Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 74(6): 1057-1065.e4, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26946986

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies indicate adherence to biologics among patients with psoriasis is low, yet little is known about their use in the Medicare population. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate real-world utilization patterns in a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries with psoriasis initiating infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, or ustekinumab. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective claims analysis using 2009 through 2012 100% Medicare Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Part A, B, and D files, with 12-month follow-up after index prescription. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were used to examine rates of and factors associated with biologic adherence, discontinuation, switching, and restarting. RESULTS: We examined 2707 patients initiating adalimumab (40.0%), etanercept (37.9%), infliximab (11.7%), and ustekinumab (10.3%); during 12-month follow-up, 38% were adherent and 46% discontinued treatment, with 8% switching to another biologic and 9% later restarting biologic treatment. Being female and being ineligible for low-income subsidies were associated with increased odds of decreased adherence. Outcomes varied by index biologic. LIMITATIONS: Patient-reported reasons for nonadherence or gaps in treatment are unavailable in claims data. CONCLUSION: Medicare patients initiating biologics for psoriasis had low adherence and high discontinuation rates. Further investigation into reasons for inconsistent utilization, including exploration of patient and provider decision-making and barriers to more consistent treatment, is needed.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/administração & dosagem , Terapia Biológica/normas , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Produtos Biológicos/farmacologia , Terapia Biológica/tendências , Intervalos de Confiança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Avaliação das Necessidades , Razão de Chances , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
2.
J Invest Dermatol ; 135(12): 2955-2963, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26214380

RESUMO

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory disorder, primarily of the skin. Despite an aging population, knowledge of the epidemiology of psoriasis and its treatments among the elderly is limited. We examined the prevalence of psoriasis and its treatments, with a focus on biologics and identification of factors associated with biologic use, using a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries in 2011. On the basis of several psoriasis identification algorithms, the claims-based prevalence for psoriasis in the United States ranged from 0.51 to 1.23%. Treatments used for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (phototherapy, oral systemic, or biologic therapies) were received by 27.3% of the total psoriasis sample, of whom 37.2% used biologics. Patients without a Medicare Part D low-income subsidy (LIS) had 70% lower odds of having received biologics than those with LIS (odds ratio 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.46). Similarly, the odds of having received biologics were 69% lower among black patients compared with white patients (0.31; 0.16-0.60). This analysis identified potential financial and racial barriers to receipt of biologic therapies and underscores the need for additional studies to further define the epidemiology and treatment of psoriasis among the elderly.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Prevalência , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 46(5): 659-70, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22510666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to oral osteoporosis medications is common. Strategies for improving adherence begin with identification of the problem. The 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale for self-reported adherence to antihypertensive medications was modified for assessing adherence to oral osteoporosis medications. An evaluation of the measurement properties of the Osteoporosis-Specific Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (OS-MMAS) was needed. OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychometric properties of the OS-MMAS in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: Five hundred women aged 55 years and older with osteoporosis who were newly prescribed daily or weekly oral bisphosphonates between May 15, 2010, and August 15, 2010, were randomly selected from Kaiser Permanente Southern California, a large integrated health care delivery system, and mailed a self-administered survey that included the 8-item OS-MMAS, Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS), Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), and 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12v2). OS-MMAS scores can range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating better medication adherence. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach α coefficient. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) in a subset of 102 participants. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and correlations between OS-MMAS and related measures. RESULTS: Of 197 participants, 150 reported that they were still taking their bisphosphonate at the time of the survey and completed the OS-MMAS. Overall, 30.7%, 32.7%, and 36.7% had low, medium, and high OS-MMAS scores (<6, 6 to <8, and 8, respectively). Cronbach α was 0.82 and the ICC was 0.77. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations with SEAMS, BMQ necessity, and TSQM scores. In confirmatory factor analysis, a single-factor scale was supported. CONCLUSIONS: The OS-MMAS showed strong psychometric properties with good reliability and construct validity and may provide a valuable assessment of self-reported medication adherence in women newly prescribed oral osteoporosis medications.


Assuntos
Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/psicologia , Pós-Menopausa/psicologia , Psicometria/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , California , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Satisfação do Paciente , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Autoeficácia , Autorrelato
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA