A review of the sensitivity of metastatic colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair to standard-of-care chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies, with recommendations for future research.

In 5% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, tumours display a deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) system. Immunotherapy is beneficial in dMMR mCRC patients and has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients with unresectable or metastatic dMMR CRC. Although dMMR and proficient MMR (pMMR) CRC tumours are biologically distinct, they are commonly treated with the same chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies. This includes dMMR mCRC patients who did not respond to immunotherapy (20-30%). However, it is unclear if these treatments are equally beneficial in dMMR mCRC. Of note, dMMR mCRC patients have a worse prognosis compared to pMMR, which may in part be caused by a lower response to treatment. To avoid unnecessary exposure to ineffective treatments and their associated toxicity, it is important to identify which systemic treatments are most beneficial in dMMR mCRC patients, thus improving their outcome. Indeed, future treatment strategies are likely to involve combinations of immunotherapy, chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies. In this evidence-based review, we summarize clinical trials reporting treatment efficacy of different types of chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies in dMMR mCRC patients. We also review the biological rationale behind a potential differential benefit of chemotherapy with or without monoclonal antibodies in dMMR mCRC patients. A barrier in the interpretation of preclinical results is the choice of model systems. They largely comprise traditional models, including cell lines and xenografts, rather than more representative models, such as patient-derived organoids. We provide concrete recommendations for clinical investigators and fundamental researchers to accelerate research regarding which systemic therapy is most effective in dMMR mCRC patients.

Estimating adjuvant treatment effects in Stage II colon cancer: Comparing the synthesis of randomized clinical trial data to real-world data.

There is an ongoing discussion regarding the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage II colon cancer. We therefore estimated adjuvant treatment effect in Stage II colon cancer using pooled disease-free survival (DFS) data from randomized clinical trials (RCT approach) and compared this to real-world data (RWD approach) estimates. First, we estimated the treatment effect in RCTs by (i) searching relevant trials reporting DFS data, (ii) generating patient-level data from reported DFS data and (iii) estimating treatment effect in the patient-level data. Second, the treatment effect was estimated in an observational cohort of 1,947 patients provided by the Netherlands Cancer Registry using three propensity score methods; matching, weighting and stratification. In the RCT approach, patient-level data of 4,489 patients (events: 853) were generated from seven trials which compared two of the following treatment arms: control, 5FU/LV or FOLFOX. A Cox model was used to estimate a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (0.43;1.10) for 5FU/LV vs. control and 0.93 (0.72;1.15) for FOLFOX vs. 5FU/LV. In the RWD approach, HRs for any adjuvant treatment vs. control were 0.95 (0.50;1.80), 0.88 (0.24;3.21) and 1.05 (0.04;2.06) using matching, weighting and stratification, respectively. There was no significant difference with the estimates from the RCT approach (interaction test, p > 0.10). The RCT data suggest a clinically relevant benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of DFS, but the estimate did not reach statistical significance. Stratified analyses are required to evaluate whether treatment effect differs in specific subgroups.