Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Scott Med J ; 66(2): 58-65, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33459189

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In view of changing landscape of surgical treatment for LUTS secondary to BPE, this audit was undertaken to assess key aspects of the processes and outcomes of the current interventional treatments for BPE, across different units in the UK. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A multi-institutional snapshot audit was conducted for patients undergoing interventions for LUTS/BPE over 8-week period. Using Delphi process two-part proforma was designed to capture data. RESULTS: 529 patients were included across 20 NHS trusts in England and Wales. Median age was 73 years. Indications for surgery were acute retention (47%) and LUTS (45%). 80% of patients had prior medical therapy. TURP formed the commonest procedure. 27% patients had <23 hour hospital stay. Immediate (21%) and delayed (18%) complications were Clavien-Dindo <2 category. High proportion of patients reported residual symptoms. Type and indication of surgery were significant predictor of complications, length of stay and failure of TWOC outcomes, on multivariate analyses. There were variations in departmental processes, 50% centres used PROMs. CONCLUSION: Monopolar TURP still remains the commonest intervention for BPE. Most departments are adopting newer technologies. The audit identified opportunities for development of consistent, effective and patient centric practices as well as need for large-scale focused studies.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Idoso , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
2.
J Urol ; 205(3): 653-663, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026903

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We identify which nonantibiotic strategies could reduce the risk of infectious complications following prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search on MEDLINE®, Embase® and the Cochrane Database for randomized controlled trials (inception to May 2020) assessing nonantibiotic interventions in prostate biopsy. Primary outcome was pooled infectious complications (fever, sepsis and symptomatic urinary tract infection) and secondary outcome was hospitalization. Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE approach were used to assess the bias and the certainty of evidence. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015026354). RESULTS: A total of 90 randomized controlled trials (16,941 participants) were included in the analysis, with 83 trials being categorized into one of 10 different interventions. Transperineal biopsy was associated with significantly reduced infectious complications as compared to transrectal biopsy (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.92, p=0.02, I2=0%, 1,330 participants, 7 studies). Rectal preparation with povidone-iodine was also shown to reduce infectious complications (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.65, p <0.000001, I2=27%, 1,686 participants, 8 studies) as well as hospitalization (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.69, p=0.002, I2=0%, 620 participants, 4 studies). We found no difference in infectious complications/hospitalization for 6 other interventions, ie number of biopsy cores, periprostatic nerve block, number of injections for periprostatic nerve block, needle guide type, needle type and rectal preparation with enema. In 2 interventions (needle diameter, rectal preparation with chlorhexidine) meta-analysis was not possible. Finally, 7 studies had unique interventions. The certainty of evidence was rated as low/very low for all interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal biopsy significantly reduces infectious complications compared to transrectal biopsy and should therefore be preferred. If transrectal biopsy is performed, rectal preparation with povidone-iodine is highly recommended. The other investigated nonantibiotic strategies did not significantly influence infection and hospitalization after prostate biopsy.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/microbiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Povidona-Iodo/uso terapêutico , Próstata/patologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Biópsia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
3.
Curr Opin Urol ; 30(6): 845-852, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33009152

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of most common infections in everyday clinical practice. Given the increase in antimicrobial therapy resistance, there has been an increased interest in nonantibiotic treatment options for common infections. RECENT FINDINGS: A review of the recent literature including on nonantibiotic options for management of UTIs, symptoms of cystitis and prevention of recurrent UTIs. SUMMARY: The article provides an overview on alternative therapy to antibiotics in the treatment of cystitis and recurrent UTI prophylaxis, including alkalinization of urine, cranberry products, probiotics, NSAIDS, D-mannose, herbal medicine, methenamine hippurate, oral immunostimulants (immunotherapy), topical oestrogens, vitamins and acupuncture. The last few years of intense research has focused on an effort to find evidence to corroborate potentially efficacious non antibiotic treatments. However, alternative treatments for UTIs have not brought conclusive evidence that antibiotic usage can be replaced completely by nonantibiotic options. The reason for this is largely due to a lack of good-quality randomized controlled trials on this subject.


Assuntos
Terapias Complementares/métodos , Cistite , Infecções Urinárias , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cistite/terapia , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Fitoterapia , Recidiva , Infecções Urinárias/terapia , Urina/química
4.
Eur Urol Focus ; 5(1): 20-28, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30503175

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Prostate biopsy is one of the most performed procedures in urology. As a diagnostic procedure it should be of low risk. However, morbidity following prostate biopsy is common due to infectious complications. OBJECTIVE: To describe how to reduce infectious complications following prostate biopsy. We report on antibiotic and technical interventions to reduce infectious complications. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The data presented are based on a narrative review. Search in PubMed and Medline was performed until May 2018 with a focus on randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses. Articles were reviewed for data on symptomatic infections, hospitalisation, and adverse events. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Antibiotic prophylaxis is the standard of care. However, the duration of antibiotic preemptive treatment is still under debate. The use of augmented antibiotic prophylaxis as well as targeted antibiotic prophylaxis might be of potential value, but evidence is currently limited. Moreover, no antibiotic class was shown to be clearly superior to another. The evaluation of the technical aspects during prostate biopsy reveals that rectal preparation with povidone-iodine is clearly effective to reduce infectious complications. Transperineal biopsy has a potential benefit to reduce infectious complications, but powerful randomised controlled studies are missing. Finally, the number of biopsy cores, the application of periprostatic nerve block, or the use of a cleansing enema has no impact on prostate biopsy in terms of infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: The available data only suggest that rectal preparation with povidone-iodine as well as antibiotic prophylaxis is of significant advantage to reduce infectious complications following prostate biopsy. The augmented and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis shows some potential, but need further validation. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this review we evaluate the best management strategy to prevent infectious complications following prostate biopsy. We show that antibiotic prophylaxis is essential for prostate biopsy and that rectal preparation with povidone-iodine is mandatory.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Povidona-Iodo/administração & dosagem , Próstata/microbiologia , Administração Retal , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Metanálise como Assunto , Povidona-Iodo/uso terapêutico , Próstata/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
6.
Curr Urol Rep ; 17(9): 68, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27492610

RESUMO

Bladder cancer is the second commonest urinary tract malignancy with 70-80 % being non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) at diagnosis. Patients with high-risk NMIBC (T1/Tis, with high grade/G3, or CIS) represent a challenging group as they are at greater risk of recurrence and progression. Intravesical Bacilli Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is commonly used as first line therapy in this patient group but there is a current worldwide shortage. BCG has been shown to reduce recurrence in high-risk NMIBC and is more effective that other intravesical agents including mitomycin C, epirubicin, interferon-alpha and gemcitabine. Primary cystectomy offers a high change of cure in this cohort (80-90 %) and is a more radical treatment option which patients need to be counselled carefully about. Bladder thermotherapy and electromotive drug administration with mitomycin C are alternative therapies with promising short-term results although long-term follow-up data are lacking.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Vacina BCG , Cistectomia , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida , Imunoterapia , Mitomicina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA