RESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.955421.].
RESUMO
The goal of the study was to analyze whether WJP can alleviate visceral hypersensitivity in IBS-D model rats. In this study, 36 Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats aged 4 weeks old were randomly divided into two groups: the model group (n = 27) and the control group (n = 9). The rat model of IBS-D was established by modified compound methods for 4 weeks. After the modification, IBS-D rats were randomly divided into three groups, namely, the IBS-D model group (n = 9), the positive drug group (n = 9), and the WJP group (n = 9), with different interventions, respectively. The control group was fed and allowed to drink water routinely. The Bristol stool scale scores were used to assess the severity of diarrhea. Abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) scores were used to assess visceral sensitivity. Expression of TNF-α was measured, and histopathological examinations were performed to assess colon inflammation in IBS-D model rats. Key factors of the MEK/ERK signal pathway in the tissue of the colon and hippocampus were measured to analyze the mechanism of WJP. Compared with the control group, the Bristol stool scale scores in the model group were significantly increased (p < 0.0001). The scores of the WJP group were significantly decreased compared with the model group (p = 0.0001). Compared with the control group, AWR scores in the model group at each pressure level were significantly increased (p = 0.0003, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0007, and p = 0.0009). AWR scores of the WJP group were significantly decreased compared with the model group (p = 0.0003, p = 0.0007, p = 0.0007, and p = 0.0009). Compared with the control group, the model group had significantly higher expression of TNF-α in the colon tissue (p < 0.0001). However, the WJP group had significantly lower level of TNF-α compared with the model group (p < 0.0001). Meanwhile, compared with the control group, the relative expression of the proteins of p-MEK1/2, p-ERK1, and p-ERK2 in the colon tissue was significantly increased in the model group (p < 0.0001). Compared with the model group, the relative expression of the proteins in the colon tissue were significantly decreased in the WJP group (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0019, and p = 0.0013). Compared with the control group, the relative expression of the proteins of p-MEK1/2, p-ERK1, and p-ERK2 in the hippocampus tissue were significantly increased in the model group (p < 0.0001). Compared with the model group, the relative expression of the proteins in the hippocampus tissue were significantly decreased in the WJP group (p = 0.0126, p = 0.0291, and p = 0.0145). The results indicated that WJP can alleviate visceral hypersensitivity in IBS-D model rats, possibly mediated by downregulating the expression of TNF-α, p-MEK1/2, p-ERK1, and p-ERK2 in the colon tissue. At the same time, WJP also affects downregulating the expression of p-MEK1/2, p-ERK1, and p-ERK2 in the hippocampus tissue.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common functional gastrointestinal disease. Acupuncture, including electroacupuncture (EA) is widely used as a complementary and alternative treatment for patients with FD. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of EA for the treatment of FD. METHODS: We searched Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library) for randomized controlled trials of FD treated by EA from inception to February 3, 2020. Two reviewers will independently screen studies for data extraction and assess the quality and risk of bias. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool, RevMan 5.3 software were used for meta-analysis. Data were pooled to calculate relative risk and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of substantial improvement after treatment for dichotomous data and mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CIs for continuous data. RESULTS: Seven randomized clinical trials included 853 patients. This meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of EA alone in the treatment of FD relative to sham-EA or pharmacologic medication (PM). The results showed that EA could significantly improve clinical symptoms. Compared with sham-EA, EA was more effective in reducing symptom scores (SMD -3.44, 95% CI -4.21 to -2.67) and increasing normal slow waves of electrogastrogram (SMD 0.93, 95% CI -0.30 to1.55). When EA was combined with PM, there was no significant difference in reducing symptom scores (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.51 to 0.16), increasing the effective rate of clinical symptoms (risk ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.13), enhancing the level of plasma motilin (SMD 0.93, 95% CI -0.30 to1.55), and reducing gastric half-emptying time (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.20). The results also showed that there were very few adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that EA is better than the placebo (sham-EA) in treating FD, and the therapeutic effect of EA on FD is equivalent to that of PM on FD. Compared with PM, EA for FD is safer and has fewer adverse reactions. Despite limitations due to the quality and number of the included studies, EA might be used as an effective and safe treatment for FD.