gyrA Mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium and Their Contribution to Moxifloxacin Failure: Time for the Next Generation of Resistance-Guided Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Although single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Mycoplasma genitalium parC contribute to fluoroquinolone treatment failure, data are limited for the homologous gene, gyrA. This study investigated the prevalence of gyrA SNPs and their contribution to fluoroquinolone failure. METHODS: Samples from 411 patients (male and female) undergoing treatment for M. genitalium infection (Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, March 2019-February 2020) were analyzed by Sanger sequencing (gyrA and parC). For patients treated with moxifloxacin (n = 194), the association between SNPs and microbiologic treatment outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: The most common parC SNP was G248T/S83I (21.1% of samples), followed by D87N (2.3%). The most common gyrA SNP was G285A/M95I (7.1%). Dual parC/gyrA SNPs were found in 8.6% of cases. One third of infections harboring parC G248T/S83I SNP had a concurrent SNP in gyrA conferring M95I. SNPs in gyrA cooccurred with parC S83I variations. Treatment failure was higher in patients with parC S83I/gyrA dual SNPs when compared with infections with single S83I SNP alone from analysis of (1) 194 cases in this study (81.2% vs 45.8%, P = .047), and (2) pooled analysis of a larger population of 535 cases (80.6% vs 43.2%; P = .0027), indicating a strong additive effect. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with parC S83I SNP alone, M. genitalium infections with dual mutations affecting parC/gyrA had twice the likelihood of failing moxifloxacin. Although antimicrobial resistance varies by region globally, these data indicate that gyrA should be considered as a target for future resistance assays in Australasia. We propose a strategy for the next generation of resistance-guided therapy incorporating parC and gyrA testing.

Combination Therapy for Mycoplasma genitalium, and New Insights Into the Utility of parC Mutant Detection to Improve Cure.

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infection is challenging to cure because of rising antimicrobial resistance and limited treatment options. METHODS: This was a prospective evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of resistance-guided combination antimicrobial therapy for MG treatment at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (August 2019-December 2020). All patients received 7 days of doxycycline before combination therapy based on the macrolide-resistant profile. Macrolide-susceptible infections received combination doxycycline + azithromycin (1 g, day 1; 500 mg, days 2-4) and macrolide-resistant infections combination doxycycline + moxifloxacin (400 mg daily for 7 days). Adherence and adverse effects were recorded at test-of-cure, recommended 14-28 days after antimicrobial completion. Sequencing was performed to determine the prevalence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the parC gene and their association with moxifloxacin treatment outcomes in macrolide-resistant infections. RESULTS: Of 100 patients with macrolide-susceptible MG treated with doxycycline + azithromycin, 93 were cured (93.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 86.1-97.1). Of 247 patients with macrolide-resistant MG receiving doxycycline + moxifloxacin, 210 were cured (85.0%; 95% CI, 80.0-89.2). parC sequencing was available for 164 (66%) macrolide-resistant infections; 29% had SNPs at parC S83 or D87 (23% S83I). The absence of SNPs at parC S83/D87 was associated with 98.3% cure (95% CI, 93.9-99.8) following doxycycline + moxifloxacin. The presence of the parC S83I-SNP was associated with failure in 62.5% (95% CI, 45.8-77.3). Side effects were common (40%-46%) and predominantly mild and gastrointestinal. CONCLUSIONS: Combination doxycycline + azithromycin achieved high cure for macrolide-susceptible infections. However, in the context of a high prevalence of the parC S83I mutation (23%) in macrolide-resistant infections, doxycycline + moxifloxacin cured only 85%. Infections that were wild-type for S83/D87 experienced high cure following doxycycline + moxifloxacin, supporting the use of a parC-resistance/susceptibility testing strategy in clinical care.

Prevalence of mutations associated with resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma genitalium: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma genitalium is now recognised as an important bacterial sexually transmitted infection. We summarised data from studies of mutations associated with macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in M genitalium to establish the prevalence of resistance. We also investigated temporal trends in resistance and aimed to establish the association between resistance and geographical location. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE for studies that included data for the prevalence of mutations associated with macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in M genitalium published in any language up to Jan 7, 2019. We defined prevalence as the proportion of M genitalium samples positive for key mutations associated with azithromycin resistance (23S rRNA gene, position 2058 or 2059) or moxifloxacin resistance (S83R, S83I, D87N, or D87Y in parC), or both, among all M genitalium samples that were successfully characterised. We used random-effects meta-analyses to calculate summary estimates of prevalence. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses by WHO region and time period were done. This study was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42016050370. RESULTS: Overall, 59 studies from 21 countries met the inclusion criteria for our study: 57 studies of macrolide resistance (8966 samples), 25 of fluoroquinolone resistance (4003 samples), and 22 of dual resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones (3280 samples). The summary prevalence of mutations associated with macrolide resistance among M genitalium samples was 35·5% (95% CI 28·8-42·5); prevalence increased from 10·0% (95% CI 2·6-20·1%) before 2010, to 51·4% (40·3-62·4%) in 2016-17 (p<0·0001). Prevalence of mutations associated with macrolide resistance was significantly greater in samples in the WHO Western Pacific and Americas regions than in those from the WHO European region. The overall prevalence of mutations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in M genitalium samples was 7·7% (95% CI 4·5-11·4%). Prevalence did not change significantly over time, but was significantly higher in the Western Pacific region than in the European region. Overall, the prevalence of both mutations associated with macrolide resistance and those associated with fluoroquinolone resistance among M genitalium samples was 2·8% (1·3-4·7%). The prevalence of dual resistance did not change significantly over time, and did not vary significantly by geographical region. INTERPRETATION: Global surveillance and measures to optimise the efficacy of treatments-including resistance-guided strategies, new antimicrobials, and antimicrobial combination approaches-are urgently needed to ensure cure in a high proportion of M genitalium infections and to prevent further spread of resistant strains. FUNDING: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Resistance-Guided Antimicrobial Therapy Using Doxycycline-Moxifloxacin and Doxycycline-2.5 g Azithromycin for the Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium Infection: Efficacy and Tolerability.

