Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 38(5): 1169-1177, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34463396

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Systemic medications and phototherapy are used to treat pediatric psoriasis, but real-world data on treatment utilization and persistence are limited. The study objective was to determine systemic and phototherapy treatment utilization and compare drug survival among systemics in pediatric psoriasis. METHODS: Using United States commercial insurance claims data, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted to describe the prevalence of systemic treatment and phototherapy use among patients <18 years old with psoriasis. We compared drug survival among new users of methotrexate, adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab using a retrospective cohort design. RESULTS: Among 13 759 patients, 14.6% used systemic or phototherapy treatment during 2001-2016, with rising utilization of systemics over this period. Among 579 new users of methotrexate, adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab, the median durations of the initial treatment course were 141 (IQR 59-314), 179 (79-339), 175 (90-419), and 216 (64-435) days, respectively (P = .04). Drug discontinuation was less likely among ustekinumab (HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.27-0.83]), etanercept (0.74 [0.59-0.92]), and adalimumab (0.75 [0.55-1.02]) initiators than methotrexate initiators after adjustment for sociodemographic factors and psoriatic arthritis. Drug survival differences were limited to systemic-naïve patients. Potential limitations include short follow-up and residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of systemic therapies for pediatric psoriasis is increasing, but differences in drug survival exist.


Assuntos
Preparações Farmacêuticas , Psoríase , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Etanercepte/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico
2.
Clin Dermatol ; 34(3): 344-52, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27265072

RESUMO

The treatment of rheumatic and autoimmune skin disease in women who are pregnant or of childbearing potential can present challenges to the dermatologist. We discuss the current approaches to treating lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, dermatomyositis, morphea and systemic sclerosis, mixed connective tissue disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and autoimmune blistering disease in such patients. In the appropriate setting, topical and systemic corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine, dapsone, azathioprine, and ultraviolet B phototherapy may be safely and cautiously used during pregnancy. Considerations about contraception, planned conception, therapeutic options, and disease control are paramount in optimizing pregnancy outcomes and minimizing risks to both mother and fetus.


Assuntos
Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Lactação , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Contraindicações , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Dermatomiosite/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Pênfigo/terapia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/radioterapia , Esclerodermia Localizada/terapia , Escleroderma Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatopatias/radioterapia , Terapia Ultravioleta
3.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 68(1): 64-72, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22846688

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread dissatisfaction and low treatment persistence in moderate to severe psoriasis, patients' reasons behind treatment discontinuation remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize patient-reported reasons for discontinuing commonly used treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 1095 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis from 10 dermatology practices who received systemic treatments completed a structured interview. Eleven reasons for treatment discontinuation were assessed for all past treatments. RESULTS: A total of 2231 past treatments were reported. Median treatment duration varied by treatment, ranging from 6.0 to 20.5 months (P < .001). The frequency of each cited discontinuation reasons differed by treatment (all P < .01). Patients who received etanercept (odds ratio [OR] 5.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.23-8.33) and adalimumab (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.20-3.67) were more likely to cite a loss of efficacy than those who received methotrexate. Patients who received etanercept (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.23-0.49), adalimumab (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.30-0.75), and ultraviolet B phototherapy (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.14-0.31) were less likely to cite side effects than those who received methotrexate, whereas those who received acitretin (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.08-2.25) were more likely to do so. Patients who underwent ultraviolet B phototherapy were more likely to cite an inability to afford treatment (OR 7.03; 95% CI 3.14-15.72). LIMITATIONS: The study is limited by its reliance on patient recall. CONCLUSIONS: Different patterns of treatment discontinuation reasons are important to consider when developing public policy and evidence-based treatment approaches to improve successful long-term psoriasis control.


Assuntos
Satisfação do Paciente , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/radioterapia , Acitretina/uso terapêutico , Adalimumab , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Etanercepte , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Ceratolíticos/uso terapêutico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia PUVA/efeitos adversos , Terapia PUVA/economia , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Arch Dermatol ; 148(4): 487-94, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22508874

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of biologic systemic therapy, nonbiologic systemic therapy, and phototherapy for treatment of psoriasis. DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was used. SETTING: Ten outpatient dermatology sites across the United States participating in the Dermatology Clinical Effectiveness Research Network contributed to the study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 713 patients with plaque psoriasis receiving systemic monotherapy (ie, methotrexate sodium, adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab) or narrowband UV-B phototherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of the study was clear or almost clear skin on the Physician Global Assessment scale. Secondary outcomes were score on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, affected body surface area, and score on the Dermatology Life Quality Index. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with clear or almost clear ratings on the Physician Global Assessment scale differed among treatments: methotrexate (23.8%), adalimumab (47.7%), etanercept (34.2%), ustekinumab (36.1%), and narrowband UV-B (27.6%) (P < .001). In adjusted analyses, patients receiving adalimumab (relative response rate, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.60-2.90), etanercept (1.45; 1.06-1.97), and ustekinumab (1.57; 1.06-2.32) were more likely to have clear or almost clear skin vs patients receiving methotrexate. Patients receiving phototherapy showed no significant difference (1.35; 95% CI, 0.93-1.96) compared with those receiving methotrexate. No response difference was observed with respect to quality of life. Treatment doses were double the recommended doses in 36.1% of patients taking etanercept and 11.8% of those taking adalimumab;10.6% of patients undergoing phototherapy received the recommended treatment frequency. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of psoriasis therapies in clinical practice may be lower than that reported in previous trials. Although relative differences in objective response rates among therapies may exist, absolute differences are small and may not be clinically significant. Dosing of common therapies varied from trial recommendations. These results provide novel benchmarks emphasizing the critical importance of studying effectiveness in real-world practice.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/terapia , Terapia Ultravioleta , Adalimumab , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Estudos Transversais , Etanercepte , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Ustekinumab
5.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 66(3): 376-86, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21856040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, dermatologists' treatment preferences are unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess dermatologists' preferences for first-line treatments and their selection determinants. METHODS: We surveyed 1000 US dermatologists (500 National Psoriasis Foundation and 500 American Academy of Dermatology members who treat psoriasis) about their preferences for first-line treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in healthy adults of childbearing age using standardized patient vignettes. RESULTS: The response rate was 39% (N = 387). Preferred therapies for male and female patients were: ultraviolet (UV) B (40% and 56%, respectively), etanercept (15% and 19%), methotrexate (16% and 4%), and adalimumab (12% and 10%). Of respondents, 66% administered phototherapy in their practice. After adjusting for all physician characteristics, those preferring first-line UVB for male or female patients were significantly more likely to have phototherapy in their practice (odds ratio [OR] 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-6.6 and OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.3, respectively) and to have used UVB in more than 10 patients in the last 3 months (OR 8.0, 95% CI 3.9-16.4; OR 9.6, 95% CI 4.3-21.6). Dermatologists in the Midwest were more likely than those in the Northeast to prefer adalimumab first line for male and female patients. LIMITATIONS: We surveyed only dermatologists with interest in treating psoriasis and elicited their treatment preferences for a single base case scenario. Treatment preferences may differ between survey respondents and nonrespondents. CONCLUSION: UVB is most commonly preferred as a first-line treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis in healthy adults, and preferences vary based on region, phototherapy availability, and prior treatment use.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Dermatologia/métodos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Ultravioleta , Adalimumab , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Etanercepte , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Prática Profissional , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA