Research progress of traditional Chinese medicine extracts in intervention of fibrosis caused by silicosis / 环境与职业医学

Silicotic nodules and pulmonary fibrosis are histopathological appearance in silicosis patients after long-term inhalation of crystalline silica particles, and are difficult to reverse and recover. Research on the pathogenesis and treatment strategies of silicosis has significantly lagged behind medical progress and clinical needs, resulting in the disease remaining a thorny clinical problem. Traditional Chinese medicine extracts or compound preparations have become a hot issue in exploring silicosis treatment strategies in recent years. This paper described the main pathological processes of pulmonary fibrosis caused by silicosis, followed by introducing its main pathogenesis mechanisms, including transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)/Smad signaling pathway, oxidative stress reaction, apoptosis, and autophagy. In addition, it briefly described the research progress, targets, and intervention effects of selected traditional Chinese medicine extracts, which provides a scientific basis for the theoretical and clinical research of traditional Chinese medicine extracts in inhibiting pulmonary fibrosis. To change the clinical status quo of silicosis fibrosis which is difficult to control and reverse, the paper proposed that we can further explore the pathogenesis and progression mechanisms of silicosis and drug treatment strategy, and focus on the transformation of basic research into clinical practice.

The effect of kanglaite injection in combination with gefitinib versus gefitinib alone in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of kanglaite (KLT) injection combined with gefitinib versus gefitinib alone in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The randomized controlled trials involving NSCLC treatment with KLT injection combined with gefitinib versus gefitinib alone were searched on seven medical databases up to October 2016. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. The RevMan 5.3 software was employed for data analysis. RESULTS: Seven randomized trials involving 554 patients met our criteria. Compared with gefitinib alone, KLT injection combined with gefitinib showed significant effects in increasing objective response rate (relative risk [RR] =1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.75), improving the performance status (RR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.34-2.42), raising the percentages of CD4+ cells (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 4.45; 95% CI: 2.61-6.28), natural killer cells (WMD = 4.43; 95% CI: 3.85-5.01), and ratio of CD4+/CD8+ (WMD = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.02-0.14), whereas the difference was not significant in gefitinib toxicity including rash (RR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.58-1.40, P = 0.65), diarrhea (RR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.66-1.64, P = 0.88), and liver injury (RR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.58-1.73, P = 1.00), CD3+ cells (WMD = 1.16; 95% CI: -2.64-4.97) and CD8+ cells (WMD = 6.78; 95% CI: -1.68-15.23). CONCLUSION: Co-use of KLT injection and gefitinib may benefit the patients with NSCLC through enhancing the therapeutic effectiveness compared with gefitinib alone. To confirm these results, further rigorously designed trials are warranted.

Effect of sequential treatment with TCM syndrome differentiation on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and AECOPD risk window.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the comprehensive interventions based on three Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) patterns therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and AECOPD risk window. METHODS: A prospective, multi-center, single-blinded, double-dummy and randomized controlled clinical trial is being conducted to test the therapeutic effects of a sequential two stage treatment. A total of 364 patients were enrolled into this study with 182 in each treatment group (TCM and conventional). Patients received medication (or control) according to their assigned group. TCM treatment according to syndrome differentiation for AECOPD were administered twice daily to patients with AECOPD over 7-21days, followed by TCM for AECOPD risk window (RW) over 28days. All patients were followed up for 6 months. Exacerbations were used as the primary outcome measures. Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and the modified medical research council dyspnea (MMRC) scale, quality of life and mortality rate were used as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Of 364 randomized patients, 353 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and 290 in the per-protocol analysis. In the TCM group, 16 patients (10.4%) reached the primary end point; 24 (17.7%) in the conventional group (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.33-1.06; p=0.074). Among patients with a re-exacerbation, the median time to event was 107.5days (interquartile range [IQR], 39.5-129.0) in the TCM and 50days (IQR, 31-130.5) in the conventional group (P=0.011). After exacerbation therapy and a further 180-days follow-up, patients in the TCM group had significant improvements in dyspnea, as measured by MMRC (P=0.003), Patients in the TCM group also had improvements in health-related quality of life (P=0.002), as measured COPD Assessment Test (CAT). There was no difference between groups in death, and recovery of lung function. There were no differences between the TCM and conventional treatment group in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting to the respiratory department with acute exacerbations of COPD, TCM treatments with syndrome differentiation will have beneficial effects with regard to re-exacerbation, relieving symptoms, improving quality of life for COPD patients.