Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Restor Neurol Neurosci ; 36(2): 161-171, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29526857

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preliminary evidence showed additional effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the damaged cerebral hemisphere combined with cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation during robot-assisted gait training in chronic stroke patients. This is consistent with the neural organization of locomotion involving cortical and spinal control. The cerebellum is crucial for locomotor control, in particular for avoidance of obstacles, and adaptation to novel conditions during walking. Despite its key role in gait control, to date the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the cerebellum have not been investigated on brain stroke patients treated with robot-assisted gait training. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation combined with transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic brain stroke. METHODS: After balanced randomization, 20 chronic stroke patients received ten, 20-minute robot-assisted gait training sessions (five days a week, for two consecutive weeks) combined with central nervous system stimulation. Group 1 underwent on-line cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the contralesional cerebellar hemisphere + cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation. Group 2 received on-line anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the damaged cerebral hemisphere + cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation. The primary outcome was the 6-minute walk test performed before, after, and at follow-up at 2 and 4 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: The significant differences in the 6-minute walk test noted between groups at the first post-treatment evaluation (p = 0.041) were not maintained at either the 2-week (P = 0.650) or the 4-week (P = 0.545) follow-up evaluations. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary findings support the hypothesis that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the contralesional cerebellar hemisphere in combination with cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation might be useful to boost the effects of robot-assisted gait training in chronic brain stroke patients with walking impairment.


Assuntos
Cerebelo/fisiologia , Robótica , Medula Espinal/fisiologia , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua/métodos , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Eletroencefalografia , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Feminino , Lateralidade Funcional , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Restor Neurol Neurosci ; 33(3): 357-68, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26410579

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Preliminary evidence has shown no additional effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on robotic gait training in chronic stroke, probably due to the neural organization of locomotion involving cortical and spinal control. Our aim was to compare the combined effects of tDCS and transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on robotic gait training in chronic stroke. METHODS: Thirty chronic stroke patients received ten 20-minute robot-assisted gait training sessions, five days a week, for 2 consecutive weeks combined with anodal tDCS + sham tsDCS (group 1; n = 10) or sham tDCS + cathodal tsDCS (group 2; n = 10) or tDCS + cathodal tsDCS (group 3; n = 10). The primary outcome was the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) performed before, after, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: Significant differences in the 6MWT distance were noted between group 3 and group 1 at the post-treatment and 2-week follow-up evaluations (post-treatment P = 0.015; 2-week follow-up P = 0.001) and between group 3 and group 2 (post-treatment P = 0.010; 2-week follow-up P =  .015). No difference was found between group 2 and group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings support the hypothesis that anodal tDCS combined with cathodal tsDCS may be useful to improve the effects of robotic gait training in chronic stroke.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Marcha/fisiologia , Robótica , Medula Espinal/fisiopatologia , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea , Caminhada/fisiologia , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair ; 25(9): 838-46, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21825004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No rehabilitation intervention has effectively improved functional use of the arm and hand in patients with severe upper limb paresis after stroke. Pilot studies suggest the potential for transcranial direct current stimulation and bilateral robotic training to enhance gains. OBJECTIVE: In a double-blind, randomized trial the combination of these interventions was tested. METHODS: This study randomized 96 patients with an ischemic supratentorial lesion of 3 to 8 weeks' duration with severe impairment of motor control with a Fugl-Meyer score (FMS) for the upper limb <18 into 3 groups. For 6 weeks, group A received anodal stimulation of the lesioned hemisphere, group B received cathodal stimulation of the nonlesioned side for 20 minutes at 2.0 mA, and group C received sham stimulation. The electrodes were placed over the hand area and above the contralateral orbit. Contemporaneously, the subjects practiced 400 repetitions each of 2 different bilateral movements on a robotic assistive device. RESULTS: The groups were matched at onset. The FMS improved in all patients at 6 weeks (P < .001). No between-group differences were found; initial versus finish FMS scores were 7.8 ± 3.8 versus 19.1 ± 14.4 in group A, 7.9 ± 3.4 versus 18.8 ± 10.5 in group B, and 8.2 ± 4.4 versus 19.2 ± 15.0 in group C. No significant changes between groups were present at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Neither anodal nor cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhanced the effect of bilateral arm training in this exploratory trial of patients with cortical involvement and severe weakness. Unilateral hand training and upregulation of the nonlesioned hemisphere might also be tried in this population.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Paresia/reabilitação , Robótica/métodos , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Terapia por Exercício/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paresia/etiologia , Paresia/fisiopatologia , Robótica/instrumentação , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana/instrumentação , Adulto Jovem
4.
Clin Rehabil ; 25(6): 537-48, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21402651

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether robot-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation is more effective than robot-assisted gait training alone or conventional walking rehabilitation for improving walking ability in stroke patients. DESIGN: Pilot randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation unit of a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Thirty patients with chronic stroke. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received ten 50-minute treatment sessions, five days a week, for two consecutive weeks. Group 1 (n = 10) underwent a robot-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation; group 2 (n = 10) underwent a robot-assisted gait training combined with sham transcranial direct current stimulation; group 3 (n = 10) performed overground walking exercises. MAIN MEASURES: Patients were evaluated before, immediately after and two weeks post treatment. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: six-minute walking test, 10-m walking test. RESULTS: No differences were found between groups 1 and 2 for all primary outcome measures at the after treatment and follow-up evaluations. A statistically significant improvement was found after treatment in performance on the six-minute walking test and the 10-m walking test in favour of group 1 (six-minute walking test: 205.20 ± 61.16 m; 10-m walking test: 16.20 ± 7.65 s) and group 2 (six-minute walking test: 182.5 ± 69.30 m; 10-m walking test: 17.71 ± 8.20 s) compared with group 3 (six-minute walking test: 116.30 ± 75.40 m; 10-m walking test: 26.30 ± 14.10 s). All improvements were maintained at the follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: In the present pilot study transcranial direct current stimulation had no additional effect on robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke. Larger studies are required to confirm these preliminary findings.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/reabilitação , Robótica/métodos , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Idoso , Feminino , Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/etiologia , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ambulatório Hospitalar , Projetos Piloto , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana/métodos , Caminhada/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA