Who uses reproductive health services in the Philippines (and who doesn't)?

PIP: Data from the 1993 National Demographic Survey and the Safe Motherhood Survey have filled gaps in knowledge about the accessibility and use of reproductive health services in the Philippines. Analysis of the data by the East-West Center's Program on Population has revealed that the number of women using family planning (FP) and maternal health services has risen to 40% in 1993 from 17% in 1973. Modest gains were also seen in the past five years despite disruption to program efforts. Prenatal care showed the greatest maternal care coverage rate increase, but 70% of births occurred at home, with only 51% attended by a trained person, and only 32% of postpartum women received care. Adolescents and women who are over age 40, uneducated, Muslim, and/or live in a rural setting have the most unmet need. In addition, less than half of the women reporting symptoms of a sexually transmitted disease sought treatment from a trained practitioner. Most women use public sector services, including 71% of those using modern contraceptives. While trained midwives provided 58% of prenatal care, traditional birth attendants delivered 52% of all births, and a high incidence of maternal mortality persists (209/100,000). Recommendations arising from this analysis include 1) improving prenatal and delivery care, 2) strengthening postpartum FP services, 3) expanding the program to reach more women, 4) extending the range of reproductive health services offered, 5) integrating traditional practitioners into the reproductive health system, and 6) balancing cost and service variations between the public and private sectors.^ieng

Evidence mounts for sex-selective abortion in Asia.

PIP: In Korea, China, and Taiwan--countries where son preference persists--the availability of prenatal screening techniques and induced abortion has produced an imbalance in the naturally occurring sex ratios of 104-107 male births for every 100 female births. Policy responses to sex-selective abortion were the focus of a 1994 International Symposium on Sex Preference for Children in the Rapidly Changing Demographic Dynamics in Asia sponsored by the United Nations Population Fund and the Government of the Republic of Korea. Modern technology (i.e., amniocentesis, ultrasound, and chorionic villi sampling) enables couples to control both family size and sex selection. According to data from the 1990 Korean Census, 80,000 female fetuses were aborted from 1986-90 as a result of son preference. In the late 1980s, the Governments of Korea, China, and India imposed bans on the use of medical technology for prenatal sex determination, but many observers maintain that regulations have served only to make the procedures clandestine and more expensive. To remedy the problems underlying sex-selective abortion, the Symposium recommended the following government actions: 1) implement policies and programs to diminish gender discrimination; 2) establish guidelines for the monitoring and regulation of prenatal testing; 3) utilize mass and folk media, interpersonal channels, and school curricula to promote gender equality; 4) strengthen the ethics curriculum of medical schools to address son preference; and 5) increase the capability of statistical and research organizations to collect gender-disaggregated data.^ieng