[Nifedipine or nicardipine in management of threatened preterm delivery: an observational population-based study]. / Utilisation de la nifédipine et de la nicardipine dans le traitement de la menace d'accouchement prématurée: données observationnelles en population.

OBJECTIVE: For the first line tocolysis, calcium channel blockers (CCB)--oral nifedipine (Adalate®) or intravenous nicardipine (Loxen®)--are frequently used in France. No study compared nifedipine and nicardipine in management of threatened preterm delivery. From data of a French observational study, we compared factors associated with the use of nifedipine and nicardipine. Efficacy and tolerance of the two treatments were also compared. METHODS: It was a secondary analysis of EVAPRIMA study, a practice survey describing management of threatened preterm delivery in 107 French maternity units. Only women who received calcium channel blockers in their first line tocolytic therapy were included. We studied obstetrical factors associated with the choice of nifedipine or nicardipine. We also analyzed factors associated with a delivery within seven days following admission using univariate and multivariate analysis. Adverse secondary effects were compared between women who received nifedipine or nicardipine. RESULTS: Three hundred and four women received calcium channel blockers for their first line tocolytic therapy, in 73 maternity units: 93 (30.6%) women received oral nifedipine and 211 (69.4%) intravenous nicardipine. The same CCB was always prescribed in 69 maternity units. Admission after in utero transfer was less frequent among women who received nifedipine (6.5% versus 17.1%, P=0.01). Premature rupture of the membranes was also less frequent among women who received nifedipine (4.3% versus 13.7%, P=0.02), in comparison with women who received nicardipine. Median duration between admission for threatened preterm labor and delivery was longer when nifedipine was used (44 days versus 36 days, P=0.04). After adjustment on obstetrical factors, the risk to have a delivery within 7 days following admission was not significantly different between nifedipine and nicardipine groups (adjusted OR=0.5 [0.2-1.2]). Among women who received nifedipine only two cases (2.1%) of adverse event were reported with only one case needing a switch of treatment. Thirteen (6.2%) cases of adverse event were reported among women who received nicardipine (P=0.16); in three cases it motivated a switch. However, due to bias and limits inherent in such studies, our results should be interpreted cautiously. CONCLUSION: Nicardipine is the first choice for French obstetricians in management of severe threatened preterm delivery. However, intravenous nicardipine does not increase gestational duration in comparison with oral nifedipine.

[Perinatal management and neurological outcome of newborns hospitalized with Rhesus hemolytic disease]. / Prise en charge périnatale et devenir neurologique à moyen terme des nouveau-nés hospitalisés pour maladie hémolytique par immunisation anti-D.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate perinatal management and neurological outcome in a group of infants born with Rhesus fetomaternal allo-immunization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1 January and 31 December 2005, all newborns admitted to neonatal unit of Rouen tertiary centre for Rhesus hemolytic disease were included in a retrospective study and divided in two groups. The newborns who were treated with intrauterine transfusion are in the group 1 and those who needed only postnatal treatment in the group 2. In each case, were considered antenatal management (ultrasonographic data, middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity, intrauterine transfusion), postnatal treatment (phototherapy, exchange transfusion, transfusion requirements) and neurological outcome. RESULTS: Among 42 cases of Rhesus allo-immunization observed in six years, 28 newborns (67%) were admitted for neonatal cares. No case of fetal hydrops was noted. But 16/28 (57%) were preterm with a median term of 35 weeks gestation (32-36 weeks). In group 1 of six infants who had received intrauterine transfusion (IUT), only one (17%) needed postnatal exchange transfusion, and all six received one to three blood transfusions after their birth. In group 2 of 22 infants who did not receive IUT, 6/22 (27%) needed postnatal exchange and 18/22 (82%) of them received one to four blood transfusions. Phototherapy duration and albumin requirements were similar in both groups. Three deaths occurred, one due to necrotizing enterocolitis and the other two later on due to sudden infant death and fulminant meningococcemia. Neurological outcome of the remaining 25 children was normal. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Rhesus alloimmunization remain a situation at risk. Neonatal clinical presentation is less severe than previously described due to improvement in antenatal management. Infants required less postnatal exchange transfusion when they received intrauterine transfusion but more frequent blood transfusions.

[Gas embolism and hyperbaric oxygen treatment during pregnancy: a case report and a review of the literature]. / Embolies gazeuses et thérapie par oxygénation hyperbare pendant la grossesse. A propos d'un cas et revue de la littérature.

We report the first case of a pregnant woman presenting with a paradoxical air embolism due to accidental removal of a central venous catheter. Secondary right hemiplegia associated with a confused state justified emergency hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which was followed by complete neurological recovery. The aim of this case report is to assess risk situations of gas embolism during pregnancy and puerperium, as well as indications and fetal effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy.