RESUMO
Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous ï¬elds as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Estados Unidos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Estados Unidos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Atenção à Saúde , ConsensoRESUMO
Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cirurgiões , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , CoraçãoRESUMO
The objective of this study is to simulate regionalization of congenital heart surgery (CHS) in the United States and assess the impact of such a system on travel distance and mortality. Patients ≤18 years of age who underwent CHS were identified in 2012 State Inpatient Databases. Operations were stratified by the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery, version 1 (RACHS-1) method, with high risk defined as RACHS-1 levels 4-6. Regionalization was simulated by progressive closure of hospitals, beginning with the lowest volume hospital. Patients were moved to the next closest hospital. Analyses were conducted (1) maintaining original hospital mortality rates and (2) estimating mortality rates based on predicted surgical volumes after absorbing moved patients. One hundred fifty-three hospitals from 36 states performed 1 or more operation (19,064 operations). With regionalization wherein, all hospitals performed >310 operations, 37 hospitals remained, from 12.5% to 17.4% fewer deaths occurred (83-116/666), and median patient travel distance increased from 38.5 to 69.6 miles (P < 0.01). When only high-risk operations were regionalized, 3.9-5.9% fewer deaths occurred (26-39/666), and the overall mortality rate did not change significantly. Regionalization of CHS in the United States to higher volume centers may reduce mortality with minimal increase in patient travel distance. Much of the mortality reduction may be missed if solely high-risk patients are regionalized.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/organização & administração , Serviços Centralizados no Hospital/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Regionalização da Saúde/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Área Programática de Saúde , Bases de Dados Factuais , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico por imagem , Cardiopatias Congênitas/mortalidade , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Viagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Cardiologia/normas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Sistema de Registros/normas , Cardiologia/ética , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Conflito de Interesses , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/ética , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/ética , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/ética , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/normas , Humanos , Relações Interinstitucionais , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/ética , Melhoria de Qualidade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/ética , Sistema de Registros/ética , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gaps between evidence and practice in the care of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) in the United States suggest major opportunities for improvement. However, the organizational factors and implementation approaches that influence adherence to national guidelines are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to explore the degree to which providers in the Veterans Health Administration system adhere to CHF clinical practice guidelines, and to identify facility-level factors influencing adherence. DESIGN: In a national cross-sectional study, facility quality managers were surveyed regarding quality improvement efforts, guideline implementation, and context. These data were linked to organizational structure data and provider adherence data from chart reviews. The unit of analysis was the facility. The data were adjusted for the average number of comorbidities per CHF patient. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to model factors affecting adherence to CHF guidelines. SAMPLE: The sample consisted of 143 Veterans Administration Medical Centers with ambulatory care clinics. RESULTS: The quality manager survey included data from 91% of facilities. Facility-level estimates of provider adherence measures were, on average, 85% or more for most measures. In multivariate analyses, facilities with higher levels of adherence were more likely to have: (1) providers who had been given a brief guideline summary, (2) providers receptive to the guidelines, (3) guideline-specific task forces to support implementation, and 4) a well-planned implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare organizations should adapt implementation to meet local conditions, including creating guideline-specific task forces, developing a well-planned implementation process, fostering provider buy-in, and providing guideline summaries to providers.