Preclinical experience with two selective progesterone receptor modulators on breast and endometrium.

Org 31710 and Org 33628 are two highly selective progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) with respect to their anti-progestational and anti-glucocorticoid activity. The compounds have been studied both in vitro and in vivo. Org 33628 has approximately four times stronger anti-progestational activity in vitro than does Org 31710, and in rats it is about 15 times more potent in the pregnancy interruption test. Two main indications for the use of PRMs are breast cancer and fertility regulation. The effects of both Org 31710 and Org 33628 were tested in relevant models for these indications. The effects of the two compounds on breast tumor development were assessed and in rats using the DMBA model. Their potency in menses induction was tested in monkeys on a 4-day regimen in the luteal phase, and after a single dose at day 21 of the normal cycle, and under a continuous progestin treatment using desogestrel. The compounds were also tested alone in a continuous low-dose regimen. The effects on follicular development and ovulation were determined by measuring estradiol and progesterone levels. Cycle control was monitored by daily vaginal swabs. In the DMBA model, Org 31710 at oral doses of 0.8, 2.0, and 5.0 mg/kg showed a clear dose-related reduction in tumor load. With the two highest doses, an even lower tumor load was seen after a 3-week treatment period compared to the tumor load at the start of treatment. Org 33628 showed a similar efficacy as Org 31710 at a dose of 2.0 mg/kg. RU 486 after oral treatment was two times less potent in this model than Org 31710 and Org 33628. The efficacy of menses induction using the 4-day regimen is dependent on the time of administration relative to the progesterone peak in the luteal phase. The highest efficacy is achieved in the descending part of the peak, at which a 100% success rate is found with a dose of 1 mg/kg of either Org 31710 or Org 33628. In Cynomolgus monkeys, at a single dose of 15 mg/kg of Org 31710 or Org 33628 in the luteal phase, menses induction was achieved only in 60% of the treatment cycles. Surprisingly menses induction can be achieved with a single dose that is about a ten-times lower when the monkeys are treated continuously with desogestrel. Cycle control is better at low than at high doses of antiprogestin in combination with daily dosing of 4 microg/kg desogestrel. Despite the difference in receptor affinity, no difference between Org 31710 and Org 33628 was found in menses induction. In the continuous low-dose (1 mg/kg) regimen with the PRMs, follicular development occurs normally while ovulation is inhibited. Ovulation is resumed shortly after stopping treatment, and a normal menses occurs after the first progesterone peak. Both compounds may be interesting options for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer and for fertility control.

Once weekly azithromycin therapy for prevention of Mycobacterium avium complex infection in patients with AIDS: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial.

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of azithromycin (1,200 mg once weekly) for the prevention of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection in patients with AIDS and a CD4 cell count of < 100/mm3. In an intent-to-treat analysis through the end of therapy plus 30 days, nine (10.6%) of 85 azithromycin recipients and 22 (24.7%) of 89 placebo recipients developed MAC infection (hazard ratio, 0.34; P = .004). There was no difference in the ranges of minimal inhibitory concentrations of either clarithromycin or azithromycin for the five breakthrough (first) MAC isolates from the azithromycin group and the 18 breakthrough MAC isolates from the placebo group. Of the 76 patients who died during the study, four (10.5%) of 38 azithromycin recipients and 12 (31.6%) of 38 placebo recipients had a MAC infection followed by death (P = .025). For deaths due to all causes, there was no difference in time to death or number of deaths between the two groups. Episodes of non-MAC bacterial infection per 100 patient years occurred in 43 azithromycin recipients and 88 placebo recipients (relative risk, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.73). The most common toxic effect noted during the study was gastrointestinal, reported by 78.9% of azithromycin recipients and 27.5% of placebo recipients. Azithromycin given once weekly is safe and effective in preventing disseminated MAC infection, death due to MAC infection, and respiratory tract infections in patients with AIDS and CD4 cell counts of < 100/mm3.

Antiinflammatory C-glucosyl chromone from Aloe barbadensis.

A new antiinflammatory agent identified as 8-[C-beta-D-[2-O-(E)-cinnamoyl]glucopyranosyl]-2- [(R)-2-hydroxypropyl]-7-methoxy-5-methylchromone (1) has been isolated from Aloe barbadensis Miller. At a dose of 200 microg/mouse ear, 1 exhibited topical antiinflammatory activity equivalent to 200 microg/ear of hydrocortisone. There was no reduction in thymus weight caused by treatment with 1 for any of the doses tested, while 200 microg/ear of hydrocortisone resulted in a 50% decrease in thymus weight.

Multiple transcription start sites for the GnRH gene in rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys: a non-human primate model for studying GnRH gene regulation.

In humans, transcription of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) gene can be initiated at two transcription start sites to produce different GnRH mRNAs. The upstream transcription start site is used only in reproductive tissues and tumors. To determine if a similar pattern of GnRH gene expression exists in non-human primates, we cloned GnRH cDNA from rhesus monkey hypothalamic RNA using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the 5' flanking region of the monkey GnRH gene by PCR. A 96% similarity between monkey and human GnRH cDNA was found with 94% similarity in the upstream promoter region. An upstream transcriptional start site, was identified in cynomolgus monkey testicular mRNA, 504 base pairs upstream from the hypothalamic site, which was different from that identified in the human GnRH gene. Various cynomolgus monkey reproductive tissues were found to utilize this upstream transcriptional start site. In contrast, no evidence was found for the use of upstream transcriptional start sites in rat testis or placenta, suggesting that the reproductive tissue specificity of the upstream transcription start site may be a primate specific feature.

Inhibition of ovulation by progestin analogs (agonists vs antagonists): preliminary evidence for different sites and mechanisms of actions.

Continuous administration of the antiprogesterone RU486 inhibits ovulation in women and in monkeys; in this regard RU486 may act as a progestin agonist rather than as an antagonist. We compared the site(s) and mechanism(s) of RU486-induced ovulation inhibition with those of levonorgestrel (LNG). Six regularly menstruating cynomolgus monkeys each received placebo, RU486 (1 mg/kg/d) or LNG (2 g/kg/d) i.m. between days (cd) 2-22 of three separate menstrual cycles. Serum levels of estradiol (E2), progesterone (P4), androstenedione, LH and FSH were analyzed by RIAs in daily blood samples. Basal and GnRH-stimulated (1 and 50 g of GnRH i.v. 2 h apart) secretion of LH and FSH was assessed using serial blood samples collected for 12 h on cd 10. Mean cycle length was prolonged by RU486 and LNG treatments from 32 d to 70 d and 52 d, respectively (p < 0.02). Ovulation was inhibited in five of the six primates during RU486, and in all six during LNG treatment. During RU486 treatment, serum E2 levels were similar to those of the control cycle; despite peaks of E2 secretion, no LH peaks were seen. In contrast, E2 concentrations were profoundly suppressed during LNG treatment (p < 0.005). The reduction in serum E2 was accompanied by lower levels of androstenedione, and suppressed ratio of E2/androstenedione (p < 0.02) suggesting both reduced synthesis and aromatization of androgen precursors during administration of LNG. Consequently, LNG treatment was associated with higher levels of serum FSH and LH (p < 0.001; 1-way ANOVA). Similarly, as during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, the amplitude of basal LH-pulses was increased during LNG treatment (p < 0.05), whereas RU486 treatment did not affect basal LH secretion. The GnRH-stimulated release of LH was similar during the placebo, RU486 and LNG cycles; enhanced release of FSH was seen during administration of LNG. Thus, in the present model system, RU486 seems to inhibit ovulation mainly at the level of hypothalamus, possibly by interfering with the steroidal positive feedback signals from the ovary. However, LNG inhibits ovulation differently, most likely via direct progesterone-like effects on folliculogenesis and the hypothalamus. The pituitary does not appear to be the major site of action(s) of RU486 or LNG. Thus, the differential mechanisms of ovulation inhibition by RU486 and LNG seem to result from lesser intraovarian impact of RU486 as well as dissimilar influences on tonic gonadotropin secretory levels. We conclude that when inhibiting ovulation, RU486 does not act as a progestin agonist, but rather, functions through a hypothalamic mechanism(s), which might be unique to RU486 as a progesterone antagonist.

