RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the recommended adjuvant treatment for patients with resectable, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data on the efficacy and safety of adjuvant alectinib as compared with chemotherapy in patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a global, phase 3, open-label, randomized trial in which patients with completely resected, ALK-positive NSCLC of stage IB (tumors ≥4 cm), II, or IIIA (as classified according to the seventh edition of the Cancer Staging Manual of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and Union for International Cancer Control) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral alectinib (600 mg twice daily) for 24 months or intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy in four 21-day cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival, tested hierarchically among patients with stage II or IIIA disease and then in the intention-to-treat population. Other end points included central nervous system (CNS) disease-free survival, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: In total, 257 patients were randomly assigned to receive alectinib (130 patients) or chemotherapy (127 patients). The percentage of patients alive and disease-free at 2 years was 93.8% in the alectinib group and 63.0% in the chemotherapy group among patients with stage II or IIIA disease (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.45; P<0.001) and 93.6% and 63.7%, respectively, in the intention-to-treat population (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.43; P<0.001). Alectinib was associated with a clinically meaningful benefit with respect to CNS disease-free survival as compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for CNS disease recurrence or death, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.58). Data for overall survival were immature. No unexpected safety findings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC of stage IB, II, or IIIA, adjuvant alectinib significantly improved disease-free survival as compared with platinum-based chemotherapy. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ALINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03456076.).
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Compostos de Platina , Humanos , Carbazóis/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Receptores Proteína Tirosina Quinases , Resultado do Tratamento , Administração Oral , Administração Intravenosa , Compostos de Platina/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) receptor tyrosine kinase binds the hepatocyte growth factor to activate downstream cell signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation, survival, and migration. Several genetic mechanisms can result in an aberrant activation of this receptor in cancer cells. One such activating mechanism involves the acquisition of gene mutations that cause MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) during mRNA splicing. Mutations leading to METex14 are found in approximately 3-4% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accumulating evidence suggests that METex14 is a true, independent oncogenic driver in NSCLC, as well as being an independent prognostic factor for poorer survival in patients with NSCLC. The successes of target therapies have relied on improved understanding of the genetic alterations that lead to the dysregulation of the molecular pathways and more advanced molecular diagnostics. Multiple efforts have been made to target the MET pathway in cancer; however, real clinical progress has only occurred since the emergence of METex14 as a valid biomarker for MET inhibition. Capmatinib is a highly potent and selective type Ib inhibitor of MET. Following preclinical demonstration of activity against MET-dependent cancer cell line growth and MET-driven tumor growth in xenograft models, data from a phase 1 clinical trial showed an acceptable safety profile of capmatinib and preliminary evidence of efficacy in patients with MET-dysregulated NSCLC. The multicohort GEOMETRY mono-1 phase 2 trial reported objective response rates of 68% and 41% in treatment-naïve and in pre-treated patients with METex14 advanced NSCLC, respectively. These results have supported the approval of capmatinib by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring METex14.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Éxons , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Mutação , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-met/antagonistas & inibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-met/genética , Triazinas/uso terapêutico , Animais , Benzamidas , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patient-derived organoid (PDO) models are highly valuable and have potentially widespread clinical applications. However, limited information is available regarding organoid models of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to characterize the consistency between primary tumors in NSCLC and PDOs and to explore the applications of PDOs as preclinical models to understand and predict treatment response during lung cancer. METHODS: Fresh tumor samples were harvested for organoid culture. Primary tumor samples and PDOs were analyzed via whole-exome sequencing. Paired samples were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis. There were 26 antineoplastic drugs tested in the PDOs. Cell viability was assessed using the Cell Titer Glo assay 7-10 days after drug treatment. A heatmap of log-transformed values of the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations was generated on the basis of drug responses of PDOs through nonlinear regression (curve fit). A total of 12 patients (stages I-III) were enrolled, and 7 paired surgical tumors and PDOs were analyzed. RESULTS: PDOs retained the histological and genetic characteristics of the primary tumors. The concordance between tumors and PDOs in mutations in the top 20 NSCLC-related genes was >80% in five patients. Sample purity was significantly and positively associated with variant allele frequency (Pearson r = 0.82, P = 0.0005) and chromosome stability. The in vitro response to drug screening with PDOs revealed high correlation with the mutation profiles in the primary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: PDOs are highly credible models for detecting NSCLC and for prospective prediction of the treatment response for personalized precision medicine. KEY POINTS: Lung cancer organoid models could save precious time of drug testing on patients, and accurately select anticancer drugs according to the drug sensitivity results, so as to provide a powerful supplement and verification for the gene sequencing.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Genômica/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Organoides/patologia , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
The Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation (LACE) meta-analysis and the meta-analysis of individual participant data reported by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Meta-analysis Collaborative Group in neo-adjuvant setting validated respectively that adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy would significantly improve overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival for resectable NSCLC. However, chemotherapy has reached a therapeutic plateau. It has been confirmed that epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) targeting therapy provides a dramatic response to patients with advanced EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC. Researchers have paid more attention to exploring applications of TKIs to early resectable NSCLCs. Several studies on adjuvant TKI treatment concluded its safety and feasibility. But there existed certain limitations of these studies as inference factors to interpret data accurately: the BR19 study recruited patients among which almost 52% had stage IB and only 15 (3.0%, 15/503) had been confirmed with EGFR-mutant type; retrospective studies performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) selected EGFR mutant-type NSCLC patients but couldn't avoid inherent defects inside retrospective researches; the RADIANT study revised endpoints from targeting at EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC)+ and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)+ mutation to only EGFR IHC+ mutation, leading to selective bias; despite that the SELECT study validated efficacy of adjuvant TKI and second round of TKI after resistance occurred, a single-arm clinical trial is not that persuasive in the absence of comparison with chemotherapy. Taking all these limitations into account, CTONG1104 in China and IMPACT in Japan have been conducted and recruiting patients to offer higher level of evidences to explore efficacy of preoperative TKI therapy for early resectable EGFR mutation positive NSCLC patients (confirmed by pathological results of tumor tissue or lymph node biopsy). On the other hand, case reports and several phase II clinical trials with small sample size tried to elbow their way on respect of preoperative TKI treatment and advised that TKI tended to improve response rate. However, no data on survival rate was present. The first phase II study of biomarker-guided neoadjuvant therapy for stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients stratified by EGFR mutation status, sponsored by CSLC0702, showed erlotinib tended to improve response rate, but failed to show benefits of disease-free survival (DFS) or OS. Subsequently, CTONG1103 was designed to investigate efficacy of erlotinib vs. combination of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) as neoadjuvant treatment in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutation in exon 19 or 21. All these ongoing trials should be worthy of our expect to provide convincing evidences for customized therapy for patients with resectable NSCLC.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Sorafenib monotherapy has shown benefits in phase II trials as third-/fourth-line treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The phase III, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled Monotherapy admInistration of Sorafenib in patientS wIth nOn-small-cell luNg cancer (MISSION) trial randomized patients with advanced relapsed/refractory NSCLC, following two or three prior treatment regimens, to sorafenib 400 mg twice a day (n = 350) or matching placebo (n = 353) plus best supportive care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression. Epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutation status was analyzed in archival tumor and/or circulating tumor DNA from blood samples obtained during screening. RESULTS: Median OS was similar in the sorafenib and placebo groups (8.2 versus 8.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.17; p = 0.47). Median PFS (2.8 versus 1.4 mo; HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.72; p < 0.0001), and time to progression (2.9 versus 1.4 mo; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.45-0.65; p < 0.0001) were significantly greater with sorafenib than with placebo. Among the 89 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, OS (13.9 versus 6.5 mo; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76; p = 0.002) and PFS (2.7 versus 1.4 mo; HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.46; p < 0.001) were significantly higher with sorafenib than placebo. PFS was significantly longer with sorafenib than placebo in patients with either wild-type or mutated KRAS, but OS was similar. Common drug-related adverse events were rash/desquamation, diarrhea, and fatigue, consistent with the safety profile of sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: Third-/fourth-line sorafenib therapy did not significantly increase OS in patients with relapsed/refractory NSCLC, despite significantly increasing PFS.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/enzimologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores ErbB/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/enzimologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Mutação , Niacinamida/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/antagonistas & inibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Sorafenibe , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Cancer is one of the major non-communicable diseases posing a threat to world health. Unfortunately, improvements in socioeconomic conditions are usually associated with increased cancer incidence. In this Commission, we focus on China, India, and Russia, which share rapidly rising cancer incidence and have cancer mortality rates that are nearly twice as high as in the UK or the USA, vast geographies, growing economies, ageing populations, increasingly westernised lifestyles, relatively disenfranchised subpopulations, serious contamination of the environment, and uncontrolled cancer-causing communicable infections. We describe the overall state of health and cancer control in each country and additional specific issues for consideration: for China, access to care, contamination of the environment, and cancer fatalism and traditional medicine; for India, affordability of care, provision of adequate health personnel, and sociocultural barriers to cancer control; and for Russia, monitoring of the burden of cancer, societal attitudes towards cancer prevention, effects of inequitable treatment and access to medicine, and a need for improved international engagement.
