The essential oil of Croton nepetaefolius selectively blocks histamine-augmented neuronal excitability in guinea-pig celiac ganglion.

OBJECTIVES: Croton nepetaefolius is a medicinal plant useful against intestinal disorders. In this study, we elucidate the effects of its essential oil (EOCN) on sympathetic neurons, with emphasis on the interaction of EOCN- and histamine-induced effects. METHODS: The effects of EOCN and histamine were studied in guinea-pig celiac ganglion in vitro. KEY FINDINGS: Histamine significantly altered the resting potential (E(m)) and the input resistance (R(i)) of phasic neurons (from -56.6 +/- 1.78 mV and 88.6 +/- 11.43 MOmega, to -52.9 +/- 1.96 mV and 108.6 +/- 11.00 MOmega, respectively). E(m), R(i) and the histamine-induced alterations of these parameters were not affected by 200 microg/ml EOCN. The number of action potentials produced by a 1-s (two-times threshold) depolarising current and the current threshold (I(th)) for eliciting action potentials (rheobase) were evaluated. Number of action potentials and I(th) were altered by histamine (from 2.6 +/- 0.43 action potentials and 105.4 +/- 11.15 pA to 6.2 +/- 1.16 action potentials and 67.3 +/- 8.21 pA, respectively). EOCN alone did not affect number of action potentials and I(th) but it fully blocked the histamine-induced modifications of number of action potentials and I(th). All the effects produced by histamine were abolished by pyrilamine. CONCLUSIONS: EOCN selectively blocked histamine-induced modulation of active membrane properties.

Excitation of primary afferent neurons by near-infrared light in vitro.

Near-infrared light therapy is an emerging neurostimulation technology, but its cellular mechanism of action remains unresolved. Using standard intracellular recording techniques, we observed that 5-10 ms pulses of 1889 nm light depolarized the membrane potential for hundreds of milliseconds in more than 85% of dorsal root ganglion and nodose ganglion neurons tested. The laser-evoked depolarizations (LEDs) exhibited complex, multiphasic kinetics comprising fast and slow components. There was no discernable difference in the LEDs in intact ganglion neurons and in acutely isolated neurons. Thus, the LED sensor seems to reside within the neuronal membrane. The near-uniform distribution of responsive neurons increased membrane conductance, and the negative reversal potential value (-41+/-2.9 mV) suggests that LED is unrelated to the activation of heat-sensitive transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 channels. The long duration of LEDs favors an involvement of second messengers.