BACKGROUND: Macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) exceeds 50% in many regions, and quinolone resistance is increasing. We recently reported that resistance-guided therapy (RGT) using doxycycline followed by sitafloxacin or 2.5 g azithromycin cured 92% and 95% of macrolide-resistant and macrolide-susceptible infections, respectively. We present data on RGT using doxycycline-moxifloxacin, the regimen recommended in international guidelines, and extend data on the efficacy of doxycycline-2.5 g azithromycin and de novo macrolide resistance. METHODS: Patients attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between 2017 and 2018 with sexually transmitted infection syndromes were treated with doxycycline for 7 days and recalled if MG-positive. Macrolide-susceptible cases received 2.5 g azithromycin (1 g, then 500 mg daily for 3 days), and resistant cases moxifloxacin (400 mg daily, 7 days). Test of cure was recommended 14-28 days post-antimicrobials. RESULTS: There were 383 patients (81 females/106 heterosexual males/196 men who have sex with men) included. Microbial cure following doxycycline-azithromycin was 95.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.7-98.0) and doxycycline-moxifloxacin was 92.0% (95% CI, 88.1-94.6). De novo macrolide resistance was detected in 4.6% of cases. Combining doxycycline-azithromycin data with our prior RGT study (n = 186) yielded a pooled cure of 95.7% (95% CI, 91.6-97.8). ParC mutations were present in 22% of macrolide-resistant cases. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the inclusion of moxifloxacin in resistance-guided strategies and extend the evidence for 2.5 g azithromycin and presumptive use of doxycycline. These data provide an evidence base for current UK, Australian, and European guidelines for the treatment of MG.

Macrolide resistance and azithromycin failure in a Mycoplasma genitalium-infected cohort and response of azithromycin failures to alternative antibiotic regimens.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the efficacy of 1 g azithromycin and alternative antibiotic regimens in a prospective cohort of Mycoplasma genitalium-infected participants, and factors associated with azithromycin failure. METHODS: Consecutive eligible M. genitalium-infected men and women attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between July 2012 and June 2013 were treated with 1 g of azithromycin and retested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on days 14 and 28. Cure was defined as PCR negative on day 28. Cases failing azithromycin were treated with moxifloxacin, and those failing moxifloxacin were treated with pristinamycin. Pre- and posttreatment samples were assessed for macrolide resistance mutations (MRMs) by high-resolution melt analysis. Mycoplasma genitalium samples from cases failing moxifloxacin were sequenced for fluoroquinolone resistance mutations. Multivariable analysis was used to examine associations with azithromycin failure. RESULTS: Of 155 participants treated with 1 g azithromycin, 95 (61% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 53%-69%]) were cured. Pretreatment MRM was detected in 56 (36% [95% CI, 28%-43%]) participants, and strongly associated with treatment failure (87% [95% CI, 76%-94%]; adjusted odds ratio, 47.0 [95% CI, 17.1-129.0]). All 11 participants who had MRM detected in posttreatment samples failed azithromycin. Moxifloxacin was effective in 53(88% [95% CI, 78%-94%]) of 60 cases failing azithromycin; all failures had gyrA and parC mutations detected in pretreatment samples. Six of 7 patients failing moxifloxacin treatment received pristinamycin, and all were PCR negative 28 days after pristinamycin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We report a high azithromycin failure rate (39%) in an M. genitalium-infected cohort in association with high levels of pretreatment macrolide resistance. Moxifloxacin failure occurred in 12% of patients who received moxifloxacin; all had pretreatment fluoroquinolone mutations detected. Pristinamycin was highly effective in treating macrolide- and quinolone-resistant strains.

A cohort study of Chlamydia trachomatis treatment failure in women: a study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis is the most commonly diagnosed bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the developed world and diagnosis rates have increased dramatically over the last decade. Repeat infections of chlamydia are very common and may represent re-infection from an untreated partner or treatment failure. The aim of this cohort study is to estimate the proportion of women infected with chlamydia who experience treatment failure after treatment with 1 gram azithromycin. METHODS/DESIGN: This cohort study will follow women diagnosed with chlamydia for up to 56 days post treatment. Women will provide weekly genital specimens for further assay. The primary outcome is the proportion of women who are classified as having treatment failure 28, 42 or 56 days after recruitment. Comprehensive sexual behavior data collection and the detection of Y chromosome DNA and high discriminatory chlamydial genotyping will be used to differentiate between chlamydia re-infection and treatment failure. Azithromycin levels in high-vaginal specimens will be measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method to assess whether poor azithromycin absorption could be a cause of treatment failure. Chlamydia culture and minimal inhibitory concentrations will be performed to further characterize the chlamydia infections. DISCUSSION: Distinguishing between treatment failure and re-infection is important in order to refine treatment recommendations and focus infection control mechanisms. If a large proportion of repeat chlamydia infections are due to antibiotic treatment failure, then international recommendations on chlamydia treatment may need to be re-evaluated. If most are re-infections, then strategies to expedite partner treatment are necessary.