RESUMO
Background: The use of magnetic resonance linear accelerators (MR-LINACs) for clinical treatment has opened up new possibilities and challenges in the field of radiation oncology. However, annual quality assurance (QA) is relatively understudied due to practical considerations. Thus, to overcome the difficulty of measuring the dose with a small water phantom for TRS-398 or TG-51 in all external beam radiation treatment unit environments, such as MR compatibility, we designed a remote phantom with a three-axis changeable capacity for QA. Methods: The designed water phantom was tested under an MR environment. The water phantom system comprised of three parts: a phantom box, a dose measurement tool, and a PMD401 drive system. The UNIDOSE universal dosimeter was used to collect beam data. The manufacturer's developer tools were utilized to position the measurement. To ensure magnetic field homogeneity, a distortion phantom was prepared using sixty fish oil capsules aligned radially to distinguish the oil and free air. The phantom was scanned in both the MR simulator and computed tomography (CT), and the acquired images were analyzed to determine the position shift. Results: The dimensions of the device are 30 cm in the X-axis, 20 cm in the Y-axis, and 17 cm in the Z-axis. Total cost of materials was no more than $10,000 US dollars. Our results indicate that the device can function normally in a regular 1.5 T MR environment without interference from the magnetic field. The water phantom's traveling speed was found to be approximately 5 mm/s with a position difference confined within 6 cm intervals during normal use. The distortion test results showed that the prepared MR environment has uniform magnetic field homogeneity. Conclusions: In this study, we constructed a prototype water phantom device that can function in an MR simulator without interference between the magnetic field and electronic components. Compared to other commercially available MR-LINAC water phantoms, our device offers a more cost-effective solution for routine monthly QA. It can shorten the duration of QA tests and relieve the burden on medical physicists.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Respiratory motion management with breath hold for patients with hepatobiliary cancers remain a challenge in the precise positioning for radiotherapy. We compared different image-guided alignment markers for estimating positional errors, and investigated the factors associated with positional errors under breath-hold control. METHODS: Spirometric motion management system (SDX) for breath holds was used in 44 patients with hepatobiliary tumor. Among them, 28 patients had a stent or embolized materials (lipiodol) as alignment markers. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and kV-orthogonal images were compared for accuracy between different alignment references. Breath-hold level (BHL) was practiced, and BHL variation (ΔBHL) was defined as the standard deviation in differences between actual BHLs and baseline BHL. Mean BHL, ΔBHL, and body-related factors were analyzed for the association with positional errors. RESULTS: Using the reference CBCT, the correlations of positional errors were significantly higher in those with stent/lipiodol than when the vertebral bone was used for alignment in three dimensions. Patients with mean BHL > 1.4 L were significantly taller (167.6 cm vs. 161.6 cm, p = 0.03) and heavier (67.1 kg vs. 57.4 kg, p = 0.02), and had different positional error in the craniocaudal direction (- 0.26 cm [caudally] vs. + 0.09 cm [cranially], p = 0.01) than those with mean BHL < 1.4 L. Positional errors were similar for patients with ΔBHL< 0.03 L and > 0.03 L. CONCLUSION: Under rigorous breath-hold respiratory control, BHL correlated with body weight and height. With more accurate alignment reference by stent/lipiodol, actual BHL but not breath-hold variation was associated with craniocaudal positional errors.