Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 283(6): 1193-8, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20505947

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with elective cesarean sections with planned vaginal delivery. METHODS: A total of 178 women with elective cesarean section were compared with the next parity- and age-matched women presenting in spontaneous labor. Our analysis was restricted to a sample of low-risk obstetrical women. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were the main outcome variables of interest. Maternal morbidity outcome variables included wound infection, trauma, puerperal febrile morbidity and significant blood loss (>500 ml). Neonatal outcomes were captured by Apgar scores, cord pH as well as the occurrence of neonatal infections. RESULTS: A significantly higher rate of puerperal febrile morbidity (n = 46 vs. 14, p = 0.0001) and wound infections (n = 16 vs. 2, p = 0.0001) could be detected in the elective cesarean section group. Additionally, a significant blood loss > 500 ml was more than twice as frequent in the cesarean section group (n = 22 vs. 10, p = 0.03) with non-significant lower postpartum hemoglobin levels being observed (10.4 vs. 11.2 g/dL, p > 0.05). A significant increase for the use of iron supplementation (n = 146 vs. 122, p = 0.002), analgesics (n = 168 vs. 60, p = 0.0001) and antibiotics (n = 48 vs. 18, p = 0.0001) could be found in the puerperal period and hospital admission was prolonged in elective cesarean section (6.8 vs. 3.5 days, p = 0.0001). Additionally, problems in breastfeeding occurred more frequently in this group (n = 18 vs. 4, p = 0.002). Neonatal complications were generally low in both the groups with no significant differences being observed (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The increased maternal morbidity in elective cesarean section included puerperal febrile morbidity, wound infections as well as breastfeeding problems in the postpartum period. Women should be sufficiently counseled regarding the increased risk of these complications.


Assuntos
Resultado da Gravidez , Equilíbrio Ácido-Base , Adulto , Índice de Apgar , Áustria , Traumatismos do Nascimento/etiologia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Aleitamento Materno , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Hemoglobinometria , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Infecção Puerperal/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
2.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 114(10-11): 391-5, 2002 Jun 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12708093

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to assess benefits and possible disadvantages of water births and to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes with normal vaginal deliveries. METHODS: This case-controlled study was carried out between January 2000 and July 2001. A total of 140 women who wanted water births were enrolled into the study. Our analysis was restricted to a sample of women with a gestational age > 37 weeks, a normal sized foetus, a reactive admission cardiotocography, drainage of clear amniotic fluid (if the membranes were already ruptured) and a pregnancy with cephalic presentation. Women with medical or obstetric risk factors were excluded. 140 controls were selected from the delivery database as the next parity-matched normal spontaneous vaginal delivery. RESULTS: A statistically significant lower rate of episiotomies (p = 0.0001) and vaginal trauma (p = 0.03) was detected in the group assigned to water birth, whereas the frequency of perineal tears and labial trauma remained similar in both groups (p > 0.05). A statistically significant decrease in the use of medical analgesia (p = 0.0001) and oxytocin (p = 0.002) was observed in women who had water births. A trend towards a reduction of the length of the first stage of labour was only observed in primiparous women bearing in water, but this reduction did not reach statistically significance (p > 0.05). Manual placenta removal (p = 0.017), severe postpartum haemorrhage (blood loss > 500 ml; p = 0.002) and maternal infection rate (p = 0.03) were statistically significant lower in women who delivered in water. When analysing the postpartum haemoglobin, no statistically significant differences could be observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were detected for neonatal parameters (p > 0.05) between women who had had water births and those choosing conventional vaginal delivery.


Assuntos
Banhos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Resultado da Gravidez , Adolescente , Adulto , Áustria , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Episiotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Tocologia , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/etiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vagina/lesões
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA