The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and relationship with fracture risk in older women presenting in Australian general practice.

AIM: To investigate vitamin D status among older women and to explore relationships between vitamin D and fracture risk and vertebral fractures. METHODS: A total of 267 general practitioners recruited 2466 women aged >70 years with no known osteoporosis or fragility fracture. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D), bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and vertebral fracture on thoracolumbar X-ray were determined. RESULTS: A total of 2368 women, median age 76 years, provided data and of these 13% were on vitamin D supplements. 25(OH)D levels were available for 907 (44.1%) of those not taking vitamin D. 88.3% of these had a level below 75 nmol/L. Serum 25(OH)D was negatively associated with age (P = 0.003) and body mass index (P < 0.001), and positively associated with lower latitude, femoral neck DXA T-score (P = 0.044) and being Caucasian (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The vitamin D status of community-dwelling older Australian women is inadequate, yet the use of supplements is low.

The glucose intolerance induced by caffeinated coffee ingestion is less pronounced than that due to alkaloid caffeine in men.

Although acute alkaloid caffeine (CAF) ingestion results in an impaired glucose tolerance, chronic coffee (RCOF) ingestion decreases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. This study examines the hypothesis that CAF ingestion impairs glucose tolerance to a greater extent than RCOF and that the ingestion of decaffeinated coffee (DECAF) results in a positive effect. Eleven healthy males underwent 4 double-blinded randomized trials. Each trial included the ingestion of either: 1) CAF in capsule form (4.45 mg/kg body weight), 2) RCOF (4.45 mg/kg body weight caffeine), 3) dextrose (placebo, PL) in capsule form, or 4) DECAF (equal in volume to the RCOF trial), followed 1-h later by a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test. Blood samples were collected at baseline (-30), 0 (time of treatment ingestion), 60 (initiation of oral glucose tolerance test), 75, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min. Area under the curve for glucose and insulin were higher (P < or = 0.05) following CAF than both PL and DECAF and, although a similar trend (P = 0.07) was observed following RCOF compared with DECAF, the effect was less pronounced. Interestingly, DECAF resulted in a 50% lower glucose response (P < or = 0.05) than PL, suggesting that the effects of PL and DECAF on glucose tolerance are not the same. These findings suggest that the effects of CAF and RCOF are not identical and may provide a partial explanation as to why acute CAF ingestion impairs glucose tolerance while chronic RCOF ingestion protects against type 2 diabetes.