Rules of acupoint selection and drug use in clinical treatment of hypertension with acupoint application therapy / 中国针灸

OBJECTIVE@#To explore the rules of acupoint selection and drug use in treatment of hypertension with acupoint application therapy.@*METHODS@#The articles of the clinical research of hypertension treated with acupoint application therapy were retrieved from Chinese journal full-text database (CNKI), VIP database (VIP) and Wanfang databases from the time of establishment to January 20, 2019. The database was set up with Microsoft Excel 2010. Using the cloud platform of the ancient and modern medicine record, the frequency statistical and clustering analyses were conducted.@*RESULTS@#A total of 117 articles were collected, including 191 prescriptions, 60 aucpoints and 236 kinds of herbal drugs. It was found in the frequency statistical analysis that the top 6 acupoints in use frequency were Yongquan (KI 1), Quchi (LI 11), Taichong (LR 3), Shenque (CV 8), Sanyinjiao (SP 6) and Neiguan (PC 6). According to the correlation analysis, corresponding to these top 6 acupoints, the pairs of acupoints were Sanyinjiao (SP 6) and Yongquan (KI 1), Shenque (CV 8) and Yongquan (KI 1), Neiguan (PC 6) and Yongquan (KI 1), Zusanli (ST 36) and Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Sanyinjiao (SP 6) and Neiguan (PC 6) with Yongquan (KI 1), as well as Yongquan (KI 1) and Neiguan (PC 6) with Sanyinjiao (SP 6). The dominant meridians were the kidney meridian, the conception vessel and the bladder meridian. The special acupoints referred to -source point, -connecting point, back- point and front- point. The top 3 herbal drugs in use frequency included , and . The herbs used were mainly warm and slight cold in nature and neutral in property. The frequencies of the drug use were similar in the application for cold and heat purposes. The common flavors of the herbal medicines were pungent, sweat and bitter and the liver, kidney and spleen meridians were generally involved in meridian tropism.@*CONCLUSION@#In treatment of hypertension with acupoint application therapy, the commonly used single acupoint is Yongquan (KI 1), which is generally combined with Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Shenque (CV 8), Neiguan (PC 6) and Zusanli (ST 36). The correlation is emphasized on the application of special acupoints, meridian points and organs. The vesicatory herbal drugs are predominant in the drug use. In generally, this therapy embodies the treatment principles as tonifying for the deficiency and reducing for the excess, as well as balancing of cold and heat.

Optimal cumulative cisplatin dose in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on induction chemotherapy response.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients can be separated into two risk subgroups according to tumor responses to induction chemotherapy (IC). We aimed to elucidate the optimal cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for different NPC patient subgroups. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A total of 990 patients with incident NPC diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 treated with IC plus CCRT were included in our observational study. The clinicopathological features of patients with different tumor responses were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Prognosis was assessed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. In addition, acute and late toxicities were compared between different CCD groups. RESULTS: After IC, 761/990 (76.9%) patients had a complete tumor response (CR)/partial response (PR) and 229 (23.1%) had stable disease (SD)/disease progression (PD). An unsatisfactory tumor response (SD/PD) after IC correlated with poor clinical outcome (3-year PFS 61.4% vs. 83.2%, P < 0.001 and 3-year LRFS 80.9% vs. 94.5%, P < 0.001). Patients who achieved CR/PR after IC received a CCD >200 mg/m2 and showed higher 3-year PFS and DMFS rates than those receiving a CCD <100 mg/m2 (PFS: 85.4% vs. 77.9%, P = 0.045; DMFS: 89.4% vs. 77.9%, P = 0.015). Multivariate analysis also showed that CCD was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and DMFS in CR/PR subgroup. Moreover, the medium dose group showed similar efficacy as high dose group but was associated with fewer grade 1-4 acute toxicities. However, application of different CCD didn't result in significantly different survival outcomes in SD/PD subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor response to IC was an independent prognostic factor for patients with NPC. For the patients who achieved CR/PR after IC, patients receiving high CCD showed significantly improved 3-year PFS and DMFS compared with patients receiving low CCD. Balancing toxicity and efficacy, 200 mg/m2 seemed to be the optimal dose in the CR/PR groups. However, enhancement of CCD did not provide survival benefit for patients who achieved SD/PD after IC, and treatment options for these patients require further consideration.