Candidatus Accumulibacter use fermentation products for enhanced biological phosphorus removal.

Previous research suggested that two major groups of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs), i.e., Ca. Accumulibacter and Tetrasphaera, play cooperative roles in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR). The fermentation of complex organic compounds by Tetrasphaera provides carbon sources for Ca. Accumulibacter. However, the viability of the fermentation products (e.g., lactate, succinate, alanine) as carbon sources for Ca. Accumulibacter and their potential effects on the metabolism of Ca. Accumulibacter were largely unknown. This work for the first time investigated the capability and metabolic details of Ca. Accumulibacter cognatus clade IIC strain SCUT-2 (enriched in a lab-scale reactor with a relative abundance of 42.8%) in using these fermentation products for EBPR. The enrichment culture was able to assimilate lactate and succinate with the anaerobic P release to carbon uptake ratios of 0.28 and 0.36 P mol/C mol, respectively. In the co-presence of acetate, the uptake of lactate was strongly inhibited, since two substrates shared the same transporter as suggested by the carbon uptake bioenergetic analysis. When acetate and succinate were fed at the same time, Ca. Accumulibacter assimilated two carbon sources simultaneously. Proton motive force (PMF) was the key driving force (up to 90%) for the uptake of lactate and succinate by Ca. Accumulibacter. Apart from the efflux of proton in symport with phosphate via the inorganic phosphate transport system, translocation of proton via the activity of fumarate reductase contributed to the generation of PMF, which agreed with the fact that PHV was a major component of PHA when lactate and succinate were used as carbon sources, involving the succinate-propionate pathway. Metabolic models for the usage of lactate and succinate by Ca. Accumulibacter for EBPR were built based on the combined physiological, biochemical, metagenomic, and metatranscriptomic analyses. Alanine was shown as an invalid carbon source for Ca. Accumulibacter. Instead, it significantly and adversely affected Ca. Accumulibacter-mediated EBPR. Phosphate release was observed without alanine uptake. Significant inhibitions on the aerobic phosphate uptake was also evident. Overall, this study suggested that there might not be a simply synergic relationship between Ca. Accumulibacter and Tetrasphaera. Their interactions would largely be determined by the kind of fermentation products released by the latter.

Carbon uptake bioenergetics of PAOs and GAOs in full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal systems.

This work analyzed, for the first time, the bioenergetics of PAOs and GAOs in full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for the uptake of different carbon sources. Fifteen samples were collected from five full-scale WWTPs. Predominance of different PAOs, i.e., Ca. Accumulibacter (0.00-0.49%), Tetrasphaera (0.37-3.94%), Microlunatus phosphovorus (0.01-0.18%), etc., and GAOs, i.e., Ca. Competibacter (0.08-5.39%), Defluviicoccus (0.05-5.34%), Micropruina (0.17-1.87%), etc., were shown by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Despite the distinct PAO/GAO community compositions in different samples, proton motive force (PMF) was found as the key driving force (up to 90.1%) for the uptake of volatile fatty acids (VFAs, acetate and propionate) and amino acids (glutamate and aspartate) by both GAOs and PAOs at the community level, contrasting the previous understanding that Defluviicoccus have a low demand of PMF for acetate uptake. For the uptake of acetate or propionate, PAOs rarely activated F1, F0- ATPase (< 11.7%) or fumarate reductase (< 5.3%) for PMF generation; whereas, intensive involvements of these two pathways (up to 49.2% and 61.0%, respectively) were observed for GAOs, highlighting a major and community-level difference in their VFA uptake biogenetics in full-scale systems. However, different from VFAs, the uptake of glutamate and aspartate by both PAOs and GAOs commonly involved fumarate reductase and F1, F0-ATPase activities. Apart from these major and community-level differences, high level fine-scale micro-diversity in carbon uptake bioenergetics was observed within PAO and GAO lineages, probably resulting from their versatilities in employing different pathways for reducing power generation. Ca. Accumulibacter and Halomonas seemed to show higher dependency on the reverse operation of F1, F0-ATPase than other PAOs, likely due to the low involvement of glyoxylate shunt pathway. Unlike Tetrasphaera, but similar to Ca. Accumulibacter, Microlunatus phosphovorus took up glutamate and aspartate via the proton/glutamate-aspartate symporter driven by PMF. This feature was testified using a pure culture of Microlunatus phosphovorus stain NM-1. The major difference between PAOs and GAOs highlights the potential to selectively suppress GAOs for community regulation in EBPR systems. The finer-scale carbon uptake bioenergetics of PAOs or GAOs from different lineages benefits in understanding their interactions in community assembly in complex environment.