Immunosuppressant quantification in intravenous microdialysate - towards novel quasi-continuous therapeutic drug monitoring in transplanted patients.

OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays a crucial role in personalized medicine. It helps clinicians to tailor drug dosage for optimized therapy through understanding the underlying complex pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Conventional, non-continuous TDM fails to provide real-time information, which is particularly important for the initial phase of immunosuppressant therapy, e.g., with cyclosporine (CsA) and mycophenolic acid (MPA). METHODS: We analyzed the time course over 8 h of total and free of immunosuppressive drug (CsA and MPA) concentrations measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in 16 kidney transplant patients. Besides repeated blood sampling, intravenous microdialysis was used for continuous sampling. Free drug concentrations were determined from ultracentrifuged EDTA-plasma (UC) and compared with the drug concentrations in the respective microdialysate (µD). µDs were additionally analyzed for free CsA using a novel immunosensor chip integrated into a fluorescence detection platform. The potential of microdialysis coupled with an optical immunosensor for the TDM of immunosuppressants was assessed. RESULTS: Using LC-MS/MS, the free concentrations of CsA (fCsA) and MPA (fMPA) were detectable and the time courses of total and free CsA comparable. fCsA and fMPA and area-under-the-curves (AUCs) in µDs correlated well with those determined in UCs (r≥0.79 and r≥0.88, respectively). Moreover, fCsA in µDs measured with the immunosensor correlated clearly with those determined by LC-MS/MS (r=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The new microdialysis-supported immunosensor allows real-time analysis of immunosuppressants and tailor-made dosing according to the AUC concept. It readily lends itself to future applications as minimally invasive and continuous near-patient TDM.

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban do not affect AA- and ADP-induced platelet aggregation in patients receiving concomitant platelet inhibitors.

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are novel, vitamin K-independent oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and act via antagonism of the coagulation factor (F) IIa (dabigatran) or FXa (rivaroxaban), respectively. Compared to vitamin-K-antagonists, NOACs have shown non-inferiority of risk and benefit in patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). In clinical practice there is increasing use of NOACs combined with platelet inhibitors in patients with AF and coronary artery disease. However, whether NOACs affect the function of platelet inhibitors remains incompletely known. This observational study aimed to assess the platelet function in patients receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban and concomitant platelet inhibitors. A single centre observational study was performed analysing the platelet aggregation of patients treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban with or without concomitant platelet inhibitors. Measurements before the initiation of NOAC therapy served as the respective control group. Platelet aggregation was measured by multiple electrode aggregometry and was induced with adenosine diphosphate (ADP, 6.5 µM) and arachidonic acid (AA, 0.5 mM), respectively. In order to evaluate whether NOACs interact with platelet inhibition by ASA or the P2Y12-antagonist clopidogrel, 87 patients were grouped according to their concomitant antiplatelet medication. Comparing the ADP- and AA-induced platelet aggregation in patients without concomitant platelet inhibitors (n = 45) no significant differences under therapy with dabigatran (d) or rivaroxaban (r) compared to the control group (c) were observed. In patients taking clopidogrel as a concomitant platelet inhibitor (n = 21), neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban affected the ADP-induced platelet aggregation (c 20 ± 11, d 21 ± 14, r 18 ± 8 AU*min, p = 0.200). Patients receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban in combination with ASA (n = 42; 21 ASA only, 21 ASA + clopidogrel) showed no significant differences of the AA-induced aggregation compared to the control group (c 10 ± 8, d 9 ± 7, r 10 ± 8 AU*min, p = 0.810). The antiplatelet effects of ASA and clopidogrel monitored by AA- or ADP-induced platelet aggregation were not affected by NOAC therapy.

TRAP-induced platelet aggregation is enhanced in cardiovascular patients receiving dabigatran.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Novel (or non-vitamin K antagonist) oral anti-coagulants (NOACs) are antagonists of coagulation factors (F) Xa (rivaroxaban) or IIa (dabigatran), and their non-inferiority compared with vitamin K antagonists has been demonstrated in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. However, it is still not fully understood if and how dabigatran and rivaroxaban impact platelet function. This observational study aimed to assess platelet function in patients receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban. METHODS/RESULTS: This was a single centre, observational study quantifying platelet aggregation in 90 patients treated with NOACs by multiple electrode aggregometry. The thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP)-induced platelet aggregation was significantly higher in 35 patients receiving dabigatran (d) compared with control (c) patients (d 108±31 vs. c 85±30arbitrary units [AU]∗min, p<0.001). Patients receiving rivaroxaban (r) showed no differences compared with the control group (r 88±32 vs. c 85±30AU∗min, p=0.335). In intraindividual time courses of 16 patients, a significantly higher aggregation was found after the administration of dabigatran (before vs. after; 83±29 vs. 100±31AU∗min, p=0.009). CONCLUSION: In this observational study, the TRAP-induced platelet aggregation was enhanced in cardiovascular patients receiving dabigatran. This might be explained by a change in the expression profile of thrombin receptors on the surface of platelets. Rivaroxaban had no influence on platelet aggregation.