Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Revista
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Nutr ; 145(3): 514-9, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25733467

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The zinc content of maize, a major global food staple, is generally insufficient alone to meet the requirements of young children. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether substitution of biofortified maize (34 µg zinc/g grain) for control maize (21 µg zinc/g) was adequate to meet zinc physiologic requirements in young children for whom maize was the major food staple. A secondary objective was to compare total daily zinc absorption when maize flour was fortified with zinc oxide to a total concentration of 60 µg zinc/g. METHODS: Participants included 60 rural Zambian children with a mean age of 29 mo who were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 maize types (control, biofortified, or fortified) all of which were readily consumed (>100 g on 1 d). Total daily zinc intake (from maize and low-zinc relish) was determined from duplicate diet collections. Multiplication by fractional absorption of zinc, measured by a dual isotope ratio technique, determined the total daily zinc absorption on the day the test meals were given. RESULTS: The mean ± SD total daily zinc intake (milligrams per day) from the biofortified maize (5.0 ± 2.2) was higher (P < 0.0001) than for the control maize (2.3 ± 0.9). Intake of zinc from the fortified maize (6.3 ± 2.6) did not differ from the biofortified maize. Fractional absorption of zinc from control maize (0.28 ± 0.10) did not differ from the biofortified maize (0.22 ± 0.06). Total daily absorption of zinc (milligrams per day) from the biofortified maize (1.1 ± 0.5) was higher (P = 0.0001) than for the control maize (0.6 ± 0.2), but did not differ from the fortified maize (1.2 ± 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that feeding biofortified maize can meet zinc requirements and provide an effective dietary alternative to regular maize for this vulnerable population. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02208635.


Assuntos
Dieta , Alimentos Fortificados , População Rural , Zea mays/química , Zinco/administração & dosagem , Zinco/farmacocinética , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Farinha/análise , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino
2.
J Nutr ; 144(12): 2059-65, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25411039

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Environmental enteropathy (EE) is subclinical, diffuse villous atrophy characterized by T cell infiltration of the small intestinal mucosa associated with nutrient malabsorption and stunting. EE is assessed by the lactulose:mannitol (L:M) test, whereby nonmetabolized sugars are ingested and quantified in the urine. Multiple micronutrient (MN) deficiency morphologically mimics EE, and ω-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids reduce mucosal inflammation in Crohn disease. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that supplementary MNs, with or without fish oil (FO), would improve L:M in rural Malawian children aged 1-3 y compared with a control (C) group receiving a placebo. METHODS: The MNs and FO provided the Recommended Dietary Intake for 26 vitamins, minerals, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid. This was a 3-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, with the primary outcomes being the change in L:M (ΔL:M) after 12 and 24 wk of supplementation. Comparisons were made for ΔL:M after 12 and 24 wk within each group by using a Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test, because the data are not normally distributed. RESULTS: A total of 230 children had specimens adequate for analysis; all had an abnormal baseline L:M, defined as >0.10. After 12 wk, children who received MNs + FO had a ΔL:M [mean (95% CI)] of -0.10 (-0.04, -0.15; P = 0.001), and children receiving only MNs had ΔL:M of -0.12 (-0.03, -0.21; P = 0.002). After 24 wk, children who received MNs + FO had a ΔL:M of -0.09 (-0.03, -0.15; P = 0.001); children receiving only MNs had a ΔL:M of -0.11 (-0.02, -0.20; P = 0.001), and the C group had ΔL:M of -0.07 (0.02, -0.16); P = 0.002). Linear growth was similar in all groups, ∼4.3 cm over 24 wk. CONCLUSION: Although the effect was modest, these data suggest MNs can transiently ameliorate EE in rural African children. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01593033.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Enteropatias/tratamento farmacológico , Micronutrientes/administração & dosagem , Pré-Escolar , Análise por Conglomerados , Ácidos Docosa-Hexaenoicos/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Ácido Eicosapentaenoico/administração & dosagem , Ingestão de Energia , Ácidos Graxos Insaturados/sangue , Feminino , Óleos de Peixe/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Mucosa Intestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Lactulose/urina , Malaui , Masculino , Manitol/urina , Micronutrientes/deficiência , Avaliação Nutricional , Cooperação do Paciente , Recomendações Nutricionais , Vitamina A/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA