Outbreak of Escherichia coli O104:H4 haemolytic uraemic syndrome in France: outcome with eculizumab.

BACKGROUND: An outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) due to Shiga toxin-secreting Escherichia coli (STEC) O104:H4 from contaminated fenugreek sprouts occurred in June 2011 near Bordeaux, France. In the context of this outbreak, all patients were treated with the monoclonal anti-C5 antibody, eculizumab. METHODS: The diagnosis of HUS was made based on haemolytic anaemia, low platelet count and acute kidney injury. Data were obtained from initial gastrointestinal symptoms to the end of follow-up 10 weeks after the start of eculizumab. RESULTS: Among 24 cases of STEC gastroenteritis, HUS developed in nine patients (eight adults and one child), 6 (median; range 3-12) days after digestive symptoms begun. The median (range) highest or lowest biological values were platelet count 26 (range 14-93) G/L; haemoglobin 6.6 (range 5-10.7) g/dL; LDH 1520 (range 510-2568) IU/L; creatinine 152 (range 48-797) µmol/L. All patients had extra-renal complications (liver 9, pancreas 5, brain 3 and heart 3). Two patients were dialysed, and one was ventilated. After failure of plasma exchange to increase platelets in the first three patients, eculizumab was administered in all nine patients, 0-4 days after HUS diagnosis (median 1 day). One patient with very severe neurological HUS received immunoadsorption. Outcome was favourable in all patients, with rapid normalization of haemoglobin, platelets, LDH levels, renal function and neurological improvement. There were no deaths and no serious adverse events related to eculizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment of O104:H4 STEC-HUS by eculizumab was associated with a rapid and efficient recovery. Controlled prospective evaluation of eculizumab in STEC-HUS is warranted.

Long-term outcome on renal replacement therapy in patients who previously received a keto acid-supplemented very-low-protein diet.

BACKGROUND: The consequences of a supplemented very-low-protein diet remain a matter of debate with regard to patient outcome before or after the onset of renal replacement therapy. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the long-term clinical outcome during maintenance dialysis and/or transplantation in patients who previously received a supplemented very-low-protein diet. DESIGN: We assessed the outcome of 203 patients who received a supplemented very-low-protein diet for >3 mo (inclusion period: 1985-2000) and started dialysis after a mean diet duration of 33.1 mo (4-230 mo). RESULTS: The survival rate in the whole cohort was 79% and 63% at 5 and 10 y, respectively. One hundred two patients continued with chronic dialysis during the entire follow-up, and 101 patients were grafted at least once. Patient outcomes were similar to those of the French Dialysis Registry patients for the dialysis group and similar to the 865 patients who were transplanted in Bordeaux during the same period for the transplant group. There was no correlation between death rate and duration of diet. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of correlation between death rate and duration of diet and the moderate mortality rate observed during the first 10 y of renal replacement therapy confirm that a supplemented very-low-protein diet has no detrimental effect on the outcome of patients with chronic kidney disease who receive renal replacement therapy.

Restricted protein diet is associated with decrease in proteinuria: consequences on the progression of renal failure.

OBJECTIVE: Reduction of proteinuria is associated with a slower progression of renal failure. We questioned whether the change in proteinuria in response to a supplemented very low protein diet (SVLPD), which is known to reduce proteinuria, could function as a marker of the potential renoprotective effect of an SVLPD. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: In the 220 consecutive patients of our previously published cohort, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was assessed every 3 months using the (51)Cr-EDTA method. Seventy-eight patients (mean age 52 +/- 17 years, body mass index 23 +/- 3 kg/m(2), GFR 15 +/- 6 mL/min) exhibited a proteinuria more than 1 g per day at the start of the regimen. Mean protein intake assessed by urinary nitrogen appearance was 0.42 +/- 0.24 g/kg per day at 4 months. The median follow-up was 24 months. RESULTS: Proteinuria decreased significantly after patients were treated with an SVLPD. The maximum mean percent reduction was attained at 3 months (47% +/- 27%), was not influenced by the levels of baseline proteinuria, and was similar in patients receiving or not receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition at the start of the study. The percent reduction and the residual proteinuria at 3 months predicted the rate of the later GFR decline. GFR decline was significantly lower in patients whose reduction in proteinuria at 3 months was higher than 50% (0.42 +/- 0.37 mL/min/mo vs. 0.10 +/- 0.15 mL/min/mo and 1.0 +/- 0.6 mL/min/mo vs. 0.15 +/- 0.19 mL/min/mo, P < .001 in patients with proteinuria higher or lesser than 3 g/d at start, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results do not differ from those reported with therapies antagonizing angiotensin II formation and/or activity aiming at reducing proteinuria in chronic renal diseases.

Nutrition in hemodialysis patients previously on a supplemented very low protein diet.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional safety of protein-restricted diets in patients with chronic renal failure is controversial. In the present study, we have assessed the evolution of nutritional status after initiation of hemodialysis in patients previously treated by a supplemented very low protein diet (SVLPD). METHODS: Nutritional data were prospectively collected during the first year of hemodialysis from 15 consecutive patients treated with a SVLPD (0.3 g protein/kg/day supplemented with essential amino acids, calcium, iron, and vitamins) and compared to 15 age- and gender-matched end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients previously on a less-restricted diet (0.90 +/- 0.21 g protein/kg/day) who started hemodialysis during the same period. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was used to assess body composition at 0, 6, and 12 months. Hemodialysis prescriptions, biologic data and 3-day food records were collected every 3 months. RESULTS: Protein intake was higher than 1.2 g/kg/day in both groups as soon as 3 months after the start of hemodialysis. Albumin and prealbumin increased significantly during the first 6 months in all patients. Body mass index (BMI) increased in all patients (+0.97 +/- 1.31 kg/m2; P < 0.001) reflecting a gain in fat mass in the overall population (+2.36 +/- 2.94 kg/m2; P < 0.001) while lean body mass remained stable overall. CONCLUSION: Once on hemodialysis, SVLPD patients rapidly increased protein intake. Nutritional status improved in all patients, with a gain in fat mass in all, and a gain in lean body mass in SVLPD men only. These data indicate that treatment with a SVLPD prior to hemodialysis initiation is nutritionally safe.