Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Can J Cardiol ; 34(11): 1371-1392, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30404743

RESUMO

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Committee provides periodic reviews of new data to produce focused updates that address clinically important advances in atrial fibrillation (AF) management. This 2018 Focused Update addresses: (1) anticoagulation in the context of cardioversion of AF; (2) the management of antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF in the context of coronary artery disease; (3) investigation and management of subclinical AF; (4) the use of antidotes for the reversal of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; (5) acute pharmacological cardioversion of AF; (6) catheter ablation for AF, including patients with concomitant AF and heart failure; and (7) an integrated approach to the patient with AF and modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. The recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) standards. Individual studies and literature were reviewed for quality and bias; the literature review process and evidence tables are included as Supplementary Material and are available on the CCS Web site. Details of the updated recommendations are presented, along with their background and rationale. This document is linked to an updated summary of all CCS AF guidelines recommendations, from 2010 to the present 2018 Focused Update, which is provided in the Supplementary Material.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Algoritmos , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Antídotos/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Ablação por Cateter , Coagulantes/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Cardioversão Elétrica , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Sociedades Médicas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle
3.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 14(5): 492-8, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12776866

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Not all patients experience recurrent sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias after placement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). We evaluated the clinical and electrophysiologic predictors of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) recurrence following ICD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n = 133) underwent 4 +/- 3 serial electrophysiologic studies (EPS) over 50 +/- 26 months following ICD implantation. Sustained VT/VF could always be induced during follow-up EPS in 49 patients; sustained VT/VF was sometimes induced during follow-up EPS in 47 patients; and sustained VT/VF could never be induced during follow-up EPS in 37 patients. Spontaneous VT/VF requiring ICD therapy occurred in 107 patients during follow-up. Patients with sustained VT/VF that was always inducible or sometimes inducible during follow-up experienced more frequent episodes of VT/VF following ICD implant (20.5, 95% CI 12.7-33.0; and 17.8, 95% CI 11.3-28.1 episodes/patient respectively; vs 3.0, 95% CI 2.0-4.6 episodes/patient for patients with VT/VF never induced, P < 0.001). Inducibility of sustained VT/VF post-ICD implant (P < 0.001) and sustained VT as the presenting arrhythmia (P = 0.02) were independent predictors of spontaneous VT/VF recurrence. CONCLUSION: Reproducibly inducible VT/VF following ICD implantation predicts a high probability of VT/VF recurrence and identifies a cohort of patients who experience frequent episodes of VT/VF over time. Persistent noninducibility of sustained VT/VF identifies a group of patients who experience no or very few episodes of VT/VF recurrence.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Taquicardia Ventricular/etiologia , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Fibrilação Ventricular/etiologia , Fibrilação Ventricular/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Ventricular/terapia
4.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 41(3): 420-5, 2003 Feb 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12575969

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of chelation therapy with ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) on endothelium-dependent vasomotor responses in patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress plays an important role in the dysfunction of endothelium and development of atherosclerosis. Modification of cardiac risk factors and employment of antioxidants have been shown to improve endothelial function. Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid chelation therapy is considered to be a complementary therapy for patients with CAD and is proposed to have antioxidant properties. METHODS: A total of 47 patients enrolled in the Program to Assess Alternative Treatment Strategies to Achieve Cardiac Health (PATCH) participated in this substudy and had complete data. High-resolution ultrasound was used to assess endothelium-dependent brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in patients with CAD in a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled fashion. Patients were randomized to chelation therapy or placebo. The primary end point was the absolute difference in FMD after the first and 33rd treatments (6 months) of study groups compared with their baselines. RESULTS: At the baseline, the study population had mild impairment of FMD (7.2 +/- 3.4%). The first chelation treatment did not change FMD as compared with placebo (chelation 6.5 +/- 3.5% vs. placebo 7.4 +/- 2.9%; p value = 0.371). The brachial artery studies at six months did not demonstrate significant differences in FMD between study groups (placebo 7.3 +/- 3.4% vs. chelation 7.3 +/- 3.2%; p value = 0.961). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that EDTA chelation therapy in combination with vitamins and minerals does not provide additional benefits on abnormal vasomotor responses in patients with CAD optimally treated with proven therapies for atherosclerotic risk factors.


