Proton pump inhibitors reduce phlebotomy burden in patients with HFE-related hemochromatosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may reduce iron absorption and serum ferritin levels in patients with homeostatic iron regulator (HFE)-related hemochromatosis, reducing the need for frequent phlebotomies. Our study aimed to perform for the first time a meta-analysis of existing observational and randomized controlled studies to ascertain the overall effect of PPI use in patients with HFE-related hemochromatosis. METHODS: Studies in adults reporting the outcomes of PPIs use in hereditary hemochromatosis patients from Medline, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar databases from inception to December 2019 were systematically searched. The study outcomes were the serum ferritin levels and annual requirement for phlebotomies. Pooled mean difference, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained by the random-effects model. Forrest plots were constructed to show the summary pooled estimate. Heterogeneity was assessed by using I2 measure of inconsistency. RESULTS: Following an initial search of 202 manuscripts, a total of three studies involving 68 patients with hemochromatosis (34 in the PPIs group and 34 in the placebo or non-PPI group) were included. A minimum duration of PPI use was 1 year. Patients who received PPIs therapy did not have a statistically significant lower serum ferritin levels (mean difference: -18.86, 95% CI: -60.44, 22.72, P = 0.37, I2 = 88%) but required significantly less sessions of phlebotomies annually (mean difference: -3.10, 95% CI: -4.46, -3.08, P < 0.00001, I2 = 93%). No publication bias was found on Egger (P = 0.94) or Begg (P = 0.98) tests. CONCLUSION: PPIs can be used as an adjuvant therapy to reduce phlebotomy burden in patients with HFE-related hemochromatosis.

Out-of-Pocket Cost Is a Barrier to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly performed to optimize biologic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, patients and physicians may be reluctant to perform TDM due to concerns related to potential out-of-pocket costs. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate patient understanding and attitudes toward TDM in different clinical scenarios with and without potential out-of-pocket costs. METHODS: Adult IBD patients at a tertiary gastroenterology clinic were anonymously surveyed from March to September 2016 to assess their understanding of and willingness to undergo TDM in a variety of clinical scenarios, both with and without a potential out-of-pocket cost. Responses were analyzed for associations with changes in attitudes if out-of-pocket costs were involved. RESULTS: Of 118 completed surveys, 68.2% of patients were aware of or had previously undergone TDM. Patient willingness to undergo TDM was high both with and without potential out-of-pocket costs (70 and 98%, respectively); however, patients were significantly less willing with out-of-pocket cost (p < 0.01). Higher disease-related quality of life scores, as measured by the short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (SIBDQ), was significantly associated with an increased willingness to assume a potential out-of-pocket cost (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients understand and are willing to undergo TDM in certain potentially beneficial clinical scenarios, however, are significantly less willing if paying out-of-pocket. A higher SIBDQ score was associated with an increase in willingness to undergo TDM when out-of-pocket cost was involved. Physicians should discuss TDM with their patients in order to make an informed and personalized treatment decision.