The prediction values of carbapenemase detection methods and carbapenem susceptibility testing for clinical outcomes of patients with Acinetobacter bacteremia under carbapenem treatment.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter species have emerged as notorious pathogens causing nosocomial infections. Several phenotypic methods have been developed for detecting carbapenemase production in Enterobacteriaceae. The accuracy of these methods in the prediction of carbapenemase production in Acinetobacter species has not been studied well. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled adult patients with Acinetobacter bacteremia from four medical centers in Taiwan between 2012 and 2016. Their demographics and clinical outcomes were recorded. The carbapenem susceptibility of the Acinetobacter species was determined using the agar diffusion method. The carbapenemase genes were detected by PCR. Four phenotypic methods, including the modified Hodge test (MHT), modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), Carba NP test, and CarbAcineto NP test were carried out to determine the production of carbapenemase. RESULTS: We analyzed 257 adults who received initial carbapenem monotherapy for the treatment of Acinetobacter bacteremia. Shock within three days of bacteremia and acquisition of carbapenem non-susceptible isolates were independently associated with a higher 14-day and 30-day mortality in patients with Acinetobacter bacteremia. Among the four phenotypic tests for carbapenemase detection, MHT using the imipenem disc displayed the greatest sensitivity (94%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 89-97%) and specificity (81%; 95% CI, 73-88%) for predicting imipenem non-susceptibility. CONCLUSION: Carbapenem non-susceptibility and shock were independent risk factors for mortality in patients with Acinetobacter bacteremia. The MHT could predict the carbapenem susceptibility of Acinetobacter isolates. It is a cheap and quick assay, which could be applied in clinical practice.

Multicentre study of risk factors for mortality in patients with Acinetobacter bacteraemia receiving colistin treatment.

Colistin remains a last-line antibiotic for the treatment of infections by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter species. However, mortality rates are high in patients with Acinetobacter infection receiving colistin treatment. This multicentre study evaluated whether colistin susceptibility, additional antimicrobial agents or other prognostic factors influenced the clinical outcomes of patients receiving colistin treatment for Acinetobacter bacteraemia. This retrospective study enrolled 122 adults receiving colistin for monomicrobial Acinetobacter bacteraemia at six medical centres in the ACTION Study Group over an 8-year period. Clinical information, antimicrobial susceptibility and colistin resistance determinants were analysed. The primary outcome measure was 14-day mortality. Among 122 patients, 18 and 104 were infected with colistin-resistant (ColR) isolates [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥4 mg/L] and colistin-susceptible (ColS) isolates (MIC ≤2 mg/L), respectively. Patients infected with ColR and ColS isolates did not differ significantly with regard to Charlson comorbidity index, invasive procedures, sources of bacteraemia, disease severity and 14-day mortality rate (44.4% vs. 34.6%; P = 0.592). No specific additional antimicrobial agent was independently associated with higher or lower mortality. Coronary artery disease, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and bacteraemia caused Acinetobacter baumannii were independent risk factors associated with 14-day mortality. Mechanisms of colistin resistance were associated with amino acid variants in the pmrCAB operon. Finally, previously unreported Acinetobacter nosocomialis amino acid variants related to colistin resistance were identified. In conclusion, colistin susceptibility and colistin combination antimicrobial treatment were not associated with decreased 14-day mortality in patients with Acinetobacter bacteraemia receiving colistin treatment.

Multicenter Study of Clinical Features of Breakthrough Acinetobacter Bacteremia during Carbapenem Therapy.

Breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia during carbapenem therapy is not uncommon, and it creates therapeutic dilemmas for clinicians. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and microbiological characteristics of breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia during carbapenem therapy and to assess the efficacy of various antimicrobial therapies. We analyzed 100 adults who developed breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia during carbapenem therapy at 4 medical centers over a 6-year period. Their 30-day mortality rate was 57.0%, and the carbapenem resistance rate of their isolates was 87.0%. Among patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter bacteremia, breakthrough bacteremia during carbapenem therapy was associated with a significantly higher 14-day mortality (51.7% versus 37.4%, respectively; P = 0.025 by bivariate analysis) and a higher 30-day mortality (P = 0.037 by log rank test of survival analysis) than in the nonbreakthrough group. For the treatment of breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia during carbapenem therapy, tigecycline-based therapy was associated with a significantly higher 30-day mortality (80.0%) than those with continued carbapenem therapy (52.5%) and colistin-based therapy (57.9%) by survival analysis (P = 0.047 and 0.045 by log rank test, respectively). Cox regression controlling for confounders, including severity of illness indices, demonstrated that treatment with tigecycline-based therapy for breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 3.659; 95% confidence interval, 1.794 to 7.465; P < 0.001). Patients with breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia during carbapenem therapy posed a high mortality rate. Tigecycline should be used cautiously for the treatment of breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia that develops during carbapenem therapy.

Multicenter Study of the Relationship between Carbapenem MIC Values and Clinical Outcome of Patients with Acinetobacter Bacteremia.

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) offer different recommendations for carbapenem MIC susceptibility breakpoints for Acinetobacter species. In addition, the clinical efficacy of the intermediate category remains uncertain. This study was designed to determine the optimal predictive breakpoints based on the survival of patients with Acinetobacter bacteremia treated with a carbapenem. We analyzed the 30-day mortality rates of 224 adults who received initial carbapenem monotherapy for the treatment of Acinetobacter bacteremia at 4 medical centers over a 5-year period, according to the carbapenem MICs of the initial isolates. The 30-day mortality was about 2-fold greater in patients whose isolates had carbapenem MICs of ≥8 mg/liter than in those with isolates with MICs of ≤4 mg/liter. The differences were significant by bivariate analysis (53.1% [60/113] versus 25.2% [28/111], respectively; P < 0.001) and on survival analysis by the log rank test (P < 0.001). Classification and regression tree analysis revealed a split between MICs of 4 and 8 mg/liter and predicted the same difference in mortality, with a P value of <0.001. Carbapenem treatment for Acinetobacter bacteremia caused by isolates with carbapenem MICs of ≥8 mg/liter was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 4.218; 95% confidence interval, 2.213 to 8.039; P < 0.001). This study revealed that patients with Acinetobacter bacteremia treated with a carbapenem had a more favorable outcome when the carbapenem MICs of their isolates were ≤4 mg/liter than those with MICs of ≥8 mg/liter.