Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial.

CONTEXT: Patients with periampullary adenocarcinomas undergo the same resectional surgery as that of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Although adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to have a survival benefit for pancreatic cancer, there have been no randomized trials for periampullary adenocarcinomas. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy (fluorouracil or gemcitabine) provides improved overall survival following resection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC)-3 periampullary trial, an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial (July 2000-May 2008) in 100 centers in Europe, Australia, Japan, and Canada. Of the 428 patients included in the primary analysis, 297 had ampullary, 96 had bile duct, and 35 had other cancers. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred forty-four patients were assigned to the observation group, 143 patients to receive 20 mg/m2 of folinic acid via intravenous bolus injection followed by 425 mg/m2 of fluorouracil via intravenous bolus injection administered 1 to 5 days every 28 days, and 141 patients to receive 1000 mg/m2 of intravenous infusion of gemcitabine once a week for 3 of every 4 weeks for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was overall survival with chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy; secondary measures were chemotherapy type, toxic effects, progression-free survival, and quality of life. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (61%) in the observation group, 83 (58%) in the fluorouracil plus folinic acid group, and 73 (52%) in the gemcitabine group died. In the observation group, the median survival was 35.2 months (95%% CI, 27.2-43.0 months) and was 43.1 (95%, CI, 34.0-56.0) in the 2 chemotherapy groups (hazard ratio, 0.86; (95% CI, 0.66-1.11; χ2 = 1.33; P = .25). After adjusting for independent prognostic variables of age, bile duct cancer, poor tumor differentiation, and positive lymph nodes and after conducting multiple regression analysis, the hazard ratio for chemotherapy compared with observation was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.57-0.98; Wald χ2 = 4.53, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma, adjuvant chemotherapy, compared with observation, was not associated with a significant survival benefit in the primary analysis; however, multivariable analysis adjusting for prognostic variables demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit associated with adjuvant chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00058201.

Interobserver variation in the reporting of local peritoneal involvement and extramural venous invasion in colonic cancer.

AIMS: Local peritoneal involvement (LPI) and extramural venous invasion (EMVI) are of prognostic value in Dukes' B colonic cancers and may be used to select patients for adjuvant chemotherapy. There is marked variation in the frequency with which they are reported however, ranging from 7% to 39% and 10% to 90%, respectively. A grading system for diagnosing LPI has been proposed by Shepherd et al. and partially incorporated into the Royal College of Pathologists guidelines for reporting colorectal cancer. This study aimed to determine the degree of interobserver variation in the reporting of LPI and EMVI amongst a group of experienced pathologists with a special interest in gastrointestinal pathology. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four pathologists specialising in gastrointestinal pathology independently assessed LPI according to the grading system described by Shepherd et al. and the presence or absence of EMVI on 138 and 131 slides of pT3 and pT4 colonic cancers, respectively. Kappa statistics were performed to assess interobserver agreement. Kappa values for LPI ranged from kappa = 0.74 (substantial agreement) to kappa = 0.89 (almost perfect agreement). Kappa values for EMVI ranged from kappa = 0.29 (poor agreement) to kappa = 0.59 (moderate agreement). CONCLUSIONS: Using Shepherd's grading system there was good agreement between pathologists in reporting LPI in colonic carcinomas. The reporting of EMVI in colonic carcinomas on haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides had only poor to moderate agreement however, even amongst gastrointestinal pathologists working together in a single unit. Introduction of standardized criteria and/or the use of an elastin stain in the diagnosis of EMVI may assist in improving interobserver agreement.