Avelumab First-Line Maintenance Therapy: Managing Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 of JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial demonstrated that avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance in addition to best supportive care significantly prolonged overall survival compared to best supportive care alone. It is now the standard of care for platinum-eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma that has not progressed with 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy. OBJECTIVES: This article provides considerations for oncology nurses to effectively implement avelumab 1L maintenance treatment in the clinical setting. METHODS: This article reviews clinical evidence and implications for oncology nurses caring for patients receiving avelumab 1L maintenance treatment. FINDINGS: Oncology nurses can provide comprehensive care for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and ensure the safe and appropriate use of avelumab 1L maintenance treatment by educating patients and caregivers, ensuring correct administration, and promptly recognizing and managing immune-related adverse events.

Avelumab First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Advanced Bladder Cancer: Practical Implementation Steps for Infusion Nurses.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, and avelumab, are used to treat patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Based on data from the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial, avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance is now considered the standard-of-care treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who responded or experienced disease stabilization after 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy, and it is the only category 1 preferred checkpoint inhibitor maintenance option in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for patients with cisplatin-eligible and cisplatin-ineligible locally advanced or metastatic UC. This article reviews key considerations related to avelumab 1L maintenance therapy that infusion nurses should be familiar with, including dosing, administration, and immune-related adverse event recognition and management, to ensure safe and appropriate use of this important and impactful therapy.

The Critical Role of the Oncology Nurse as a Partner in the Management of Patients With Advanced Kidney Cancer: Toxicity Management, Symptom Control, and Palliative Care.

The treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma has changed dramatically since 2005 with the approval of 12 regimens including oral, intravenous, and combination strategies. These approvals have changed the treatment paradigm for these patients and developed new challenges and a critical role for oncology nurses to ensure that the treatment plan and adverse events are managed effectively. The majority of these regimens include an oral anticancer drug, which requires patients and their caregivers to understand the medication, the potential adverse events, the importance of medicine adherence, and the importance of early and ongoing education with the oncology team to maximize clinical outcomes. The evolution of the role of the nurse in meeting this need and its critical contribution to the comprehensive care of the kidney cancer patient will be reviewed.

New therapeutic strategies for renal cell carcinoma.

Treatment options for renal cell carcinoma have changed dramatically since 2005 when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved six new therapies. These agents inhibit pathways relevant in the pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma, interfering with tumor angiogenesis, cell progression, and metastasis. Understanding the pharmacology of these agents is necessary for clinicians to provide appropriate patient education, assure adherence with the treatment plan, and facilitate early identification and intervention for side effects. These activities will provide positive clinical outcomes.

Association of percentage of tumour burden removed with debulking nephrectomy and progression-free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the fractional percentage of tumour volume (FPTV) removed with debulking nephrectomy was associated with progression-free survival (PFS) after subsequent targeted therapy, as a debulking nephrectomy is the standard of care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but there are few data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute Urologic Oncology database was retrospectively reviewed from 2005 to 2008 to identify patients with mRCC who had undergone debulking nephrectomy followed by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy, defined as sunitinib-, sorafenib- or bevacizumab-based therapy. FPTV was calculated as the largest diameter of the primary tumour divided by the total tumour burden (as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, RECIST) through investigator re-review of imaging. PFS was defined from the start date of systemic therapy to disease progression per RECIST criteria. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were identified (80% men, median age 61 years, all clear cell histology and 67% with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0). Patients received treatment with bevacizumab ± interleukin-2 (18), sunitinib (14), sorafenib (11) or sunitinib + bevacizumab (three). The median diameter of the primary tumour was 10.0 cm. The median (range) FPTV removed was 95 (80-99)%. In univariable analysis, the FPTV removed (P = 0.002) and normal haemoglobin level (P = 0.04) were associated with improved PFS. In multivariable analysis, the FPTV removed (P < 0.001), male gender (P = 0.001) and corrected calcium (P = 0.05) were independent predictors of PFS. CONCLUSION: A greater percentage of tumour burden removed at debulking nephrectomy is significantly associated with improved PFS on subsequent VEGF-targeted systemic therapy.

Metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy.

PURPOSE: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with sarcomatoid differentiation is an aggressive disease that is associated with poor outcomes to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The utility of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy in patients with this disease is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had mRCC with sarcomatoid features in the primary tumor and who were treated with VEGF-targeted therapy were retrospectively identified. Pathology slides were reviewed to determine the percentage of sarcomatoid differentiation. Objective response rate, percentage of tumor burden shrinkage, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined. RESULTS: Forty-three patients who had sarcomatoid mRCC were identified. The median percentage of sarcomatoid features was 14% (range, 3% to 90%). Patients were treated with either sunitinib (49%), sorafenib (28%), bevacizumab (19%), or sunitinib plus bevacizumab (5%). Partial responses were observed in eight patients (19%); 21 patients (49%) had stable disease; and 14 patients (33%) had progressive disease as their best response. Partial responses were limited to patients who had underlying clear-cell histology and less than 20% sarcomatoid elements. Median tumor shrinkage was -2% (range, -85% to 127%), and 53% achieved some degree of tumor shrinkage on therapy. Median PFS and OS were estimated to be 5.3 months and 11.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients who have mRCC and sarcomatoid differentiation can demonstrate objective responses and tumor shrinkage to VEGF-targeted therapy. Patients who have clear-cell histology and a lower percentage of sarcomatoid differentiation may have better outcomes with VEGF-targeted therapy.

Sorafenib: a promising new targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma.

Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) frequently occurs at advanced stages, severely limiting the success of treatment, and median survival is barely more than a year. Previously, treatment of renal cancer was limited to nephrectomy or immunotherapy (interleukin or interferon-alpha), which was effective in a small subset of patients but often was accompanied by severe side effects. New orally administered targeted therapies have become available, offering broader benefits to patients with advanced RCC. Sorafenib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as treatment for advanced RCC based on its extension of median progression-free survival from 12-24 weeks. Oncology nurses must ensure patient adherence and manage side effects of emerging treatments. This article reviews the management of skin rash, hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, diarrhea, and fatigue in patients receiving sorafenib. In addition, a case study of a patient receiving sorafenib is presented.