Efficacy of generic meropenem products in combination with colistin in carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae experimental osteomyelitis.

Guidelines for the management of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) infections recommend a combination of two active agents, including meropenem if the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is ≤8 mg/L. The therapeutic equivalence of meropenem generics has been challenged. We compared the bactericidal activity of meropenem innovator (AstraZeneca) and four generic products (Actavis, Kabi, Mylan and Panpharma), both in vitro and in vivo, in association with colistin. In vitro time-kill studies were performed at 4 × MIC. An experimental model of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae osteomyelitis was induced in rabbits by tibial injection of a sclerosing agent followed by 2 × 108 CFU of K. pneumoniae KPC-99YC (meropenem MIC = 4 mg/L; colistin MIC = 1 mg/L). At 14 days after inoculation, treatment for 7 days started in seven groups of ≥10 rabbits, including a control group, a colistin group, and one group for each meropenem product (i.e. the innovator and four generics), in combination with colistin. In vitro, meropenem + colistin was bactericidal with no viable bacteria after 6 h, and this effect was similar with all meropenem products. In the osteomyelitis model, there was no significant difference between meropenem generics and the innovator when combined with colistin. Colistin-resistant strains were detected after treatment with colistin + meropenem innovator (n = 3) and generics (n = 3). The efficacy of four meropenem generics did not differ from the innovator in vitro and in an experimental rabbit model of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae osteomyelitis in terms of bactericidal activity and the emergence of resistance.

Colistin-containing cement spacer for treatment of experimental carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae prosthetic joint infection.

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are emerging multidrug-resistant bacteria responsible for invasive infections, including prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Local administration of colistin may provide bactericidal concentrations in situ. This study evaluated the efficacy of a colistin-impregnated cement spacer, alone and in combination with systemic antibiotics, in a rabbit model of CPE-PJI. Elution of 3 MIU of colistimethate sodium (CMS) in 40 g of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement was studied in vitro. In vivo, 5 × 108 CFU of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (colistin and meropenem MICs of 1 mg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively) were injected close to a prosthetic knee. Surgical debridement and prosthesis removal were performed 7 days later, and rabbits were assigned to six treatment groups (11-13 rabbits each): drug-free spacer; colistin-loaded spacer; colistin intramuscular (i.m.); colistin i.m. + colistin spacer; colistin i.m. + meropenem subcutaneous (s.c.); and colistin i.m. + meropenem s.c. + colistin spacer. Systemic treatment was administered at doses targeting pharmacokinetics in humans, and rabbits were euthanised 7 days later to evaluate bacterial counts in infected bones. In vitro, CMS elution was low (<0.1% at 24 h) but reached a local concentration of ≥20 mg/L (>20 × MIC). In vivo, combinations of local and systemic colistin, with or without meropenem, were the only regimens superior to the control group (P ≤ 0.05) in terms of viable bacterial counts and the proportion of rabbits with sterile bone, with no emergence of colistin-resistant strains. Colistin-loaded cement spacer in combination with systemic antibiotics were the most effective regimens in this CPE-PJI model.

Moxifloxacin-rifampicin combination for the treatment of non-staphylococcal Gram-positive orthopedic implant-related infections.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of the moxifloxacin-rifampicin combination in non-staphylococcal Gram-positive orthopedic implant-related infections. METHODS: Patients treated with the moxifloxacin-rifampicin combination for an implant-related infection from November 2014 to November 2016 were retrospectively identified from the database of the referral centers for bone and joint infections in Western France. RESULTS: Twenty-three cases of infection due to Streptococcus spp. (n=12), Cutibacteriumacnes (n=6), and Enterococcus faecalis (n=5) were included. Ten patients with hip prosthesis were included. Infection was polymicrobial in 11 cases. According to the MIC, moxifloxacin was 1.5 to 11.7 times as active as levofloxacin against non-staphylococcal Gram-positive bacteria. We reported an 81.8% success rate, and no severe adverse effect. CONCLUSION: The moxifloxacin-rifampicin combination is a valuable alternative for the treatment of non-staphylococcal Gram-positive implant-related infections because of the good activity of moxifloxacin against these bacteria and the potential activity on the biofilm.