PIP: Researchers administered a placebo, 1 mg/kg/day of RU-486, and 2 g/kg/day of levonorgestrel (LNG) to six regularly cycling cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) during days 2-22 of three separate treatment cycles in order to compare the site(s) and mechanism(s) of ovulation inhibition of RU-486 with those of LNG. One rest cycle separated the placebo and RU-486 cycles and at least two menstrual cycles separated the RU-486 and LNG cycles to ensure complete clearance of RU-486. Both RU-486 and LNG significantly prolonged the mean cycle length (from 32 days to 70 days and 52 days, respectively; p 0.02). During RU-486 treatment, five of the six monkeys did not ovulate, while during LNG treatment all six monkeys did not ovulate. Serum estradiol (E2) levels during RU-486 corresponded with those during the control cycle. There were peaks of E2 secretion during RU-486, but no peaks of luteinizing hormone (LH). E2 levels fell significantly during LNG treatment (p 0.005). Androstenedione levels also decreased significantly (p = 0.001) during LNG treatment, as well as the ratio of E2/androstenedione (p 0.02), suggesting that LNG inhibits aromatase activity. LNG treatment increased serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and LH (p 0.001). Just like during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, the amplitude of basal LH pulses increased during LNG treatment (p 0.05). RU-486 did not alter basal LH secretion. LNG treatment amplified release of FSH. Neither RU-486 nor LNG affected the gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulated release of FSH. These findings suggest that RU-486 inhibits ovulation largely at the hypothalamus level, perhaps by obstructing the steroidal positive feedback signals from the ovary. LNG likely inhibits ovulation through direct progesterone-like effects on folliculogenesis and the hypothalamus. Neither progestin analog seems to act at the pituitary level. In conclusion, RU-486 does not function as a typical progestin agonist but through a hypothalamic mechanism or mechanisms that are probably unique to RU-486.

In vivo effects of a potent GnRH antagonist ORG 30850: physiologic evidence that down-regulation of GnRH receptors does not occur.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the pituitary responsiveness to exogenous GnRH in GnRH antagonist-suppressed ovariectomized monkeys. METHODS: This was a prospective experimental non-human primate study performed at the research laboratories of The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine. Seventeen long-term ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys were studied. INTERVENTIONS: The GnRH antagonist ORG 30850 was administered to long-term ovariectomized monkeys assigned to one of six groups: single subcutaneous injections in group A (n = 4), 0.3 mg/kg; group B (n = 4), 1.0 mg/kg; and group C (n = 3), 3.0 mg/kg; and six consecutive daily subcutaneous injections in group D (n = 2), 0.3 mg/kg; group E (n = 2), 1.0 mg/kg; and group F (n = 2), 3.0 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected daily from 10 days before treatment until 22 days after treatment, then weekly for 6 additional weeks. Intravenous GnRH stimulation tests (10 micrograms/kg) were performed on the day after vehicle injection (control) and the day after completion of treatment(s), and then at weekly intervals. The main outcome measures were serum levels of LH, FSH, and ORG 30850. RESULTS: Administration of ORG 30850 resulted in suppression (P < .05) of LH and FSH in all treatment groups. Long-term suppression (greater than 2 weeks) was evident in all primates receiving a cumulative dose of at least 1 mg/kg. Paradoxically, the responsiveness of the pituitary to exogenous GnRH was accentuated during the time of maximal tonic LH/FSH suppression. CONCLUSIONS: ORG 30850 is a potent long-acting GnRH antagonist. Furthermore, the present in vivo demonstration of heightened pituitary responsiveness to exogenous GnRH emphasizes the divergent mechanisms of action of GnRH antagonists and GnRH agonists.

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of inflammation associated with the temporomandibular joint.

Noninvasive early recognition and treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction remains a diagnostic challenge. This pilot study evaluated the use of phosphorus 31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy with magnetic resonance imaging to measure alterations in pH and high-energy phosphate metabolite ratios of muscle that is adjacent to an inflamed temporomandibular joint. Ten New Zealand white rabbits were used in this study. Two animals were used to develop signal acquisition protocols and to ensure that stable baseline data could be measured. In each of the eight animals used in the experiment, one temporomandibular joint was injected with a suspension of silica particles and the contralateral joint served as a control. Data were collected from control and experimental joints on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28, after the injection. At the end of the study, temporomandibular joints were block resected and histologically examined to confirm the presence of an inflammatory response. Results indicated that pH and metabolite ratios could be obtained by 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Changes in pH and some metabolite ratios in experimental joints showed statistical significance (p < 0.001). Differences were seen on day 2 and day 7 (p = 0.040 and p = 0.008, respectively) in the phosphocreatine/alpha-adenosine triphosphate ratios. This contrasts with phosphocreatine/beta adenosine triphosphate ratios that showed significance that began at day 7 (p = 0.022) and continued to day 14 (p = 0.025). Histologic examination indicated that the tissue response within the joint capsule was less than the granulomatous reaction expected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

New trends in combined use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists with gonadotropins or pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone in ovulation induction and assisted reproductive technologies.