Assuntos
Neoplasias/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Alcoolismo/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , China , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Características Culturais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/tendências , Desenvolvimento Econômico/tendências , Poluição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Etnicidade , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Mão de Obra em Saúde/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Índia , Masculino , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Saúde Rural/tendências , Federação Russa/epidemiologia , Sexismo , Fumar , Estigma Social , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/tendênciasRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Aim of the study was to investigate efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with stage IIIB or stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, and benefited from one prior EGFR-TKI therapy and then failed, were eligible. No more than one previous chemotherapy regimen was permitted. Patients received oral sorafenib 400mg twice daily continuously until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). For patients who agreed to provide peripheral blood or tumor tissue, we analyzed the genotype of Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death (BIM) deletion polymorphism and EGFR mutation status. RESULTS: Of 65 enrolled patients, 64 were evaluable. The DCR was 32.8%, which did not meet the predefined statistical hypothesis of 38.4%. The median PFS and OS were 3.7 months [95% (confidence interval), 3.5-3.9 months] and 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.7-9.2 months), respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed no correlation between DCR and age, gender, smoking status and performance status. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) was the predominant toxicity occurring in 71.9% of patients. Fourteen patients (21.9%) had ≥ grade 2 dermatologic reactions that resulted sorafenib dose reduction in three patients (4.7%). Of 36 patients, the BIM deletion polymorphism was found in 3, and no response to sorafenib was observed. In 30 tumor tissues, 22 EGFR active mutations were found. The DCR had no significant difference between mutation-positive and wild-type patients (31.8% vs. 42.9%, respectively; HR, 0.622; p=0.665). CONCLUSION: Sorafenib monotherapy did not achieve positive result in patients defined in our trial and we need better biomarker to determine the population who can benefit from sorafenib treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00922584).
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Reguladoras de Apoptose/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/genética , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Proteína 11 Semelhante a Bcl-2 , Carcinogênese , China , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Feminino , Genótipo , Síndrome Mão-Pé/etiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Niacinamida/administração & dosagem , Niacinamida/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Polimorfismo Genético , Estudos Prospectivos , Deleção de Sequência/genética , Sorafenibe , Análise de Sobrevida , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
Asia needs a guideline for non-small-cell lung cancer because of differences in medical care, medical care insurance, ethnic variation and drug approval lag within Asian countries and compared with Western countries. Due to ethnic differences, drug dosages are often higher in the USA than in Japan. EGFR mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer was detected in 32% of Asians but only 6% of non-Asians, while differences in irinotecan metabolism cause higher frequencies of toxicity (leukopenia, diarrhea) in Asians. Pharmacodynamic ethnic differences in relation to paclitaxel/carboplatin resulted in longer median survival and a higher 1-year survival rate for Japanese-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients compared with Americans. To solve the problem of drug lag, pharmaceutical companies must perform multinational Asian clinical trials with quick accrual of patients, while regulatory authorities must establish high-quality, efficient approval processes, and achieve regulatory harmonization. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network promotes creation of national clinical practice guidelines, and Korea, China and Thailand adapted the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Many Asian countries still lack such guidelines, and there are no pan-Asian guidelines for non-small-cell lung cancer. Japan developed its own non-small-cell lung cancer guidelines and also a gefitinib guidance. The study group members concluded that immediate establishment of an Asian non-small-cell lung cancer guideline will be difficult because of the differences among the countries. Asian collaborative trials on treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer need to be started at an early date to generate Asian data.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Ásia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Genes erbB-1 , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2 expression in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: From 59 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 33 without neoadjuvant therapy (control), core biopsy samples before the chemotherapy or surgery and surgical specimens were obtained for assay of ER, PR, and HER-2 expression. RESULTS: Quantitative alteration of ER expression occurred in 37.29% (22/59) of the patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in 15.15% (5/33) of the control patients, showing statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05), but the changes in ER expression status (conversion between positivity/negativity ratio) exhibited no significant difference. After the surgery, quantitative changes in PR expression was noted in 23.73% (14/59) of patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, without significant difference from those in the control group or changes in the expression status. Similarly, the changes in HER-2 expression seen in 13.56% (8/59) of the patients with chemotherapy was also comparable with the control group, without significant changes in the expression status. CONCLUSIONS: Significant changes occur in ER receptor expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer, but such changes do not affect the ER status. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has no significant effects on PR and HER-2 expression in breast cancer patients.