Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urology ; 87: 82-7, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26519000

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine hospital-level variation in outcomes following benign urologic surgeries given that hospital-level variation in surgical outcomes can portend quality and appropriateness of care concerns and identify quality improvement opportunities in perioperative care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System, we identified patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL), and pyeloplasty from 2003 to 2008. We classified prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS) as that exceeding the 75th percentile, and we measured the rate of Agency for Healthcare Quality Patient Safety Indicators, readmissions, and death. We calculated hospital-specific observed-to-expected event rates using random effects multilevel multivariable models adjusted for age and comorbidity. RESULTS: We identified 6699 TURP patients at 54 hospitals, 2541 PCNL patients at 45 hospitals, and 584 pyeloplasty patients at 36 hospitals. Complication rates were highest after PCNL (22.9% prolonged LOS vs 17.3% for TURP and 13.9% for pyeloplasty, P < .001; 3.4% 90-day mortality vs 0.6% for TURP and 0% for pyeloplasty). Hospital-level variation was most substantial for LOS after TURP and pyeloplasty (8.1% and 14.3% of variance in prolonged LOS, respectively). CONCLUSION: Hospital-level variation is common after benign inpatient urologic surgeries and may relate to difference in perioperative provider practice patterns. The morbidity of PCNL in this study was higher than expected and merits further investigation.


Assuntos
Hospitais , Pacientes Internados , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/normas , Idoso , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Washington
2.
J Sex Med ; 9(8): 2104-10, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22759697

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a significant problem among aging men. ED is independently associated with cardiovascular (CV) events (angina, myocardial infarction, and stroke). AIM: We sought to determine if ED was associated with CV death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of CV death in men with ED. METHODS: Exactly 31,296 men in Washington aged 50-76 completed a questionnaire in 2000-2002 on supplements, diet, exercise, personal health, and ED. ED was determined by one question: "Have you experienced impotence in the last year?" We excluded patients with a history of coronary artery disease or stroke. Participants linked yearly through 2008 to the Washington State Death Certificate System. CV death was defined by death certificates listing CV-related deaths (International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision [ICD-10] codes: I00-I15, I20-I52, and I60-I99). We performed multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression adjusting for age, marital status, race, education, self-rating of health, body mass index (BMI), antihypertensive/lipid-lowering drug use, diabetes, family history of CV disease, smoking, and exercise. RESULTS: About 7,762 men had ED and there were 486 CV deaths over 7.8-year average follow-up. The typical man who suffered CV death was older, single, reporting poor health, taking antihypertensives, higher BMI, a smoker, a diabetic, and had a family history of CV disease. When adjusting for age, marital status, and education only, men with ED had a 23% increased risk of CV death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01, 1.49). With further adjustment for known risk factors for CV disease (diabetes, treatment for hypertension or hyperlipidemia, family history of myocardial infarction/stroke, BMI, and exercise), ED no longer predicted CV death (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76, 1.15). CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based cohort, ED was not independently associated with an elevated risk of CV death. These data do not contradict prior data associating ED and CV events but rather suggest that ED may be a manifestation of other known risk factors for CV disease.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Diabetes Mellitus , Exercício Físico , Humanos , Incidência , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Autorrelato , Washington/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA