Correlation of susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans to amphotericin B with clinical outcome.

Testing of Cryptococcus neoformans for susceptibility to antifungal drugs by standard microtiter methods has not been shown to correlate with clinical outcomes. This report describes a modified quantitative broth macrodilution susceptibility method showing a correlation with both the patient's quantitative biological response in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the survival of 85 patients treated with amphotericin B (AMB). The Spearman rank correlation between the quantitative in vitro measure of susceptibility and the quantitative measure of the number of organisms in the patient's CSF was 0.37 (P < 0.01; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.20, 0.60) for the first susceptibility test replicate and 0.46 (P < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.21, 0.62) for the second susceptibility test replicate. The median in vitro estimated response (defined as the fungal burden after AMB treatment) at 1.5 mg/liter AMB for patients alive at day 14 was 5 CFU (95% CI, 3, 8), compared to 57 CFU (95% CI, 4, 832) for those who died before day 14. These exploratory results suggest that patients whose isolates show a quantitative in vitro susceptibility response below 10 CFU/ml were more likely to survive beyond day 14.

Ceftazidime vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of severe melioidosis.

An open, paired, randomized, controlled trial of high-dose parenteral ceftazidime (120 mg/[kg.d]) vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate (160 mg/[kg.d]) for the treatment of severe melioidosis was conducted in Ubon Ratchatani in northeastern Thailand. Of 379 patients enrolled in the study, 212 (56%) had culture-proven melioidosis; 106 patients were in each treatment group. The overall mortality rate (47%) was similar for both treatment groups. However, 4 of 75 surviving patients in the ceftazidime group compared with 16 of 69 surviving patients in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group were switched to the alternate regimen because of an unsatisfactory clinical response after > or = 72 hours of treatment (P = .004). The overall therapeutic failure rate (i.e., treatment failure or death due to uncontrolled melioidosis) was significantly higher for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group than for the ceftazidime group (P = .02). Clinical and bacteriologic responses for successfully treated patients were similar in both groups, and both treatments were well tolerated. Parenteral amoxicillin/clavulanate is a safe and effective initial treatment, but parenteral ceftazidime remains the treatment of choice for severe melioidosis.

Amoxycillin-clavulanic acid treatment of melioidosis.

Melioidosis is a serious infection with high acute mortality, and a high rate of relapse despite protracted antimicrobial treatment. The current recommended conventional oral treatment regimen is a 4-drug combination of high-dose chloramphenicol, doxycycline and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole given for between 6 weeks and 6 months. We have evaluated prospectively the use of amoxycillin-clavulanic acid, to which Pseudomonas pseudomallei is consistently sensitive in vitro, for the oral maintenance treatment of melioidosis. Amoxycillin-clavulanic acid was used either as sole treatment of localized disease, or as maintenance therapy following either parenteral ceftazidime or the conventional 4-drug regime; 20 patients with localized infections and 26 with septicaemic melioidosis received a median of 7.5 (2-12) weeks treatment. After a mean follow-up period of 6 months (range 1-19), 31 patients (67%) remain free of disease. The drug was well tolerated. Three patients had fatal relapses, one other died suddenly at home, and another died from underlying promyelocytic leukaemia. The remaining 10 relapses were treated successfully. Resistance developed in one case. Amoxycillin-clavulanic acid is a safe alternative to the conventional 4-drug antimicrobial combination for the oral treatment of melioidosis. It may be of particular value in children, pregnant women, and in infections with Ps. pseudomallei resistant to the potentially toxic conventional regimen, but the optimum dose and duration of therapy need to be established.

The antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas pseudomallei. Emergence of resistance in vitro and during treatment.

We have measured the in-vitro activity of 27 antimicrobials against 211 clinical and ten reference strains of Pseudomonas pseudomallei. Imipenem was the most active antibiotic tested, followed by piperacillin, doxycycline, amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, cefixime, cefetamet, azlocillin and ceftazidime, all of which had MICs of less than or equal to 2 mg/l for the majority of strains. The measured MICs were dependent on the media and inocula used, to an extent which varied with the antibiotic class under test; MICs of ureidopenicillins were particularly inoculum-dependent. The beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin were bactericidal, whereas the agents conventionally used to treat melioidosis (doxycycline, chloramphenicol, sulphamethoxazole and trimethoprim) had bacteriostatic activity only. Strains highly resistant to chloramphenicol (MIC greater than or equal to 256 mg/l) emerged during treatment in 7.1% of patients. These strains were fully virulent, and frequently showed cross-resistance to tetracyclines, sulphamethoxazole, trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin, with paradoxical increased susceptibility to beta-lactams and aminoglycosides. Similar resistance patterns were seen in mutants generated in vitro and two reference strains. One strain with isolated ceftazidime resistance, reversible by clavulanic acid, emerged during treatment. Several of the new beta-lactam antibiotics are of potential value in the therapy of P. pseudomallei infections. Patients should be carefully monitored for the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains during treatment of melioidosis.