Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 65(3): 211-7, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19959651

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have found significant race/ethnic and age differences in receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy for stages III colon and II/III rectal cancers. Little is known about the role of neighbourhood factors in these disparities. METHODS: The 4748 Black and White patients from the Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Registry were diagnosed with stages III colon and II/III rectal cancers between 2000 and 2004. Neighbourhood poverty, segregation (% Black residents) and rurality were linked to each patient using census tract identifiers. Multilevel analyses explored the role of neighbourhood characteristics and the nested association of patient race within categories of neighbourhoods in receipt of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Odds of receiving chemotherapy for urban and suburban patients were 38% (95% CI 1.09 to 1.74) and 53% (95% CI 1.20 to 1.94) higher than for rural patients. However, odds of receiving chemotherapy for urban Black patients were 24% (95% CI 0.62 to 0.94) lower than for their White counterparts. Receipt of chemotherapy did not significantly differ between Blacks and Whites residing in suburban or rural areas. CONCLUSION: Black-White disparities in receipt of chemotherapy among Georgia colorectal cancer patients were confined to urban patients. Disparities in receipt of this treatment for rural patients were found irrespective of patient race. Our findings highlight geographic areas where targeted interventions might be needed.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/etnologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Pobreza/etnologia , Características de Residência , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Georgia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multinível , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Preconceito , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Suburbana/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Occup Environ Med ; 61(1): 57-64, 2004 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14691274

RESUMO

AIMS: To evaluate the mortality experience of 1484 men employed in seven uranium mills in the Colorado Plateau for at least one year on or after 1 January 1940. METHODS: Vital status was updated through 1998, and life table analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Mortality from all causes and all cancers was less than expected based on US mortality rates. A statistically significant increase in non-malignant respiratory disease mortality and non-significant increases in mortality from lymphatic and haematopoietic malignancies other than leukaemia, lung cancer, and chronic renal disease were observed. The excess in lymphatic and haematopoietic cancer mortality was due to an increase in mortality from lymphosarcoma and reticulosarcoma and Hodgkin's disease. Within the category of non-malignant respiratory disease, mortality from emphysema and pneumoconioses and other respiratory disease was increased. Mortality from lung cancer and emphysema was higher among workers hired prior to 1955 when exposures to uranium, silica, and vanadium were presumably higher. Mortality from these causes of death did not increase with employment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Although the observed excesses were consistent with our a priori hypotheses, positive trends with employment duration were not observed. Limitations included the small cohort size and limited power to detect a moderately increased risk for some outcomes of interest, the inability to estimate individual exposures, and the lack of smoking data. Because of these limitations, firm conclusions about the relation of the observed excesses in mortality and mill exposures are not possible.


Assuntos
Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Mineração/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/mortalidade , Urânio/toxicidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causas de Morte , Estudos de Coortes , Colorado/epidemiologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tábuas de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/etiologia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/mortalidade
4.
Cancer Causes Control ; 8(3): 356-70, 1997 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9498899

RESUMO

Epidemiologic evidence on the relationship between selected industries and cancer is reviewed. This article will focus on several industries which have not been covered elsewhere in this volume, briefly describe current research on cancer in the agricultural and construction industries, and discuss surveillance data on cancer mortality in relation to industry listed on US death certificates. Employment in the rubber industry has been associated with bladder cancer, leukemia, stomach, and lung cancer and is considered by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to have 'sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans.' Studies of workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have reported excess mortality from gastrointestinal neoplasms, hematologic neoplasms, and skin cancer (specifically malignant melanoma); IARC considers that the evidence for carcinogenicity in humans is 'limited.' Employment in the boot and shoe industry has been associated with nasal adenocarcinomas in England and Italy ('sufficient'). Hairdressers and barbers have been found to have excess bladder cancer and less consistent evidence for several other sites ('limited'). Workers exposed to wood dust have excess mortality from cancer of the nasal sinuses and paranasal cavities; there is less consistent evidence for excess laryngeal cancer ('sufficient'). Workers employed in the petroleum industry have limited evidence for excess leukemia and other lymphatic and hematopoietic neoplasms, and skin cancer (particularly malignant melanoma) ('limited').


Assuntos
Carcinógenos/efeitos adversos , Indústrias , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Agricultura , Indústria da Beleza , Materiais de Construção , Atestado de Óbito , Poeira/efeitos adversos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/epidemiologia , Leucemia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Linfoma/epidemiologia , Masculino , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/mortalidade , Neoplasias dos Seios Paranasais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias dos Seios Paranasais/mortalidade , Petróleo , Bifenilos Policlorados/efeitos adversos , Vigilância da População , Borracha/efeitos adversos , Sapatos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Madeira
5.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 167(1): 39-43, 1996 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8659417

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to assess the prevalence of colonic lesions detected at barium enema in a community practice, to compare the findings at barium enema between patients who are asymptomatic and have no known risk factors for colorectal cancer (screening group) and patients who have symptoms of colonic disease or have known risk factors, and to determine if a questionnaire about symptoms and risk factors is an appropriate screening tool. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire about colorectal symptoms and risk factors was given to 1779 patients scheduled for barium enema examination. On the basis of their responses, patients were divided into three groups: screening group (asymptomatic, without risk factors), symptomatic, and asymptomatic with risk factors. Each patient underwent a fluoroscopic barium enema. We then compared the results (number, histologic type, size of lesion(s), location in the colon, and Patient's age) and risk factors among the three groups. RESULTS: At least one lesion within the colorectum was found in 166 (9%) of 1779 patients at combined proctosigmoidoscopy and barium enema. The prevalence of lesions in the 111 patients with at least one lesion above the rectum at barium enema was 4% (32 of 738) for the screening group, 8% (38 of 476) for asymptomatic patients with risk factors, and 7% (41 of 565) for symptomatic patients (p = .015 when comparing the prevalence in the screening group with the prevalences in the other two groups). Twenty-nine percent of all colonic lesions were found in the screening group. Among the asymptomatic patients, risk factors that included a history of colorectal polyps and advanced age were associated with a significantly higher prevalence of colonic polyps found at barium enema. In the symptomatic group, if patients with histories of polyps were excluded, we were unable to identify other risk factors that led to a significantly higher prevalence of polyps. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic patients without known risk factors have a significantly lower prevalence of colonic polyps than either symptomatic patients or patients with risk factors alone. Despite this lower prevalence, 29% of all lesions in our series were in the screening group. Assessment of risk factors through a patient questionnaire was not helpful in identifying a group of patients with a higher prevalence of lesions--except for a history of polyps. Management decisions based on a patient questionnaire should be approached with caution. When low-risk patients are denied screening examinations, a significant number of lesions will be missed.


Assuntos
Sulfato de Bário , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico por imagem , Enema , Idoso , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA