Home parenteral nutrition a life-saving therapy in a primary intestinal lymphangiectasia patient affecting the entire GI tract - 3 year follow-up case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Primary intestinal lymphangiectasia (PIL) is a rare protein-losing gastroenteropathy of unknown etiology, characterized by impaired lymphatic vessels drainage. The pathological changes in PIL result in usually localized or diffuse dilatation of intestinal lacteals, leading to leakage of lymphatic fluid rich of proteins, lymphocytes, and immunoglobulins into the intestinal lumen. PIL may be asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic in moderate forms of the disease. In some patients, though, the outcome may be poor or even life-threatening. This case report demonstrates the severity of protein malnutrition, in some cases, and the extent of GI tract affected, requiring to start PN early and the need for its continuation as home parenteral nutrition (HPN). CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of 39-year-old male with Factor V Leiden deficiency, who presented initially with symptoms of malnutrition and anasarca. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological findings pathognomonic for PIL from biopsies of the stomach, small intestine and colon. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The patient was started on low fat, high protein parenteral nutrition from the beginning of the treatment and required a long-term HPN for 3 years, because trials of tapering off and discontinuation of PN led to worsening of the biochemical results and recurrence of symptoms. Patient gradually improved and stabilized with persistent nutritional support. CONCLUSIONS: The presented case report shows the magnitude of nutritional support (HPN) needed for severe PIL patients. HPN offers PIL patients with poor outcome and life-threatening complications a chance to improve and lead a normal life.

Role of Probiotics in Modulating Human Gut Microbiota Populations and Activities in Patients with Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Growing attention has been given to the role of nutrition and alterations of microbial diversity of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer (CRC) pathogenesis. It has been suggested that probiotics and synbiotics modulate enteric microbiota and therefore may be used as an intervention to reduce the risk of CRC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of probiotics/synbiotics administration on gut microbiota in patients with CRC. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched between December 2020 and January 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults with CRC, who have taken probiotics/synbiotics for at least 6 days were included. Changes in gut microbiota and selected biochemical and inflammatory parameters (i.e., hsCRP, IL-2, hemoglobin) were retrieved. RESULTS: The search resulted in 198 original research articles and a final 6 were selected as being eligible, including 457 subjects. The median age of patients was 65.4 years old and they were characterized by the median BMI value: 23.8 kg/m2. The literature search revealed that probiotic/synbiotic administration improved enteric microbiota by increasing the abundance of beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus, Eubacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Bacillus and Bifidobacterium, and decreased the abundance of potentially harmful bacteria such as Fusobacterium, Porhyromonas, Pseudomonas and Enterococcus. Additionally, probiotic/synbiotic intervention improved release of antimicrobials, intestinal permeability, tight junction function in CRC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of probiotics/synbiotics positively modulates enteric microbiota, improves postoperative outcomes, gut barrier function and reduces inflammatory parameters in patients suffering from CRC.

Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: A Bridge to Healing and Biological Therapy in a Patient With Enterocutaneous Fistula and Sepsis Complicated Crohn's Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with severe infections, abscess, or sepsis are ineligible for standard treatment using biological and immunosuppressive drug regimens. We report a case of complicated Crohn's disease with ruptured abdominal abscess, presence of enterocutaneous fistula, and sepsis. We also report and discuss patient management with parenteral nutrition (PN) and enteral nutrition (EN) and treatment outcomes. We report a case of a 31-year-old female with a 10-year history of IBD in clinical remission, who, after previous total proctocolectomy with J-pouch, presented to the clinic with severe abdominal pain of 2 days, unintentional weight loss, fatigue, fever, and abdominal abscess, which ruptured, and her clinical state became complicated by sepsis. PN was initiated using individually prepared admixture according to patient requirements, because of inability to tolerate any oral intake. Following the remittance of ileus symptoms, EN was added using a semielemental formula via a nasojejunal tube. Upon completion of the treatment, the fistula resolved, the wound had healed, and Crohn's Disease Activity Index score showed remission. This qualified the patient for initiation of biological therapy with infliximab. Patients with severe infections, abscesses, or sepsis are ineligible for standard IBD treatment using biological and immunosuppressive drug regimens. Furthermore, usually patients' nutrition condition prevents them from combating infection and initiating proper healing process. This case demonstrates the importance of considering nutrition therapy-PN and EN-in unstable patients who cannot be treated with standard pharmacological therapy. Nutrition therapy offers a bridge that allows patients to stabilize and heal before starting standard pharmacological treatment with immunosuppressive agents or biological therapy.