Prediction of response to lomustine-based chemotherapy in glioma patients at recurrence using MRI and FET PET.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (FET) PET and MRI for early response assessment in recurrent glioma patients treated with lomustine-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Thirty-six adult patients with WHO CNS grade 3 or 4 gliomas (glioblastoma, 69%) at recurrence (median number of recurrences, 1; range, 1-3) were retrospectively identified. Besides MRI, serial FET PET scans were performed at baseline and early after chemotherapy initiation (not later than two cycles). Tumor-to-brain ratios (TBR), metabolic tumor volumes (MTV), the occurrence of new distant hotspots with a mean TBR >1.6 at follow-up, and the dynamic parameter time-to-peak were derived from all FET PET scans. PET parameter thresholds were defined using ROC analyses to predict PFS of ≥6 months and OS of ≥12 months. MRI response assessment was based on RANO criteria. The predictive values of FET PET parameters and RANO criteria were subsequently evaluated using univariate and multivariate survival estimates. RESULTS: After treatment initiation, the median follow-up time was 11 months (range, 3-71 months). Relative changes of TBR, MTV, and RANO criteria predicted a significantly longer PFS (all P ≤ .002) and OS (all P ≤ .045). At follow-up, the occurrence of new distant hotspots (n ≥ 1) predicted a worse outcome, with significantly shorter PFS (P = .005) and OS (P < .001). Time-to-peak changes did not predict a significantly longer survival. Multivariate survival analyses revealed that new distant hotspots at follow-up FET PET were most potent in predicting non-response (P < .001; HR, 8.578). CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that FET PET provides complementary information to RANO criteria for response evaluation of lomustine-based chemotherapy early after treatment initiation.

Cost Effectiveness of 18F-FET PET for Early Treatment Response Assessment in Glioma Patients After Adjuvant Temozolomide Chemotherapy.

In light of increasing health-care costs, higher medical expenses should be justified socioeconomically. Therefore, we calculated the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of PET using the radiolabeled amino acid O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) compared with conventional MRI for early identification of responders to adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. A recently published study in isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioma patients suggested that 18F-FET PET parameter changes predicted a significantly longer survival already after 2 cycles whereas MRI changes were not significant. Methods: To determine the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of serial 18F-FET PET imaging, we analyzed published clinical data and calculated the associated costs from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance system. Based on a decision-tree model, the effectiveness of 18F-FET PET and MRI was calculated-that is, the probability to correctly identify a responder as defined by an overall survival of at least 15 mo. To determine the cost effectiveness, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated-that is, the cost for each additionally identified responder by 18F-FET PET who would have remained undetected by MRI. The robustness of the results was tested by deterministic and probabilistic Monte Carlo sensitivity analyses. Results: Compared with MRI, 18F-FET PET increased the rate of correctly identified responders to chemotherapy by 26%; thus, 4 patients needed to be examined by 18F-FET PET to identify 1 additional responder. Considering the respective costs for serial 18F-FET PET and MRI, the ICER resulted in €4,396.83 for each additional correctly identified responder by 18F-FET PET. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: In contrast to conventional MRI, the model suggests that 18F-FET PET is cost-effective in terms of ICER values. Considering the high cost of temozolomide, the integration of 18F-FET PET has the potential to avoid premature chemotherapy discontinuation at reasonable cost.