Evaluation of vitamin K status and rationale for vitamin K supplementation in dialysis patients.

The cardinal biological role of vitamin K is to act as cofactor for the carboxylation of a number of vitamin K-dependent proteins, some of which are essential for coagulation, bone formation and prevention of vascular calcification. Functional vitamin K deficiency is common and severe among dialysis patients and has garnered attention as a modifiable risk factor in this population. However, no single biochemical parameter can adequately assess vitamin K status. For each biological function of vitamin K, the degree of carboxylation of the relevant vitamin K-dependent protein most accurately reflects vitamin K status. Dephosphorylated uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein (dp-ucMGP) is the best biomarker for vascular vitamin K status when cardiovascular endpoints are studied. Dp-ucMGP levels are severely elevated in haemodialysis patients and correlate with markers of vascular calcification and mortality in some but not all studies. The aetiology of vitamin K deficiency in haemodialysis is multifactorial, including deficient intake, uraemic inhibition of the vitamin K cycle and possibly interference of vitamin K absorption by phosphate binders. The optimal vitamin K species, dose and duration of supplementation to correct vitamin K status in dialysis patients are unknown. Dp-ucMGP levels dose-proportionally decrease with supraphysiological vitamin K2 supplementation, but do not normalize even with the highest doses. In the general population, long-term vitamin K1 or K2 supplementation has beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease, bone density and fracture risk, and insulin resistance, although some studies reported negative results. In haemodialysis patients, several trials on the effects of vitamin K on surrogate markers of vascular calcification are currently ongoing.

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Vitamin K Antagonist Replacement by Rivaroxaban with or without Vitamin K2 in Hemodialysis Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: the Valkyrie Study.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), although commonly used to reduce thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation, have been incriminated as probable cause of accelerated vascular calcification (VC) in patients on hemodialysis. Functional vitamin K deficiency may further contribute to their susceptibility for VC. We investigated the effect of vitamin K status on VC progression in 132 patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation treated with VKAs or qualifying for anticoagulation. METHODS: Patients were randomized to VKAs with target INR 2-3, rivaroxaban 10 mg daily, or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily plus vitamin K2 2000 µg thrice weekly during 18 months. Systemic dp-ucMGP levels were quantified to assess vascular vitamin K status. Cardiac and thoracic aorta calcium scores and pulse wave velocity were measured to evaluate VC progression. RESULTS: Baseline dp-ucMGP was severely elevated in all groups. Initiation or continuation of VKAs further increased dp-ucMGP, whereas levels decreased in the rivaroxaban group and to a larger extent in the rivaroxaban+vitamin K2 group, but remained nevertheless elevated. Changes in coronary artery, thoracic aorta, and cardiac valve calcium scores and pulse wave velocity were not significantly different among the treatment arms. All cause death, stroke, and cardiovascular event rates were similar between the groups. Bleeding outcomes were not significantly different, except for a lower number of life-threatening and major bleeding episodes in the rivaroxaban arms versus the VKA arm. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of VKAs and high-dose vitamin K2 improve vitamin K status in patients on hemodialysis, but have no significant favorable effect on VC progression. Severe bleeding complications may be lower with rivaroxaban than with VKAs.

Is folate a promising agent in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease in patients with renal failure?

Management of the conventional cardiovascular risk factors is insufficient to prevent the dramatic increase in atherosclerotic cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with renal failure. Folate recently received attention as a potential alternative treatment option to decrease the excess cardiovascular risk in the uremic population. Folate administration is the principal treatment modality for hyperhomocysteinemia. Hyperhomocysteinemia is prevalent in more than 85% of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is independently associated with increased odds for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Several attempts have been made to normalize homocysteine levels in uremic patients with folate-based vitamin regimens. Although supraphysiologic doses of folic acid afford greater reductions in homocysteine levels than standard doses, the response to treatment is generally only partial and the large majority of ESRD patients have residual hyperhomocysteinemia. Several defects in folate metabolism have been described in uremia, which may explain the relative folate resistance in patients with renal failure, but their clinical relevance remains uncertain. It appears unlikely that the hyperhomocysteinemia in ESRD can be cured solely with folic acid supplements, since folate does not affect the prolonged plasma elimination of homocysteine, which is the primary defect in homocysteine metabolism in uremia. Folate restores endothelial dysfunction, associated with hyperlipidemia, diabetes and hyperhomocysteinemia. The beneficial effect appears to be independent of its homocysteine-lowering capacity and is possibly related to an improved bioavailability of nitric oxide. However, folate has failed to improve endothelial dysfunction in uremic patients. In the ESRD population, multiple metabolic and hemodynamic abnormalities adversely affect endothelial function. In addition, irreversible structural vascular disease already may be present. Folate should, therefore, probably be an integral part of an "endothelial protective regimen," consisting of lipid-lowering agents, antihypertensives and antioxidant vitamins and started very early in patients with renal failure. Before large-scale folate administration can be recommended, effects on hard endpoints of cardiovascular disease need to be demonstrated in randomized trials. Such trials are currently underway in patients with normal renal function at high risk for cardiovascular disease, and one trial has recently been initiated in stable renal transplant recipients.