The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists as adjunctive therapy with gonadotropins for ovulation induction in in vitro fertilization and other assisted reproductive technologies has become common clinical practice. With the recent advent of potent gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists free from the marked histamine-release effects that stymied earlier compounds, an attractive alternative method may be available. We have established the feasibility of combining gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist-induced inhibition of endogenous gonadotropins with exogenous gonadotropin therapy for ovulation induction in a nonhuman primate model. Here, the principal benefits to be gained from using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist rather than the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist are the immediate inhibition of pituitary gonadotropin secretion without the "flare effect," which brings greater safety and convenience for patients and the medical team and saves time and money. We have also recently demonstrated the feasibility of combining gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist with pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy for the controlled restoration of gonadotropin secretion and gonadal steroidogenesis culminating in apparently normal (singleton) ovulatory cycles. This is feasible only with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists because, unlike gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, they achieve control of the pituitary-ovarian axis without down regulation of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor system. This capacity to override gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist-induced suppression of pituitary-ovarian function may allow new treatment modalities to be employed for women who suffer from chronic hyperandrogenemia with polycystic ovarian disease.

GnRH antagonists suppress prolactin release in non-human primates.

GnRH antagonists, such as Antide, are being evaluated for potential contraceptive applications. Although their contraceptive efficacy clearly results from their rapid inhibitory effects on gonadotropin release, there remains the possibility of other incidental effects. Under certain physiological conditions, the release of prolactin (Prl) appears to be temporally related to the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and hence by inference to the secretion of GnRH. Here, we examined the effects of the GnRH antagonist Antide on the release of LH and Prl. Under agonadal conditions, a remarkable concordance was seen between LH and Prl pulses with up to 100% of pulses being coincident. Administration of Antide resulted in a rapid parallel decline in both LH and Prl with LH levels falling by 50% within 2 h and Prl levels falling by 30-40%. At this dose of Antide (1.0 mg/kg, sc), pulsatile release of LH and Prl continued albeit at a much reduced amplitude. The administration of a bolus of exogenous GnRH in the face of GnRHant-induced suppression resulted in prompt release of LH and Prl in all 3 monkeys. Since Antide inhibits the release of LH and Prl in a parallel fashion, and GnRH re-stimulates the release of both hormones in a parallel fashion, we conclude that the synchronous pulsatile release of LH and Prl observed in the agonadal monkey is due to a direct action of GnRH. What this action is for Prl release, and how it relates to the control of dopamine or other neuroendocrine mechanisms normally controlling the release of Prl remains unclear. It also remains to be seen whether this GnRH antagonist-induced suppression of Prl will have physiologic significance.

Antide bioavailability: single dose administration for suppression of testosterone and inhibin in male monkeys.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single sc injection of Antide on testosterone (T) and inhibin secretion in intact male cynomolgus monkeys were examined. Fifteen primates were randomized to three groups receiving: propylene glycol and water vehicle, 3 mg/kg Antide, and 10 mg/kg of Antide. Antide at the 10 mg/kg dose caused long-term suppression of T ranging from 24-56 days. At the 3 mg/kg dose, suppression of T was of shorter duration. Serum Antide levels were significantly greater in the 10 mg/kg group than the 3 mg/kg group (p less than 0.02), both initially and through 35 days post-treatment. The duration of testosterone inhibition and sustained Antide levels were significantly correlated (p less than 0.01). Inhibin concentrations followed the same general pattern as testosterone reaching a nadir on day 21 post-treatment before subsequent recovery. The prolonged suppressive effect of Antide on T without detectable side effects makes this compound an excellent candidate for clinical evaluation.

Inhibition of pituitary gonadotropin secretion by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist antide. I. In vitro studies on mechanism of action.

The GnRH antagonist antide is among the most promising "third generation" compounds available for clinical evaluation. In primates, antide manifests prolonged (several weeks) and reversible inhibition of pituitary gonadotropin secretion after a single high dose injection. In the present study, we have examined the effects of antide on pituitary gonadotropin secretion in vitro. Dispersed anterior pituitary cells from adult female rats were plated (48 h; 5 x 10(5) cells/well), washed, and exposed to increasing concentrations of antide for up to 48 h. Media were removed, and cells were washed twice and then incubated with GnRH (1 x 10(-8) M) plus antide for 4 h. Media and cell lysates were assayed for LH/FSH by RIA. Antide had no effect on basal LH/FSH secretion at any dose tested (10(-6)-10(-12) M). In contrast, GnRH-stimulated LH/FSH secretion was inhibited by this GnRH antagonist in a dose- and time-dependent manner. When incubated simultaneously, antide blocked GnRH-stimulated gonadotropin secretion, with a maximal effect at 10(-6) M (ED50, 10(-7) M). Preincubation of pituitary cells with antide for 6-48 h before GnRH exposure shifted the dose-response curve to the left; the maximally effective dose was 10(-8) M; the ED50 was 10(-10) M antide after 48-h preincubation. Intracellular LH/FSH levels increased concomitant with the decrease in secreted gonadotropins. Total LH/FSH levels (secreted plus cell content) remained unchanged. The inhibition of LH secretion by antide was specific for GnRH-stimulated gonadotropin secretion; antide had no effect on K(+)-stimulated LH secretion. Moreover, antide had little or no residual effect on LH secretion; full recovery of GnRH responsiveness in vitro occurred within 4 h after removal of antide. Lineweaver-Burke analysis of antide inhibition of GnRH-stimulated LH secretion indicated that antide is a direct competitor of GnRH at the level of the pituitary GnRH receptor. In summary, antide is a pure antagonist of GnRH stimulation of gonadotropin secretion; no agonistic actions of antide were manifest in vitro. Moreover, antide has no apparent noxious or toxic effect on pituitary cells in culture; the actions of antide are immediately reversible upon removal of antide from pituitary gonadotropes. We conclude that the long term inhibition of gonadotropin secretion by antide in vivo is not due to deleterious effects of this compound at the level of the pituitary gonadotrope.

Ceftriaxone vs. azlocillin and netilmicin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic children.

Efficacy of the cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, was compared with that of the combination of the aminoglycoside, netilmicin, and the penicillin, azlocillin, in the treatment of febrile episodes in immunocompromised neutropenic children undergoing chemotherapy for neoplastic disease. During 100 separate febrile episodes, 40 strains of bacteria were isolated from the blood of 34 patients and a further 55 strains from other sites. Nine strains (four of which were staphylococci) to both netilmicin and azlocillin. There was no difference in clinical response between the two therapeutic regimens as assessed 4 and 7 days after treatment began. Ceftriaxone had the considerable practical advantages of once daily dosage without a need for blood monitoring. Ceftriaxone would appear to be effective as initial monotherapy in the treatment of bacterial infections in severely neutropenic children.

[The GnRH precursor is present in the anterior pituitary gland and an important increase of its content precedes serum LH surge induced by estradiol-17 beta in female primates]. / Le précurseur du GnRH est présent dans l'antéhypophyse et une augmentation importante de son contenu précède le pic de la LH sérique induit par l'estradiol-17 beta chez la femelle du primate.

Estradiol-17 beta (E2 17 beta) is well known to evoke a preovulatory-like LH surge in ovariectomized monkeys even in the absence of the integrity of the hypothalamo-pituitary connections. LH release from the anterior pituitary (AP) is reliant on stimulation by hypothalamic GnRH which is derived from proteolytic cleavage of a precursor (designated Pro-GnRH-GAP) which also results in the production of an associated peptide (GAP). The present study examined the effects of E2 17 beta on the hypothalamic content of Pro-GnRH-GAP, GnRH and GAP while incidental observations revealed the presence of Pro-GnRH-GAP and its products in the AP. Changes in GnRH and GAP were closely related at all times after E2 17 beta treatment. However, the pattern of change in the hypothalamus and AP was inversely related. Pro-GnRH-GAP levels remained unchanged in the hypothalamus whereas in the AP the peptide increased markedly (48 hrs. post E2 17 beta) prior to the LH surge and declined to low levels (72 hrs. post E2 17 beta) at the time of the LH surge. The increase in Pro-GnRH-GAP in the AP that precedes the rise in GnRH and accompanying LH surge by 24 hrs. strongly indicates that AP GnRH is more important than hypothalamic GnRH for the mediation of the E2 17 beta-induced LH surge in female primate.