Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obes Surg ; 27(1): 169-176, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27506803

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The ReCharge Trial demonstrated that a vagal blocking device (vBloc) is a safe and effective treatment for moderate to severe obesity. This report summarizes 24-month outcomes. METHODS: Participants with body mass index (BMI) 40 to 45 kg/m2, or 35 to 40 kg/m2 with at least one comorbid condition were randomized to either vBloc therapy or sham intervention for 12 months. After 12 months, participants randomized to vBloc continued open-label vBloc therapy and are the focus of this report. Weight loss, adverse events, comorbid risk factors, and quality of life (QOL) will be assessed for 5 years. RESULTS: At 24 months, 123 (76 %) vBloc participants remained in the trial. Participants who presented at 24 months (n = 103) had a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of 21 % (8 % total weight loss [TWL]); 58 % of participants had ≥5 % TWL and 34 % had ≥10 % TWL. Among the subset of participants with abnormal preoperative values, significant improvements were observed in mean LDL (-16 mg/dL) and HDL cholesterol (+4 mg/dL), triglycerides (-46 mg/dL), HbA1c (-0.3 %), and systolic (-11 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressures (-10 mmHg). QOL measures were significantly improved. Heartburn/dyspepsia and implant site pain were the most frequently reported adverse events. The primary related serious adverse event rate was 4.3 %. CONCLUSIONS: vBloc therapy continues to result in medically meaningful weight loss with a favorable safety profile through 2 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01327976.


Assuntos
Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo/instrumentação , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Eletrodos Implantados , Obesidade Mórbida/terapia , Estimulação do Nervo Vago/métodos , Nervo Vago/cirurgia , Adulto , Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo/efeitos adversos , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/metabolismo , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Nervo Vago/patologia , Estimulação do Nervo Vago/efeitos adversos , Estimulação do Nervo Vago/instrumentação , Redução de Peso/fisiologia
2.
Obes Surg ; 22(11): 1771-82, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22956251

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intermittent, reversible intraabdominal vagal blockade (VBLOC® Therapy) demonstrated clinically important weight loss in feasibility trials. EMPOWER, a randomized, double-blind, prospective, controlled trial was conducted in USA and Australia. METHODS: Five hundred three subjects were enrolled at 15 centers. After informed consent, 294 subjects were implanted with the vagal blocking system and randomized to the treated (n = 192) or control (n = 102) group. Main outcome measures were percent excess weight loss (percent EWL) at 12 months and serious adverse events. Subjects controlled duration of therapy using an external power source; therapy involved a programmed algorithm of electrical energy delivered to the subdiaphragmatic vagal nerves to inhibit afferent/efferent vagal transmission. Devices in both groups performed regular, low-energy safety checks. Data are mean ± SEM. RESULTS: Study subjects consisted of 90 % females, body mass index of 41 ± 1 kg/m(2), and age of 46 ± 1 years. Device-related complications occurred in 3 % of subjects. There was no mortality. 12-month percent EWL was 17 ± 2 % for the treated and 16 ± 2 % for the control group. Weight loss was related linearly to hours of device use; treated and controls with ≥ 12 h/day use achieved 30 ± 4 and 22 ± 8 % EWL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VBLOC® therapy to treat morbid obesity was safe, but weight loss was not greater in treated compared to controls; clinically important weight loss, however, was related to hours of device use. Post-study analysis suggested that the system electrical safety checks (low charge delivered via the system for electrical impedance, safety, and diagnostic checks) may have contributed to weight loss in the control group.


Assuntos
Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo/métodos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Obesidade Mórbida/terapia , Nervo Vago , Apetite , Austrália/epidemiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Método Duplo-Cego , Eletrodos Implantados , Feminino , Humanos , Fome , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Redução de Peso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA