Treatment and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer Stage IIIA diagnosed in 1989-1994: a study in the region of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre East, The Netherlands.

The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the treatment policy and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical stage IIIA in daily practice. We selected 212 patients, who had been diagnosed between 1989 and 1994 and registered by the Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Centre East (CCCE). Diagnostic tests comprised chest X-ray and bronchoscopy in all cases but one, computed tomography in 89%, mediastinoscopy in 55% and conventional tomography of the chest in 16%. NSCLC had been verified histologically in 88% and cytologically in 12%. The initial treatment for the primary tumor had been surgery alone in 13% of the patients, surgery plus radiotherapy in 8%, radiotherapy alone in 56%, chemotherapy in 1% (three patients, one in addition to surgery); 22% received none of these treatments. Median survival of the 212 patients was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval 8.3-11.0 months). Overall survival rates after 1, 2 and 3 years were 41, 17 and 8%, respectively. Three-year survival of the patients who had undergone surgery, surgery plus radiotherapy, radiotherapy alone and no treatment was 18, 19, 6 and 4%, respectively. Treatment was an independent prognostic factor (multivariate Cox's proportional hazards analysis adjusted for sub-stage, age, number of co-morbid diseases and hospital). In the same model, the Hazard rate ratio for one hospital relative to the five others was 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.8). Surgery (whether or not in combination with radiotherapy) independently gave the best results. In conclusion, policies varied between hospitals, although the variation in overall survival was small except at one hospital. New regional management guidelines are in preparation. Physicians will be encouraged to follow these guidelines, both with regard to diagnostic tests and to treatment policies, as our study showed that differences in policy might lead to differences in survival.

Work environment and prostate cancer risk.

A case-referent study of 345 prostate cancer cases and 1,346 referents was carried out in the Netherlands to investigate the relationship between work environment and prostate cancer risk. Cases were selected from the Cancer Registry of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre IKO. Referents (men diagnosed with benign prostate hyperplasia) were recruited with assistance of the pathology laboratories in the IKO region. Questionnaires were mailed to all subjects to obtain information on their work history and occupational exposure. Moreover, workers in farming (n = 323), and in metal work and maintenance (n = 340), were requested to complete short supplements to the questionnaire inquiring in more detail into specific types of exposure. Significantly elevated risks were found for work in food manufacturing and for bookkeepers. Significantly elevated odds ratios (OR) were also observed for jobs held between 1960 and 1970 in administration, in storage, or as farm laborer. In addition, a statistically significant excess risk was found for subjects who reported frequent occupational exposure to cadmium. Cases who worked in farming applied pesticides during significant more days per year than the referents did. A nonsignificantly elevated OR was found for maintenance of tractors and agricultural machinery. Among metal workers, mechanics, and repairmen, nonsignificantly increased ORs were observed with regard to the use of acids, solvents, iron, and steel, and for welding and maintenance of machinery.

Cancer incidence: life table risk versus cumulative risk.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study differences between various methods of estimating cancer risk in individuals. DESIGN: Information was obtained from a cancer registry. Lifetime risk was calculated using the life table method, taking competing causes of death into account and using well recognised methods such as the cumulative rate and risk. SETTING: Regional cancer registry of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre IKL, located in Maastricht, The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Patients with a first primary malignancy in 1989-90 in the catchment area of the cancer registry. MAIN RESULTS: The lifetime risk of developing cancer was estimated to be 34.8% for males and 30.4% for females. In males, especially, the risk estimates were considerably higher when the cumulative risk was used. CONCLUSIONS: The life table method is convenient for estimating the probability that a person will develop cancer during a defined period or during his or her lifetime. The other estimates overestimate the risk of the disease under investigation, especially in the very elderly.

Swimming and the risk of cutaneous melanoma.

Recreational exposure to the sun may not explain fully current trends in melanoma incidence. The hypothesis was examined whether carcinogens in water play a role in the development of cutaneous melanoma. In a case-control study, 128 melanoma patients and 168 patients with other types of malignancy completed a detailed questionnaire on aquatic leisure time activities. All relative risk estimates were adjusted for age, gender, educational level, pigmentation characteristics, and exposure to sun habits. Regular swimming during the summer months in swimming pools and in open waters such as rivers and seas before the age of 15 years, was associated with odds ratios of 2.20 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-4.62) and 2.41 (95% CI, 1.04-5.58), respectively, compared with no swimming at all or swimming in relatively unpolluted waters, such as lakes and fens. Melanoma patients learned to swim at a younger age; compared with those who never learned to swim or who learned to swim after the age of 12 years, the odds ratio was 1.87 (95% CI, 0.91-3.78) for those who learned to swim at ages 9-12 years, and 2.22 (95% CI, 1.16-4.26) for those who learned to swim before 9 years of age. Compared with persons who had no swimming certificates, an odds ratio of 1.25 (95% CI, 0.71-2.23) was found for persons with one or two certificates, and an odds ratio of 2.96 (95% CI, 1.25-6.96) for persons with three or more certificates. The positive association between a history of swimming and melanoma risk suggests that carcinogenic agents in water, possibly chlorination by products, play a role in melanoma aetiology.