Assuntos
Quelantes/farmacologia , Quelantes/uso terapêutico , Terapia por Quelação , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Ácido Edético/farmacologia , Ácido Edético/uso terapêutico , Endotélio Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Endotélio Vascular/fisiopatologia , Sistema Vasomotor/efeitos dos fármacos , Sistema Vasomotor/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Artéria Braquial/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Braquial/efeitos dos fármacos , Artéria Braquial/fisiopatologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Endotélio Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Ultrassonografia , Sistema Vasomotor/diagnóstico por imagem
5.
Circulation ; 106(19): 2466-72, 2002 Nov 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12417544

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fifty percent of deaths in patients with coronary disease occur suddenly. Although many factors correlate with increased mortality, there is little information regarding the influence of these factors on mode of death. As such, optimum methods to determine patients most likely to benefit from implantable defibrillator therapy are unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the relation of ejection fraction and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias to mode of death in all 1791 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial who did not receive antiarrhythmic therapy. Total mortality and arrhythmic deaths/cardiac arrests occurred more frequently in patients with ejection fraction <30% than in those with ejection fraction of 30% to 40%. The percentage of deaths classified as arrhythmic was similar in patients with ejection fraction <30% or > or =30%. The relative contribution of arrhythmic events to total mortality was significantly higher in patients with inducible tachyarrhythmia (58% of deaths in inducible patients versus 46% in noninducible patients, P=0.004). The higher percentage of events that were arrhythmic among patients with inducible tachyarrhythmia appeared more distinct among patients with an ejection fraction > or =30% (61% of events were arrhythmic among inducible patients with ejection fraction > or =30% and only 42% among noninducible patients, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Both low ejection fraction and inducible tachyarrhythmias identify patients with coronary disease at increased mortality risk. Ejection fraction does not discriminate between modes of death, whereas inducible tachyarrhythmia identifies patients for whom death, if it occurs, is significantly more likely to be arrhythmic, especially if ejection fraction is > or =30%.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Volume Sistólico , Taquicardia Ventricular/mortalidade , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatologia , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
JAMA ; 287(4): 481-6, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11798370

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Chelation therapy using EDTA is an unproven but widely used alternative therapy for ischemic heart disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine if current EDTA protocols have a favorable impact on exercise ischemia threshold and quality of life measures in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted between January 1996 and January 2000. SETTING: Participants were recruited from a cohort of cardiac catheterization patients and the practices of cardiologists in Calgary, Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: We screened 3140 patients, performed a qualifying treadmill test in 171, and enrolled 84. Entry criteria included age at least 21 years with coronary artery disease proven by angiography or a documented myocardial infarction and stable angina while receiving optimal medical therapy. The required treadmill test used a gradual ramping protocol and patients had to demonstrate at least 1-mm ST depression. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive infusion with either weight-adjusted (40 mg/kg) EDTA chelation therapy (n = 41) or placebo (n = 43) for 3 hours per treatment, twice weekly for 15 weeks and once per month for an additional 3 months. Patients in both groups took oral multivitamin therapy as well. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change from baseline to 27-week follow-up in time to ischemia (1-mm ST depression). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients in each group completed the 27-week protocol. One chelation patient had therapy discontinued for a transient rise in serum creatinine. The mean (SD) baseline exercise time to ischemia was 572 (172) and 589 (176) seconds in the placebo and chelation groups, respectively. The corresponding mean changes in time to ischemia at 27 weeks were 54 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI], 23-84 seconds; P<.001) and 63 seconds (95% CI, 29-95 seconds; P<.001), for a difference of 9 seconds (95% CI, -36 to 53 seconds; P =.69). Exercise capacity and quality of life scores improved by similar degrees in both groups. CONCLUSION: Based on exercise time to ischemia, exercise capacity, and quality of life measurements, there is no evidence to support a beneficial effect of chelation therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease, stable angina, and a positive treadmill test for ischemia.


Assuntos
Quelantes/uso terapêutico , Terapia por Quelação , Ácido Edético/uso terapêutico , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA