharmacogenetic testing for guiding doses of vitamin K antagonist (Grade 1B). Weak recommendations deal with such issues as loading doses, initiation overlap, monitoring frequency, vitamin K supplementation, patient self-management, weight and renal function adjustment of doses, dosing decision support, drug interactions to avoid, and prevention and management of bleeding complications. We also address anticoagulation management services and intensive patient education. CONCLUSIONS: We offer guidance for many common anticoagulation-related management problems. Most anticoagulation management questions have not been adequately studied.

Irritable bowel syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) varies depending on the criteria used to diagnose it, but it ranges from about 5% to 20%. IBS is associated with abnormal gastrointestinal motor function and enhanced visceral perception, as well as psychosocial and genetic factors. People with IBS often have other bodily and psychiatric symptoms, and have an increased likelihood of having unnecessary surgery compared with people without IBS. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments in people with IBS? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to July 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 18 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: 5HT(3) receptor antagonists (alosetron and ramosetron); 5HT(4) receptor agonists (tegaserod); antidepressants (tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]); antispasmodics (including peppermint oil); cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT); hypnotherapy; soluble and insoluble fibre supplementation; and loperamide.