Neural Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities for Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and complications. The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a central role in AF, with the heart regulated by both extrinsic and intrinsic properties. In the extrinsic ANS, the sympathetic fibers are derived from the major paravertebral ganglia, especially the stellate ganglion (SG), which is a source of cardiac sympathetic innervation since it connects with multiple intrathoracic nerves and structures. The major intrinsic ANS is a network of axons and ganglionated plexi that contains a variety of sympathetic and parasympathetic neurons, which communicate with the extrinsic ANS. Simultaneous sympathovagal activation contributes to the development of AF because it increases calcium entry and shortens the atrial action potential duration. In animal and human studies, neuromodulation methods such as electrical stimulation and renal denervation have indicated potential benefits in controlling AF in patients as they cause SG remodeling and reduce sympathetic outflow. This review focuses on the neural mechanisms relevant to AF and the recent developments of neuromodulation methods for AF control.

Subcutaneous nerve stimulation for rate control in ambulatory dogs with persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous nerve stimulation (ScNS) damages the stellate ganglion and improves rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF) in ambulatory dogs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that thoracic ScNS can improve rate control in persistent AF. METHODS: We created persistent AF in 13 dogs and randomly assigned them to ScNS (n = 6) and sham control (n = 7) groups. 18F-2-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging of the brain stem was performed at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: The average stellate ganglion nerve activity reduced from 4.00 ± 1.68 µV after the induction of persistent AF to 1.72 ± 0.42 µV (P = .032) after ScNS. In contrast, the average stellate ganglion nerve activity increased from 3.01 ± 1.26 µV during AF to 5.52 ± 2.69 µV after sham stimulation (P = .023). The mean ventricular rate during persistent AF reduced from 149 ± 36 to 84 ± 16 beats/min (P = .011) in the ScNS group, but no changes were observed in the sham control group. The left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged in the ScNS group but reduced significantly in the sham control group. Immunostaining showed damaged ganglion cells in bilateral stellate ganglia and increased brain stem glial cell reaction in the ScNS group but not in the control group. The 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose uptake in the pons and medulla was significantly (P = .011) higher in the ScNS group than the sham control group at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Thoracic ScNS causes neural remodeling in the brain stem and stellate ganglia, controls the ventricular rate, and preserves the left ventricular ejection fraction in ambulatory dogs with persistent AF.

Antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic effects of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in ambulatory dogs.

BACKGROUND: High output subcutaneous nerve stimulation (ScNS) remodels the stellate ganglia and suppresses cardiac arrhythmia. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that long duration low output ScNS causes cardiac nerve sprouting and increases plasma norepinephrine concentration and the duration of paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (PAT) in ambulatory dogs. METHODS: We prospectively randomized 22 dogs (11 males and 11 females) into 5 different output groups for 2 months of ScNS: 0 mA (sham) (n = 6), 0.25 mA (n = 4), 1.5 mA (n = 4), 2.5 mA (n = 4), and 3.5 mA (n = 4). RESULTS: As compared with baseline, the changes in the durations of PAT episodes per 48 hours were significantly different among different groups (sham, -5.0 ± 9.5 seconds; 0.25 mA, 95.5 ± 71.0 seconds; 1.5 mA, -99.3 ± 39.6 seconds; 2.5 mA, -155.3 ± 87.8 seconds; and 3.5 mA, -76.3 ± 44.8 seconds; P < .001). The 3.5 mA group had a greater reduction in sinus heart rate than did the sham group (-29.8 ± 15.0 beats/min vs -14.5 ± 3.0 beats/min; P = .038). Immunohistochemical studies showed that the 0.25 mA group had a significantly increased while 2.5 mA and 3.5 mA stimulation had significantly reduced growth-associated protein 43 nerve densities in both atria and ventricles. The plasma norepinephrine concentrations in the 0.25 mA group was 5063.0 ± 4366.0 pg/mL, which was significantly higher than that in the other groups of dogs (739.3 ± 946.3; P = .009). There were no significant differences in the effects of simulation between males and females. CONCLUSION: In ambulatory dogs, low output ScNS causes cardiac nerve sprouting and increases plasma norepinephrine concentration and the duration of PAT episodes while high output ScNS is antiarrhythmic.