Machine-Learning-Based Detecting of Eyelid Closure and Smiling Using Surface Electromyography of Auricular Muscles in Patients with Postparalytic Facial Synkinesis: A Feasibility Study.

Surface electromyography (EMG) allows reliable detection of muscle activity in all nine intrinsic and extrinsic ear muscles during facial muscle movements. The ear muscles are affected by synkinetic EMG activity in patients with postparalytic facial synkinesis (PFS). The aim of the present work was to establish a machine-learning-based algorithm to detect eyelid closure and smiling in patients with PFS by recording sEMG using surface electromyography of the auricular muscles. Sixteen patients (10 female, 6 male) with PFS were included. EMG acquisition of the anterior auricular muscle, superior auricular muscle, posterior auricular muscle, tragicus muscle, orbicularis oculi muscle, and orbicularis oris muscle was performed on both sides of the face during standardized eye closure and smiling tasks. Machine-learning EMG classification with a support vector machine allowed for the reliable detection of eye closure or smiling from the ear muscle recordings with clear distinction to other mimic expressions. These results show that the EMG of the auricular muscles in patients with PFS may contain enough information to detect facial expressions to trigger a future implant in a closed-loop system for electrostimulation to improve insufficient eye closure and smiling in patients with PFS.

Selective Electrical Surface Stimulation to Support Functional Recovery in the Early Phase After Unilateral Acute Facial Nerve or Vocal Fold Paralysis.

This article addresses the potential clinical value of surface electrical stimulation in the acute phase of denervation after the onset of facial nerve or recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. These two nerve lesions are the most frequent head and neck nerve lesions. In this review, we will work out several similarities concerning the pathophysiology features and the clinical scenario between both nerve lesions, which allow to develop some general rules for surface electrical stimulation applicable for both nerve lesions. The focus is on electrical stimulation in the phase between denervation and reinnervation of the target muscles. The aim of electrostimulation in this phase of denervation is to bridge the time until reinnervation is complete and to maintain facial or laryngeal function. In this phase, electrostimulation has to stimulate directly the denervated muscles, i.e. muscle stimulation and not nerve stimulation. There is preliminary data that early electrostimulation might also improve the functional outcome. Because there are still caveats against the use of electrostimulation, the neurophysiology of denervated facial and laryngeal muscles in comparison to innervated muscles is explained in detail. This is necessary to understand why the negative results published in several studies that used stimulation parameters are not suitable for denervated muscle fibers. Juxtaposed are studies using parameters adapted for the stimulation of denervated facial or laryngeal muscles. These studies used standardized outcome measure and show that an effective and tolerable electrostimulation of facial and laryngeal muscles without side effects in the early phase after onset of the lesions is feasible, does not hinder nerve regeneration and might even be able to improve the functional outcome. This has now to be proven in larger controlled trials. In our view, surface electrical stimulation has an unexploited potential to enrich the early therapy concepts for patients with unilateral facial or vocal fold paralysis.

Selective Surface Electrostimulation of the Denervated Zygomaticus Muscle.

This article describes a first attempt to generate a standardized and safe selective surface electrostimulation (SES) protocol, including detailed instructions on electrode placement and stimulation parameter choice to obtain a selective stimulation of the denervated zygomaticus muscle (ZYG), without unwanted simultaneous activation of other ipsilateral or contralateral facial muscles. METHODS: Single pulse stimulation with biphasic triangular and rectangular waveforms and pulse widths (PW) of 1000, 500, 250, 100, 50, 25, 15, 10, 5, 2, 1 ms, at increasing amplitudes between 0.1 and 20 mA was performed. Stimulations delivered in trains were assessed at a PW of 50 ms only. The stimulation was considered successful exclusively if it drew the ipsilateral corner of the mouth upwards and outwards, without the simultaneous activation of other ipsilateral or contralateral facial muscles. I/t curves, accommodation quotient, rheobase, and chronaxie were regularly assessed over 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: 5 facial paralysis patients were assessed. Selective ZYG response in absence of discomfort and unselective contraction of other facial muscle was reproducibly obtained for all the assessed patients. The most effective results with single pulses were observed with PW ≥ 50 ms. The required amplitude was remarkably lower (≤5 mA vs. up to 15 mA) in freshly diagnosed (≤3 months) than in long-term facial paralysis patients (>5 years). Triangular was more effective than rectangular waveform, mostly because of the lower discomfort threshold of the latter. Delivery of trains of stimulation showed similar results to the single pulse setting, though lower amplitudes were necessary to achieve the selective ZYG response. Initial reinnervation signs could be detected effectively by needle-electromyography (n-EMG). CONCLUSION: It is possible to define stimulation parameters able to elicit an effective selective stimulation of a specific facial muscle, in our case, of the ZYG, without causing discomfort to the patient and without causing unwanted unspecific reactions of other ipsilateral and/or contralateral facial muscles. We observed that the SES success is strongly conditioned by the correct electrode placement, which ideally should exclusively interest the area of the target muscles and its immediate proximity.

Laryngeal Electromyography.

Laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) is an important diagnostic and prognostic tool in neurolaryngology. This chapter presents the advances in LEMG in the last 5 years based on clinical trials. LEMG is in most cases an office-based procedure for decision making in neurolaryngology. When performed in a standardized way, LEMG helps to differentiate abnormal function of the vocal folds from nonorganic disorders. It is mainly used to confirm the diagnosis of vocal fold paralysis (VFP) and is less frequently used for the diagnosis of myopathies and motor neuron disorders. Also, the value of LEMG for other diseases than VFP is presented. First consensus recommendations for standard performance of LEMG have been published. This will facilitate the comparison of results from different researchers in the future. For many years, LEMG focused on the thyroarytenoid muscle. Data are presented showing that now more and more studies are performed including other laryngeal muscles, most importantly the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle and cricothyroid muscle. Diagnostics and estimating the prognosis for patients with VFP remains the most important issue for LEMG. First meta-analyses are now available analyzing which LEMG parameters are the best prognosticators for recovery or persistent palsy. Due to the advances in multichannel LEMG, laryngeal nerve monitoring can now control the recurrent laryngeal nerve and the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery. Finally, also the advances of LEMG for laryngeal pacing, guided laryngeal injections, laryngeal electrostimulation, and other indications beyond otolaryngology are discussed.

Can MRI quantify the volume changes of denervated facial muscles?

Could manual segmentation of magnetic resonance images be used to quantify the effects of transcutaneous electrostimulation and reinnervation of denervated facial muscle? Five patients with unilateral facial paralysis were scanned during the study while receiving a daily surface electrostimulation of the paralytic cheek region, but also after reinnervation. Their facial muscles were identified in 3D (coronal, sagittal, and axial) and segmented in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data for in total 28 time points over the 12 months of study. A non-significant trend of increasing muscle volume were detected after reinnervation. MRI is a valuable technique in the facial paralysis research.

Facial nerve electrodiagnostics for patients with facial palsy: a clinical practice guideline.

PURPOSE: Facial nerve electrodiagnostics is a well-established and important tool for decision making in patients with facial nerve diseases. Nevertheless, many otorhinolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons do not routinely use facial nerve electrodiagnostics. This may be due to a current lack of agreement on methodology, interpretation, validity, and clinical application. Electrophysiological analyses of the facial nerve and the mimic muscles can assist in diagnosis, assess the lesion severity, and aid in decision making. With acute facial palsy, it is a valuable tool for predicting recovery. METHODS: This paper presents a guideline prepared by members of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group and of the Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society for use in cases of peripheral facial nerve disorders based on a systematic literature search. RESULTS: Required equipment, practical implementation, and interpretation of the results of facial nerve electrodiagnostics are presented. CONCLUSION: The aim of this guideline is to inform all involved parties (i.e. otorhinolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons and other medical specialists, therapeutic professionals and the affected persons) and to provide practical recommendations for the diagnostic use of facial nerve electrodiagnostics.

Tolerability of facial electrostimulation in healthy adults and patients with facial synkinesis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate optimal stimulation parameters with regard to discomfort and tolerability for transcutaneous electrostimulation of facial muscles in healthy participants and patients with postparetic facial synkinesis. METHODS: Two prospective studies were performed. First, single pulse monophasic stimulation with rectangular pulses was compared to triangular pulses in 48 healthy controls. Second, 30 healthy controls were compared to 30 patients with postparetic facial synkinesis with rectangular pulse form. Motor twitch threshold, tolerability threshold, and discomfort were assessed using a numeric rating scale at both thresholds. RESULTS: Discomfort at motor threshold was significantly lower for rectangular than for triangular pulses. Average motor and tolerability thresholds were higher for patients than for healthy participants. Discomfort at motor threshold was significantly lower for healthy controls compared to patients. Major side effects were not seen. CONCLUSIONS: Surface electrostimulation for selective functional and tolerable facial muscle contractions in patients with postparetic facial synkinesis is feasible.

Surface electrical stimulation for facial paralysis is not harmful.

INTRODUCTION: Does electrical stimulation (ES) of denervated muscles delay or prevent reinnervation, or increase synkinesis? In this retrospective study we evaluate the outcome, with and without ES, of patients with acutely denervated facial muscles. METHODS: The effect of ES was analyzed in two experiments. In the first experiment, 39 patients (6 with home-based ES, median 17.5 months) underwent facial nerve reconstruction surgery. Time to recovery of volitional movements was analyzed. The second experiment involved 13 patients (7 with ES, median 19 months) during spontaneous reinnervation. Sunnybrook and eFACE scores provided functional outcome measures. RESULTS: No difference in time of reinnervation after facial nerve reconstruction surgery was seen between the patients with and without ES (median [interquartile range]: 4.5 [3.0-5.25] vs 5.7 [3.5-9.5] months; P = .2). After spontaneous reinnervation, less synkinesis was noted (Sunnybrook synkinesis score: 3.0 [2.0-3.0] vs 5.5 [4.75-7.0]; P = .02) with ES. DISCUSSION: We find no evidence that ES prevents or delays reinnervation or increases synkinesis in facial paralysis.

Altered facial muscle innervation pattern in patients with postparetic facial synkinesis.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Using surface electrostimulation, we aimed to use facial nerve mapping (FNM) in healthy subjects and patients with postparetic facial synkinesis (PPFS) to define functional facial target regions that can be stimulated selectively. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective cohort study. METHODS: FNM was performed bilaterally in 20 healthy subjects and 20 patients with PPFS. Single-pulse surface FNM started at the main trunk of the facial nerve and followed the peripheral branches in a distal direction. Stimulation started with 0.1 mA and increased in 0.1 mA increments. The procedure was simultaneously video recorded and evaluated offline. RESULTS: A total of 1,873 spots were stimulated, and 1,875 facial movements were evaluated. The stimulation threshold was higher on the PPFS side (average = 9.8 ± 1.0 mA) compared to the contralateral side (4.1 ± 0.8 mA) for all stimulation sites or compared to healthy subjects (4.1 ± 0.5 mA; all P < .01). In healthy subjects, selective electrostimulation ± one unintended coactivation was possible at all sites in >80% of cases, with the exception of pulling up the corner of the mouth (65%-75%). On the PPFS side, stimulation was possible for puckering lips movements in 60%/75% (selective stimulation ± one coactivation, respectively), blinking in 55%/80%, pulling up the corner of the mouth in 50%/85%, brow raising in 5%/85, and raising the chin in 0%/35% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FNM mapping for surgical planning and selective electrostimulation of functional facial regions is possible even in patients with PPFS. FNM may be a tool for patient-specific evaluation and placement of electrodes to stimulate the correct nerve branches in future bionic devices (e.g., for a bionic eye blink). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b Laryngoscope, 130:E320-E326, 2020.

Exploring intrinsic triggers for functional facial electrostimulation based on intramuscular electromyography recordings.

Based on univariate intramuscular electromyography (EMG) recordings of facial muscles of patients suffering from chronic idiopathic facial palsy we propose a data-driven feature selection process for the discrimination of different mimic maneuvers. Following fundamental ideas of automatic EMG decompositions based on templates defined by motor unit action potentials, the proposed approach relies on a multiple template matching. Yet, the novel methodology utilizes templates derived from the intramuscular EMG signal itself without any supervisor interaction or a priori information by identifying abundant short signal sections (motifs). Focusing on motifs as individual, characteristical graphoelements of an EMG recording implies a high level of flexibility. In connection with facial palsy such a flexibility is necessary, since unique individual, also pathological, EMG patterns can be expected due to the high spatial variability of intramuscular recordings combined with random patterns of aberrant reinnervation. The proposed methodology is applied to EMG data of frontalis, zygomaticus, and orbicularis oculi muscle without patient- or muscle-specific adaptations.

High variability of facial muscle innervation by facial nerve branches: A prospective electrostimulation study.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To examine by intraoperative electric stimulation which peripheral facial nerve (FN) branches are functionally connected to which facial muscle functions. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective clinical study. METHODS: Seven patients whose peripheral FN branching was exposed during parotidectomy under FN monitoring received a systematic electrostimulation of each branch starting with 0.1 mA and stepwise increase to 2 mA with a frequency of 3 Hz. The electrostimulation and the facial and neck movements were video recorded simultaneously and evaluated independently by two investigators. RESULTS: A uniform functional allocation of specific peripheral FN branches to a specific mimic movement was not possible. Stimulation of the whole spectrum of branches of the temporofacial division could lead to eye closure (orbicularis oculi muscle function). Stimulation of the spectrum of nerve branches of the cervicofacial division could lead to reactions in the midface (nasal and zygomatic muscles) as well as around the mouth (orbicularis oris and depressor anguli oris muscle function). Frontal and eye region were exclusively supplied by the temporofacial division. The region of the mouth and the neck was exclusively supplied by the cervicofacial division. Nose and zygomatic region were mainly supplied by the temporofacial division, but some patients had also nerve branches of the cervicofacial division functionally supplying the nasal and zygomatic region. CONCLUSIONS: FN branches distal to temporofacial and cervicofacial division are not necessarily covered by common facial nerve monitoring. Future bionic devices will need a patient-specific evaluation to stimulate the correct peripheral nerve branches to trigger distinct muscle functions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 127:1288-1295, 2017.

Laryngeal electromyography: a proposal for guidelines of the European Laryngological Society.

Although recognized as a valuable diagnostic tool for more than 60 years, many laryngologists do not routinely use laryngeal electromyography (LEMG). This may be due to a persisting lack of agreement on methodology, interpretation, validity, and clinical application of LEMG. To achieve consensus in these fields, a laryngeal electromyography working group of European neurolaryngologic experts was formed in order to (1) evaluate guidelines for LEMG performance and (2) identify issues requiring further clarification. To obtain an overview of existing knowledge and research, English-language literature about LEMG was identified using Medline. Additionally, cited works not detected in the initial search were screened. Evidence-based recommendations for the performance and interpretation of LEMG and also for electrostimulation for functional evaluation were considered, as well as published reports based on expert opinion and single-institution retrospective case series. To assess the data obtained by this literature evaluation, the working group met five times and performed LEMG together on more than 20 patients. Subsequently, the results were presented and discussed at the 8th Congress of the European Laryngological Society in Vienna, Austria, September 1-4, 2010, and consensus was achieved in the following areas: (1) minimum requirements for the technical equipment required to perform and record LEMG; (2) best practical implementation of LEMG; (3) criteria for interpreting LEMG. Based on this consensus, prospective trials are planned to improve the quality of evidence guiding the proceedings of practitioners.